EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait

In this paper, we describe and validate the EquiMoves system, which aims to support equine veterinarians in assessing lameness and gait performance in horses. The system works by capturing horse motion from up to eight synchronized wireless inertial measurement units. It can be used in various equin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephan Bosch, Filipe Serra Bragança, Mihai Marin-Perianu, Raluca Marin-Perianu, Berend Jan van der Zwaag, John Voskamp, Willem Back, René van Weeren, Paul Havinga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-03-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
IMU
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/3/850
id doaj-301268f2e6814f79a950bf33532ec6f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-301268f2e6814f79a950bf33532ec6f22020-11-25T00:49:06ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202018-03-0118385010.3390/s18030850s18030850EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse GaitStephan Bosch0Filipe Serra Bragança1Mihai Marin-Perianu2Raluca Marin-Perianu3Berend Jan van der Zwaag4John Voskamp5Willem Back6René van Weeren7Paul Havinga8Inertia Technology B.V., 7521 AG Enschede, The NetherlandsDepartment of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The NetherlandsInertia Technology B.V., 7521 AG Enschede, The NetherlandsInertia Technology B.V., 7521 AG Enschede, The NetherlandsInertia Technology B.V., 7521 AG Enschede, The NetherlandsRosmark Consultancy, 6733 AA Wekerom, The NetherlandsDepartment of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Computer Science, Pervasive Systems Group, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The NetherlandsIn this paper, we describe and validate the EquiMoves system, which aims to support equine veterinarians in assessing lameness and gait performance in horses. The system works by capturing horse motion from up to eight synchronized wireless inertial measurement units. It can be used in various equine gait modes, and analyzes both upper-body and limb movements. The validation against an optical motion capture system is based on a Bland–Altman analysis that illustrates the agreement between the two systems. The sagittal kinematic results (protraction, retraction, and sagittal range of motion) show limits of agreement of ± 2.3 degrees and an absolute bias of 0.3 degrees in the worst case. The coronal kinematic results (adduction, abduction, and coronal range of motion) show limits of agreement of − 8.8 and 8.1 degrees, and an absolute bias of 0.4 degrees in the worst case. The worse coronal kinematic results are most likely caused by the optical system setup (depth perception difficulty and suboptimal marker placement). The upper-body symmetry results show no significant bias in the agreement between the two systems; in most cases, the agreement is within ±5 mm. On a trial-level basis, the limits of agreement for withers and sacrum are within ±2 mm, meaning that the system can properly quantify motion asymmetry. Overall, the bias for all symmetry-related results is less than 1 mm, which is important for reproducibility and further comparison to other systems.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/3/850horsegait analysislamenessIMUoptical motion captureagreement analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephan Bosch
Filipe Serra Bragança
Mihai Marin-Perianu
Raluca Marin-Perianu
Berend Jan van der Zwaag
John Voskamp
Willem Back
René van Weeren
Paul Havinga
spellingShingle Stephan Bosch
Filipe Serra Bragança
Mihai Marin-Perianu
Raluca Marin-Perianu
Berend Jan van der Zwaag
John Voskamp
Willem Back
René van Weeren
Paul Havinga
EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait
Sensors
horse
gait analysis
lameness
IMU
optical motion capture
agreement analysis
author_facet Stephan Bosch
Filipe Serra Bragança
Mihai Marin-Perianu
Raluca Marin-Perianu
Berend Jan van der Zwaag
John Voskamp
Willem Back
René van Weeren
Paul Havinga
author_sort Stephan Bosch
title EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait
title_short EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait
title_full EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait
title_fullStr EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait
title_full_unstemmed EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait
title_sort equimoves: a wireless networked inertial measurement system for objective examination of horse gait
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2018-03-01
description In this paper, we describe and validate the EquiMoves system, which aims to support equine veterinarians in assessing lameness and gait performance in horses. The system works by capturing horse motion from up to eight synchronized wireless inertial measurement units. It can be used in various equine gait modes, and analyzes both upper-body and limb movements. The validation against an optical motion capture system is based on a Bland–Altman analysis that illustrates the agreement between the two systems. The sagittal kinematic results (protraction, retraction, and sagittal range of motion) show limits of agreement of ± 2.3 degrees and an absolute bias of 0.3 degrees in the worst case. The coronal kinematic results (adduction, abduction, and coronal range of motion) show limits of agreement of − 8.8 and 8.1 degrees, and an absolute bias of 0.4 degrees in the worst case. The worse coronal kinematic results are most likely caused by the optical system setup (depth perception difficulty and suboptimal marker placement). The upper-body symmetry results show no significant bias in the agreement between the two systems; in most cases, the agreement is within ±5 mm. On a trial-level basis, the limits of agreement for withers and sacrum are within ±2 mm, meaning that the system can properly quantify motion asymmetry. Overall, the bias for all symmetry-related results is less than 1 mm, which is important for reproducibility and further comparison to other systems.
topic horse
gait analysis
lameness
IMU
optical motion capture
agreement analysis
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/3/850
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanbosch equimovesawirelessnetworkedinertialmeasurementsystemforobjectiveexaminationofhorsegait
AT filipeserrabraganca equimovesawirelessnetworkedinertialmeasurementsystemforobjectiveexaminationofhorsegait
AT mihaimarinperianu equimovesawirelessnetworkedinertialmeasurementsystemforobjectiveexaminationofhorsegait
AT ralucamarinperianu equimovesawirelessnetworkedinertialmeasurementsystemforobjectiveexaminationofhorsegait
AT berendjanvanderzwaag equimovesawirelessnetworkedinertialmeasurementsystemforobjectiveexaminationofhorsegait
AT johnvoskamp equimovesawirelessnetworkedinertialmeasurementsystemforobjectiveexaminationofhorsegait
AT willemback equimovesawirelessnetworkedinertialmeasurementsystemforobjectiveexaminationofhorsegait
AT renevanweeren equimovesawirelessnetworkedinertialmeasurementsystemforobjectiveexaminationofhorsegait
AT paulhavinga equimovesawirelessnetworkedinertialmeasurementsystemforobjectiveexaminationofhorsegait
_version_ 1725252979494223872