Promoter choice: Who should drive the CAR in T cells?

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an effective treatment for B cell malignancies, with emerging potential for the treatment of other hematologic cancers and solid tumors. The strength of the promoter within the CAR cassette will alter CAR-polypeptide levels on the cell surface of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Hosseini Rad S M, Aarati Poudel, Grace Min Yi Tan, Alexander D McLellan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232915
id doaj-30e3408f75df4963958e005581722360
record_format Article
spelling doaj-30e3408f75df4963958e0055817223602021-03-03T21:53:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01157e023291510.1371/journal.pone.0232915Promoter choice: Who should drive the CAR in T cells?Ali Hosseini Rad S MAarati PoudelGrace Min Yi TanAlexander D McLellanChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an effective treatment for B cell malignancies, with emerging potential for the treatment of other hematologic cancers and solid tumors. The strength of the promoter within the CAR cassette will alter CAR-polypeptide levels on the cell surface of the T cell-impacting on the kinetics of activation, survival and memory cell formation in T cells. In addition to the CAR, promoters can be used to drive other genes of interest to enhance CAR T cell function. Expressing multiple genes from a single RNA transcript can be effectively achieved by linking the genes via a ribosomal skip site. However, promoters may differ in their ability to transcribe longer RNAs, or could interfere with lentiviral production, or transduction frequencies. In this study we compared the ability of the strong well-characterized promoters CMV, EF-1, hPGK and RPBSA to drive functional expression of a single RNA encoding three products: GFP, CAR, plus an additional cell-survival gene, Mcl-1. Although the four promoters produced similarly high lentiviral titres, EF-1 gave the best transduction efficacy of primary T cells. Major differences were found in the ability of the promoters to drive expression of long RNA encoding GFP, CAR and Mcl-1, highlighting promoter choice as an important consideration for gene therapy applications requiring the expression of long and complex mRNA.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232915
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Hosseini Rad S M
Aarati Poudel
Grace Min Yi Tan
Alexander D McLellan
spellingShingle Ali Hosseini Rad S M
Aarati Poudel
Grace Min Yi Tan
Alexander D McLellan
Promoter choice: Who should drive the CAR in T cells?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ali Hosseini Rad S M
Aarati Poudel
Grace Min Yi Tan
Alexander D McLellan
author_sort Ali Hosseini Rad S M
title Promoter choice: Who should drive the CAR in T cells?
title_short Promoter choice: Who should drive the CAR in T cells?
title_full Promoter choice: Who should drive the CAR in T cells?
title_fullStr Promoter choice: Who should drive the CAR in T cells?
title_full_unstemmed Promoter choice: Who should drive the CAR in T cells?
title_sort promoter choice: who should drive the car in t cells?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an effective treatment for B cell malignancies, with emerging potential for the treatment of other hematologic cancers and solid tumors. The strength of the promoter within the CAR cassette will alter CAR-polypeptide levels on the cell surface of the T cell-impacting on the kinetics of activation, survival and memory cell formation in T cells. In addition to the CAR, promoters can be used to drive other genes of interest to enhance CAR T cell function. Expressing multiple genes from a single RNA transcript can be effectively achieved by linking the genes via a ribosomal skip site. However, promoters may differ in their ability to transcribe longer RNAs, or could interfere with lentiviral production, or transduction frequencies. In this study we compared the ability of the strong well-characterized promoters CMV, EF-1, hPGK and RPBSA to drive functional expression of a single RNA encoding three products: GFP, CAR, plus an additional cell-survival gene, Mcl-1. Although the four promoters produced similarly high lentiviral titres, EF-1 gave the best transduction efficacy of primary T cells. Major differences were found in the ability of the promoters to drive expression of long RNA encoding GFP, CAR and Mcl-1, highlighting promoter choice as an important consideration for gene therapy applications requiring the expression of long and complex mRNA.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232915
work_keys_str_mv AT alihosseiniradsm promoterchoicewhoshoulddrivethecarintcells
AT aaratipoudel promoterchoicewhoshoulddrivethecarintcells
AT graceminyitan promoterchoicewhoshoulddrivethecarintcells
AT alexanderdmclellan promoterchoicewhoshoulddrivethecarintcells
_version_ 1714814526780604416