Liu Xiaobo and “Charter 08”: Freedom of Expression and Cultural Relativism

Late Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo represents the fate of a typical case of a dissident in contemporary China under the Communist regime. The Communist China regime always defends against any criticism of its human rights records, in particular freedom of expression cases like Liu Xiaobo, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Patrick Kar-wai Poon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Sun Yat-sen University 2018-07-01
Series:Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rpb115.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/2374/375717122.pdf
id doaj-308e2f8ed4cf447e9a01eb79becf166f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-308e2f8ed4cf447e9a01eb79becf166f2020-11-24T22:02:22ZengNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityContemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal2410-96812410-96812018-07-0142349367Liu Xiaobo and “Charter 08”: Freedom of Expression and Cultural RelativismPatrick Kar-wai Poon0Amnesty International / University of Lyon, FranceLate Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo represents the fate of a typical case of a dissident in contemporary China under the Communist regime. The Communist China regime always defends against any criticism of its human rights records, in particular freedom of expression cases like Liu Xiaobo, and brands any such criticism as “interfering with China’s internal affairs” and claims that China is a rule of law country, although what it really means is rule by law under an authoritarian regime but not the Western concept of rule of law. Through looking at Liu Xiaobo’s case and China’s defense of its human rights record with cultural relativist arguments, this article aims at arguing how the Communist China regime fails to address its increasingly significant role in the global community and how the current Chinese regime cannot deny the fact that it is also part of the universalist narrative of human rights concepts as being a core member of international organizations like the United Nations. Therefore, it can only reflect and represent the reality if China can acknowledge the fact that John Rawls’ theory on reflective equilibrium on justice is applicable instead of merely defending itself with cultural relativism and defying the duty of fulfilling the obligation of being a major player in the international community.http://rpb115.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/2374/375717122.pdfChinacensorshipfreedomdissidents
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrick Kar-wai Poon
spellingShingle Patrick Kar-wai Poon
Liu Xiaobo and “Charter 08”: Freedom of Expression and Cultural Relativism
Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal
China
censorship
freedom
dissidents
author_facet Patrick Kar-wai Poon
author_sort Patrick Kar-wai Poon
title Liu Xiaobo and “Charter 08”: Freedom of Expression and Cultural Relativism
title_short Liu Xiaobo and “Charter 08”: Freedom of Expression and Cultural Relativism
title_full Liu Xiaobo and “Charter 08”: Freedom of Expression and Cultural Relativism
title_fullStr Liu Xiaobo and “Charter 08”: Freedom of Expression and Cultural Relativism
title_full_unstemmed Liu Xiaobo and “Charter 08”: Freedom of Expression and Cultural Relativism
title_sort liu xiaobo and “charter 08”: freedom of expression and cultural relativism
publisher National Sun Yat-sen University
series Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal
issn 2410-9681
2410-9681
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Late Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo represents the fate of a typical case of a dissident in contemporary China under the Communist regime. The Communist China regime always defends against any criticism of its human rights records, in particular freedom of expression cases like Liu Xiaobo, and brands any such criticism as “interfering with China’s internal affairs” and claims that China is a rule of law country, although what it really means is rule by law under an authoritarian regime but not the Western concept of rule of law. Through looking at Liu Xiaobo’s case and China’s defense of its human rights record with cultural relativist arguments, this article aims at arguing how the Communist China regime fails to address its increasingly significant role in the global community and how the current Chinese regime cannot deny the fact that it is also part of the universalist narrative of human rights concepts as being a core member of international organizations like the United Nations. Therefore, it can only reflect and represent the reality if China can acknowledge the fact that John Rawls’ theory on reflective equilibrium on justice is applicable instead of merely defending itself with cultural relativism and defying the duty of fulfilling the obligation of being a major player in the international community.
topic China
censorship
freedom
dissidents
url http://rpb115.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/2374/375717122.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickkarwaipoon liuxiaoboandcharter08freedomofexpressionandculturalrelativism
_version_ 1725836244055752704