A Complex MCDM Procedure for the Assessment of Economic Development of Units at Different Government Levels

Studies on the economic development of government units are among the key challenges for authorities at different levels and an issue often investigated by economists. In spite of a considerable interest in the issue, there is no standard procedure for the assessment of economic development level of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleksandra Łuczak, Małgorzata Just
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/7/1067
id doaj-30ad9da943d3466d8cf1acf1404e8225
record_format Article
spelling doaj-30ad9da943d3466d8cf1acf1404e82252020-11-25T03:13:23ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902020-07-0181067106710.3390/math8071067A Complex MCDM Procedure for the Assessment of Economic Development of Units at Different Government LevelsAleksandra Łuczak0Małgorzata Just1Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, PolandDepartment of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, PolandStudies on the economic development of government units are among the key challenges for authorities at different levels and an issue often investigated by economists. In spite of a considerable interest in the issue, there is no standard procedure for the assessment of economic development level of units at different levels of government (national, regional, sub-regional). This assessment needs a complex system of methods and techniques applicable to the various types of data. So, adequate methods must be used at each level. This paper proposes a complex procedure for a synthetic indicator. The units are assessed at different government levels. Each level (national, regional, and sub-regional) may be described with a particular type of variables. Set of data may include variables with a normal or near-normal distribution, a strong asymmetry or extreme values. The objective of this paper is to present the potential behind the application of a complex Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) procedure based on the tail selection method used in the Extreme Value Theory (EVT), i.e., Mean Excess Function (MEF) together with one of the most popular MCDM methods, namely the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), to assess the economic development level of units at different government levels. MEF is helpful to identify extreme values of variables and limit their impact on the ranking of local administrative units (LAUs). TOPSIS is suitable in ranking units described with multidimensional data set. The study explored the use of two types of TOPSIS (classical and positional) depending on the type of variables. These approaches were used in the assessment of economic development level of LAUs at national, regional and sub-regional levels in Poland in 2017.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/7/1067Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)Extreme Value Theory (EVT)Mean Excess Function (MEF)synthetic measureeconomic development levellocal administrative units
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aleksandra Łuczak
Małgorzata Just
spellingShingle Aleksandra Łuczak
Małgorzata Just
A Complex MCDM Procedure for the Assessment of Economic Development of Units at Different Government Levels
Mathematics
Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
Extreme Value Theory (EVT)
Mean Excess Function (MEF)
synthetic measure
economic development level
local administrative units
author_facet Aleksandra Łuczak
Małgorzata Just
author_sort Aleksandra Łuczak
title A Complex MCDM Procedure for the Assessment of Economic Development of Units at Different Government Levels
title_short A Complex MCDM Procedure for the Assessment of Economic Development of Units at Different Government Levels
title_full A Complex MCDM Procedure for the Assessment of Economic Development of Units at Different Government Levels
title_fullStr A Complex MCDM Procedure for the Assessment of Economic Development of Units at Different Government Levels
title_full_unstemmed A Complex MCDM Procedure for the Assessment of Economic Development of Units at Different Government Levels
title_sort complex mcdm procedure for the assessment of economic development of units at different government levels
publisher MDPI AG
series Mathematics
issn 2227-7390
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Studies on the economic development of government units are among the key challenges for authorities at different levels and an issue often investigated by economists. In spite of a considerable interest in the issue, there is no standard procedure for the assessment of economic development level of units at different levels of government (national, regional, sub-regional). This assessment needs a complex system of methods and techniques applicable to the various types of data. So, adequate methods must be used at each level. This paper proposes a complex procedure for a synthetic indicator. The units are assessed at different government levels. Each level (national, regional, and sub-regional) may be described with a particular type of variables. Set of data may include variables with a normal or near-normal distribution, a strong asymmetry or extreme values. The objective of this paper is to present the potential behind the application of a complex Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) procedure based on the tail selection method used in the Extreme Value Theory (EVT), i.e., Mean Excess Function (MEF) together with one of the most popular MCDM methods, namely the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), to assess the economic development level of units at different government levels. MEF is helpful to identify extreme values of variables and limit their impact on the ranking of local administrative units (LAUs). TOPSIS is suitable in ranking units described with multidimensional data set. The study explored the use of two types of TOPSIS (classical and positional) depending on the type of variables. These approaches were used in the assessment of economic development level of LAUs at national, regional and sub-regional levels in Poland in 2017.
topic Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
Extreme Value Theory (EVT)
Mean Excess Function (MEF)
synthetic measure
economic development level
local administrative units
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/7/1067
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandrałuczak acomplexmcdmprocedurefortheassessmentofeconomicdevelopmentofunitsatdifferentgovernmentlevels
AT małgorzatajust acomplexmcdmprocedurefortheassessmentofeconomicdevelopmentofunitsatdifferentgovernmentlevels
AT aleksandrałuczak complexmcdmprocedurefortheassessmentofeconomicdevelopmentofunitsatdifferentgovernmentlevels
AT małgorzatajust complexmcdmprocedurefortheassessmentofeconomicdevelopmentofunitsatdifferentgovernmentlevels
_version_ 1724647119382380544