A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image.

<h4>Objective</h4>Numerous stand-alone interventions to improve body image have been developed. The present review used meta-analysis to estimate the effectiveness of such interventions, and to identify the specific change techniques that lead to improvement in body image.<h4>Metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica M Alleva, Paschal Sheeran, Thomas L Webb, Carolien Martijn, Eleanor Miles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139177
id doaj-3060125db07b4247a7a2480b10d73bc5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3060125db07b4247a7a2480b10d73bc52021-03-04T07:26:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01109e013917710.1371/journal.pone.0139177A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image.Jessica M AllevaPaschal SheeranThomas L WebbCarolien MartijnEleanor Miles<h4>Objective</h4>Numerous stand-alone interventions to improve body image have been developed. The present review used meta-analysis to estimate the effectiveness of such interventions, and to identify the specific change techniques that lead to improvement in body image.<h4>Methods</h4>The inclusion criteria were that (a) the intervention was stand-alone (i.e., solely focused on improving body image), (b) a control group was used, (c) participants were randomly assigned to conditions, and (d) at least one pretest and one posttest measure of body image was taken. Effect sizes were meta-analysed and moderator analyses were conducted. A taxonomy of 48 change techniques used in interventions targeted at body image was developed; all interventions were coded using this taxonomy.<h4>Results</h4>The literature search identified 62 tests of interventions (N = 3,846). Interventions produced a small-to-medium improvement in body image (d+ = 0.38), a small-to-medium reduction in beauty ideal internalisation (d+ = -0.37), and a large reduction in social comparison tendencies (d+ = -0.72). However, the effect size for body image was inflated by bias both within and across studies, and was reliable but of small magnitude once corrections for bias were applied. Effect sizes for the other outcomes were no longer reliable once corrections for bias were applied. Several features of the sample, intervention, and methodology moderated intervention effects. Twelve change techniques were associated with improvements in body image, and three techniques were contra-indicated.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The findings show that interventions engender only small improvements in body image, and underline the need for large-scale, high-quality trials in this area. The review identifies effective techniques that could be deployed in future interventions.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139177
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jessica M Alleva
Paschal Sheeran
Thomas L Webb
Carolien Martijn
Eleanor Miles
spellingShingle Jessica M Alleva
Paschal Sheeran
Thomas L Webb
Carolien Martijn
Eleanor Miles
A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jessica M Alleva
Paschal Sheeran
Thomas L Webb
Carolien Martijn
Eleanor Miles
author_sort Jessica M Alleva
title A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image.
title_short A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image.
title_full A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image.
title_fullStr A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image.
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image.
title_sort meta-analytic review of stand-alone interventions to improve body image.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description <h4>Objective</h4>Numerous stand-alone interventions to improve body image have been developed. The present review used meta-analysis to estimate the effectiveness of such interventions, and to identify the specific change techniques that lead to improvement in body image.<h4>Methods</h4>The inclusion criteria were that (a) the intervention was stand-alone (i.e., solely focused on improving body image), (b) a control group was used, (c) participants were randomly assigned to conditions, and (d) at least one pretest and one posttest measure of body image was taken. Effect sizes were meta-analysed and moderator analyses were conducted. A taxonomy of 48 change techniques used in interventions targeted at body image was developed; all interventions were coded using this taxonomy.<h4>Results</h4>The literature search identified 62 tests of interventions (N = 3,846). Interventions produced a small-to-medium improvement in body image (d+ = 0.38), a small-to-medium reduction in beauty ideal internalisation (d+ = -0.37), and a large reduction in social comparison tendencies (d+ = -0.72). However, the effect size for body image was inflated by bias both within and across studies, and was reliable but of small magnitude once corrections for bias were applied. Effect sizes for the other outcomes were no longer reliable once corrections for bias were applied. Several features of the sample, intervention, and methodology moderated intervention effects. Twelve change techniques were associated with improvements in body image, and three techniques were contra-indicated.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The findings show that interventions engender only small improvements in body image, and underline the need for large-scale, high-quality trials in this area. The review identifies effective techniques that could be deployed in future interventions.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139177
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicamalleva ametaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
AT paschalsheeran ametaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
AT thomaslwebb ametaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
AT carolienmartijn ametaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
AT eleanormiles ametaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
AT jessicamalleva metaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
AT paschalsheeran metaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
AT thomaslwebb metaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
AT carolienmartijn metaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
AT eleanormiles metaanalyticreviewofstandaloneinterventionstoimprovebodyimage
_version_ 1714808248144494592