Laparoscopic elective cholecystectomy with and without drain: A controlled randomised trial

• Main Authors: Gouda El-labban, Emad Hokkam, Mohamed El-labban, Ali Saber, Khaled Heissam, Soliman El-Kammash
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
• Series: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
• Subjects: Cholecystectomy; drain; hospital stay; laparoscopy; postoperative pain; wound infection
• Online Access: http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2012;volume=8;issue=3;spage=90;epage=92;aulast=El-labban

Background : Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the main method of treatment of symptomatic gallstones. Routine drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an issue of considerable debate. Therefore, a controlled randomised trial was designed to assess the value of drains in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: During a two-year period (From April 2008 to January 2010), 80 patients were simply randomised to have a drain placed (group A), an 8-mm pentose tube drain was retained below the liver bed, whereas 80 patients were randomised not to have a drain (group B) placed in the subhepatic space. End points of this trial were to detect any differences in morbidity, postoperative pain, wound infection and hospital stay between the two groups. Results : There was no mortality in either group and no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, wound infection or abdominal collection between the two groups. However, hospital stay was longer in the drain group than in group without drain and it is appearing that the use of drain delays hospital discharge. Conclusion : The routine use of a drain in non-complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy has nothing to offer; in contrast, it is associated with longer hospital stay.