Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial
Question: In people with nerve-related leg pain, does adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active improve leg pain, disability, low back pain, function, global perceived effect and location of symptoms? Design: Randomised trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis....
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Physiotherapy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955316300571 |
id |
doaj-302c507dc4a84812b47167632fe56ada |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-302c507dc4a84812b47167632fe56ada2020-11-24T23:29:39ZengElsevierJournal of Physiotherapy1836-95532016-10-0162419720210.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.007Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trialGiovanni FerreiraFábio StievenFrancisco AraujoMatheus WiebuschCarolina RosaRodrigo PlentzMarcelo SilvaQuestion: In people with nerve-related leg pain, does adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active improve leg pain, disability, low back pain, function, global perceived effect and location of symptoms? Design: Randomised trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: Sixty participants with nerve-related leg pain recruited from the community. Interventions: The experimental group received four sessions of neurodynamic treatment. Both groups received advice to remain active. Outcome measures: Leg pain and low back pain (0, none, to 10, worst), Oswestry Disability Index (0, none, to 100, worst), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (0, unable to perform, to 30, able to perform), global perceived effect (–5 to 5) and location of symptoms were measured at 2 and 4 weeks after randomisation. Continuous outcomes were analysed by linear mixed models. Location of symptoms was assessed by relative risk (95% CI). Results: At 2 weeks, the experimental group did not have significantly greater improvement than the control group in leg pain (MD –1.1, 95% CI –2.3 to 0.1) or disability (MD –3.3, 95% CI –9.6 to 2.9). At 4 weeks, the experimental group experienced a significantly greater reduction in leg pain (MD –2.4, 95% CI –3.6 to –1.2) and low back pain (MD –1.5, 95% CI –2.8 to –0.2). The experimental group also improved significantly more in function at 2 weeks (MD 5.2, 95% CI 2.2 to 8.2) and 4 weeks (MD 4.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.8), as well as global perceived effect at 2 weeks (MD 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.5) and 4 weeks (MD 2.9, 95% CI 1.9 to 3.9). No significant between-group differences occurred in disability at 4 weeks and location of symptoms. Conclusion: Adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active did not improve leg pain and disability at 2 weeks. Trial registration: NCT01954199. [Ferreira G, Stieven F, Araujo F, Wiebusch M, Rosa C, Plentz R, et al. (2016) Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 62: 197–202]http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955316300571Low back painSciaticaManual therapyNeurodynamic treatmentSlump test |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Giovanni Ferreira Fábio Stieven Francisco Araujo Matheus Wiebusch Carolina Rosa Rodrigo Plentz Marcelo Silva |
spellingShingle |
Giovanni Ferreira Fábio Stieven Francisco Araujo Matheus Wiebusch Carolina Rosa Rodrigo Plentz Marcelo Silva Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial Journal of Physiotherapy Low back pain Sciatica Manual therapy Neurodynamic treatment Slump test |
author_facet |
Giovanni Ferreira Fábio Stieven Francisco Araujo Matheus Wiebusch Carolina Rosa Rodrigo Plentz Marcelo Silva |
author_sort |
Giovanni Ferreira |
title |
Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial |
title_short |
Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial |
title_full |
Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial |
title_fullStr |
Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial |
title_sort |
neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Journal of Physiotherapy |
issn |
1836-9553 |
publishDate |
2016-10-01 |
description |
Question: In people with nerve-related leg pain, does adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active improve leg pain, disability, low back pain, function, global perceived effect and location of symptoms? Design: Randomised trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: Sixty participants with nerve-related leg pain recruited from the community. Interventions: The experimental group received four sessions of neurodynamic treatment. Both groups received advice to remain active. Outcome measures: Leg pain and low back pain (0, none, to 10, worst), Oswestry Disability Index (0, none, to 100, worst), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (0, unable to perform, to 30, able to perform), global perceived effect (–5 to 5) and location of symptoms were measured at 2 and 4 weeks after randomisation. Continuous outcomes were analysed by linear mixed models. Location of symptoms was assessed by relative risk (95% CI). Results: At 2 weeks, the experimental group did not have significantly greater improvement than the control group in leg pain (MD –1.1, 95% CI –2.3 to 0.1) or disability (MD –3.3, 95% CI –9.6 to 2.9). At 4 weeks, the experimental group experienced a significantly greater reduction in leg pain (MD –2.4, 95% CI –3.6 to –1.2) and low back pain (MD –1.5, 95% CI –2.8 to –0.2). The experimental group also improved significantly more in function at 2 weeks (MD 5.2, 95% CI 2.2 to 8.2) and 4 weeks (MD 4.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.8), as well as global perceived effect at 2 weeks (MD 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.5) and 4 weeks (MD 2.9, 95% CI 1.9 to 3.9). No significant between-group differences occurred in disability at 4 weeks and location of symptoms. Conclusion: Adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active did not improve leg pain and disability at 2 weeks. Trial registration: NCT01954199. [Ferreira G, Stieven F, Araujo F, Wiebusch M, Rosa C, Plentz R, et al. (2016) Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 62: 197–202] |
topic |
Low back pain Sciatica Manual therapy Neurodynamic treatment Slump test |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955316300571 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giovanniferreira neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial AT fabiostieven neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial AT franciscoaraujo neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial AT matheuswiebusch neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial AT carolinarosa neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial AT rodrigoplentz neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial AT marcelosilva neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial |
_version_ |
1725544498737446912 |