Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial

Question: In people with nerve-related leg pain, does adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active improve leg pain, disability, low back pain, function, global perceived effect and location of symptoms? Design: Randomised trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giovanni Ferreira, Fábio Stieven, Francisco Araujo, Matheus Wiebusch, Carolina Rosa, Rodrigo Plentz, Marcelo Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-10-01
Series:Journal of Physiotherapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955316300571
id doaj-302c507dc4a84812b47167632fe56ada
record_format Article
spelling doaj-302c507dc4a84812b47167632fe56ada2020-11-24T23:29:39ZengElsevierJournal of Physiotherapy1836-95532016-10-0162419720210.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.007Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trialGiovanni FerreiraFábio StievenFrancisco AraujoMatheus WiebuschCarolina RosaRodrigo PlentzMarcelo SilvaQuestion: In people with nerve-related leg pain, does adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active improve leg pain, disability, low back pain, function, global perceived effect and location of symptoms? Design: Randomised trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: Sixty participants with nerve-related leg pain recruited from the community. Interventions: The experimental group received four sessions of neurodynamic treatment. Both groups received advice to remain active. Outcome measures: Leg pain and low back pain (0, none, to 10, worst), Oswestry Disability Index (0, none, to 100, worst), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (0, unable to perform, to 30, able to perform), global perceived effect (–5 to 5) and location of symptoms were measured at 2 and 4 weeks after randomisation. Continuous outcomes were analysed by linear mixed models. Location of symptoms was assessed by relative risk (95% CI). Results: At 2 weeks, the experimental group did not have significantly greater improvement than the control group in leg pain (MD –1.1, 95% CI –2.3 to 0.1) or disability (MD –3.3, 95% CI –9.6 to 2.9). At 4 weeks, the experimental group experienced a significantly greater reduction in leg pain (MD –2.4, 95% CI –3.6 to –1.2) and low back pain (MD –1.5, 95% CI –2.8 to –0.2). The experimental group also improved significantly more in function at 2 weeks (MD 5.2, 95% CI 2.2 to 8.2) and 4 weeks (MD 4.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.8), as well as global perceived effect at 2 weeks (MD 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.5) and 4 weeks (MD 2.9, 95% CI 1.9 to 3.9). No significant between-group differences occurred in disability at 4 weeks and location of symptoms. Conclusion: Adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active did not improve leg pain and disability at 2 weeks. Trial registration: NCT01954199. [Ferreira G, Stieven F, Araujo F, Wiebusch M, Rosa C, Plentz R, et al. (2016) Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 62: 197–202]http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955316300571Low back painSciaticaManual therapyNeurodynamic treatmentSlump test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giovanni Ferreira
Fábio Stieven
Francisco Araujo
Matheus Wiebusch
Carolina Rosa
Rodrigo Plentz
Marcelo Silva
spellingShingle Giovanni Ferreira
Fábio Stieven
Francisco Araujo
Matheus Wiebusch
Carolina Rosa
Rodrigo Plentz
Marcelo Silva
Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial
Journal of Physiotherapy
Low back pain
Sciatica
Manual therapy
Neurodynamic treatment
Slump test
author_facet Giovanni Ferreira
Fábio Stieven
Francisco Araujo
Matheus Wiebusch
Carolina Rosa
Rodrigo Plentz
Marcelo Silva
author_sort Giovanni Ferreira
title Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial
title_short Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial
title_full Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial
title_fullStr Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial
title_sort neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Physiotherapy
issn 1836-9553
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Question: In people with nerve-related leg pain, does adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active improve leg pain, disability, low back pain, function, global perceived effect and location of symptoms? Design: Randomised trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: Sixty participants with nerve-related leg pain recruited from the community. Interventions: The experimental group received four sessions of neurodynamic treatment. Both groups received advice to remain active. Outcome measures: Leg pain and low back pain (0, none, to 10, worst), Oswestry Disability Index (0, none, to 100, worst), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (0, unable to perform, to 30, able to perform), global perceived effect (–5 to 5) and location of symptoms were measured at 2 and 4 weeks after randomisation. Continuous outcomes were analysed by linear mixed models. Location of symptoms was assessed by relative risk (95% CI). Results: At 2 weeks, the experimental group did not have significantly greater improvement than the control group in leg pain (MD –1.1, 95% CI –2.3 to 0.1) or disability (MD –3.3, 95% CI –9.6 to 2.9). At 4 weeks, the experimental group experienced a significantly greater reduction in leg pain (MD –2.4, 95% CI –3.6 to –1.2) and low back pain (MD –1.5, 95% CI –2.8 to –0.2). The experimental group also improved significantly more in function at 2 weeks (MD 5.2, 95% CI 2.2 to 8.2) and 4 weeks (MD 4.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.8), as well as global perceived effect at 2 weeks (MD 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.5) and 4 weeks (MD 2.9, 95% CI 1.9 to 3.9). No significant between-group differences occurred in disability at 4 weeks and location of symptoms. Conclusion: Adding neurodynamic treatment to advice to remain active did not improve leg pain and disability at 2 weeks. Trial registration: NCT01954199. [Ferreira G, Stieven F, Araujo F, Wiebusch M, Rosa C, Plentz R, et al. (2016) Neurodynamic treatment did not improve pain and disability at two weeks in patients with chronic nerve-related leg pain: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 62: 197–202]
topic Low back pain
Sciatica
Manual therapy
Neurodynamic treatment
Slump test
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955316300571
work_keys_str_mv AT giovanniferreira neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial
AT fabiostieven neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial
AT franciscoaraujo neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial
AT matheuswiebusch neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial
AT carolinarosa neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial
AT rodrigoplentz neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial
AT marcelosilva neurodynamictreatmentdidnotimprovepainanddisabilityattwoweeksinpatientswithchronicnerverelatedlegpainarandomisedtrial
_version_ 1725544498737446912