L1 Conceptual Transfer in the Acquisition of L2 Motion Events in Spanish and English: The Thinking-for-Speaking Hypothesis

This research paper takes and builds upon Slobin’s (1987) thinking-for-speaking hypothesis as a basis for exploring the notion of conceptual transfer from the L1 in the acquisition and production of motion events in an L2. This is achieved by investigating the extent to which L2 transfer presents it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sharpen Rosalie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2016-09-01
Series:Open Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opli.2016.2.issue-1/opli-2016-0011/opli-2016-0011.xml?format=INT
id doaj-30539ad637d1412da3562dc9bc2148f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-30539ad637d1412da3562dc9bc2148f52021-10-02T08:39:48ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692016-09-012110.1515/opli-2016-0011opli-2016-0011L1 Conceptual Transfer in the Acquisition of L2 Motion Events in Spanish and English: The Thinking-for-Speaking HypothesisSharpen Rosalie0The English Centre, Barcelona, SpainThis research paper takes and builds upon Slobin’s (1987) thinking-for-speaking hypothesis as a basis for exploring the notion of conceptual transfer from the L1 in the acquisition and production of motion events in an L2. This is achieved by investigating the extent to which L2 transfer presents itself in the expression of motion in inverse translation tasks carried out by 27 native English speaking learners of Spanish and 32 native Spanish speaking learners of English. The nature of this transfer is then investigated to establish whether or not it appears to be conceptual. The tasks presented to participants contained items based on Talmy’s (1985) research on cross-linguistic lexicalisation patterns in the expression of motion events, which, as Slobin (1987, 1996) later proposes, appear to dictate the conceptualisation of motion events in a language. Results reveal that cognitive parameters in the participants’ native language affected their performance in the production of motion events in their second language, in accord with Slobin’s (1987) thinking-for-speaking hypothesis. Finally, the study concludes with a summary of these results.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opli.2016.2.issue-1/opli-2016-0011/opli-2016-0011.xml?format=INTthinking-for-speaking verb conflation patterns language typology second language acquisition semantics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sharpen Rosalie
spellingShingle Sharpen Rosalie
L1 Conceptual Transfer in the Acquisition of L2 Motion Events in Spanish and English: The Thinking-for-Speaking Hypothesis
Open Linguistics
thinking-for-speaking
verb conflation patterns
language typology
second language acquisition
semantics
author_facet Sharpen Rosalie
author_sort Sharpen Rosalie
title L1 Conceptual Transfer in the Acquisition of L2 Motion Events in Spanish and English: The Thinking-for-Speaking Hypothesis
title_short L1 Conceptual Transfer in the Acquisition of L2 Motion Events in Spanish and English: The Thinking-for-Speaking Hypothesis
title_full L1 Conceptual Transfer in the Acquisition of L2 Motion Events in Spanish and English: The Thinking-for-Speaking Hypothesis
title_fullStr L1 Conceptual Transfer in the Acquisition of L2 Motion Events in Spanish and English: The Thinking-for-Speaking Hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed L1 Conceptual Transfer in the Acquisition of L2 Motion Events in Spanish and English: The Thinking-for-Speaking Hypothesis
title_sort l1 conceptual transfer in the acquisition of l2 motion events in spanish and english: the thinking-for-speaking hypothesis
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Linguistics
issn 2300-9969
publishDate 2016-09-01
description This research paper takes and builds upon Slobin’s (1987) thinking-for-speaking hypothesis as a basis for exploring the notion of conceptual transfer from the L1 in the acquisition and production of motion events in an L2. This is achieved by investigating the extent to which L2 transfer presents itself in the expression of motion in inverse translation tasks carried out by 27 native English speaking learners of Spanish and 32 native Spanish speaking learners of English. The nature of this transfer is then investigated to establish whether or not it appears to be conceptual. The tasks presented to participants contained items based on Talmy’s (1985) research on cross-linguistic lexicalisation patterns in the expression of motion events, which, as Slobin (1987, 1996) later proposes, appear to dictate the conceptualisation of motion events in a language. Results reveal that cognitive parameters in the participants’ native language affected their performance in the production of motion events in their second language, in accord with Slobin’s (1987) thinking-for-speaking hypothesis. Finally, the study concludes with a summary of these results.
topic thinking-for-speaking
verb conflation patterns
language typology
second language acquisition
semantics
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opli.2016.2.issue-1/opli-2016-0011/opli-2016-0011.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT sharpenrosalie l1conceptualtransferintheacquisitionofl2motioneventsinspanishandenglishthethinkingforspeakinghypothesis
_version_ 1716856826455130112