How taxonomic misidentifications affect phylogenetic taxonomy: on voucher specimens used in García-Melo et al. (2019)

Here I evaluate the taxonomic identifications used in García-Melo et al. (2019; GMEA hereafter) to infer the phylogenetic relationships among 372 fish species within the Stevardiinae (Characidae). The taxonomic assessment presented in this paper was based on taxa within my area of expertise, repres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: César Román-Valencia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Goiás 2021-01-01
Series:Revista de Biologia Neotropical
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.revistas.ufg.br/RBN/article/view/64597
id doaj-310cfd0113934c0385f25a34a8dc6f02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-310cfd0113934c0385f25a34a8dc6f022021-07-02T14:19:43ZengUniversidade Federal de GoiásRevista de Biologia Neotropical1807-96522178-05792021-01-01181How taxonomic misidentifications affect phylogenetic taxonomy: on voucher specimens used in García-Melo et al. (2019)César Román-Valencia0Universidad del Quindío Here I evaluate the taxonomic identifications used in García-Melo et al. (2019; GMEA hereafter) to infer the phylogenetic relationships among 372 fish species within the Stevardiinae (Characidae). The taxonomic assessment presented in this paper was based on taxa within my area of expertise, representing 13% of the species sampled in GMEA (59 of 372) and comprising species historically classified under Bryconamericus (21 species in GMEA), Carlastyanax (one species), Eretmobrycon (nine species), Hemibrycon (eight species), and Knodus (20 species). I compared the geographical overlap between collection localities in GMEA to the known geographic ranges for 59 taxa. I detected potential taxonomic misidentifications in 17% of the taxa here evaluated (10 of 59 species). Finally, I provide additional details on (i) why taxa were misidentified in GMEA and (ii) how phylogenetic conclusions were potentially compromised by taxonomic errors. https://www.revistas.ufg.br/RBN/article/view/64597CharacidaefishesNeotropicalSouth AmericaSystematics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author César Román-Valencia
spellingShingle César Román-Valencia
How taxonomic misidentifications affect phylogenetic taxonomy: on voucher specimens used in García-Melo et al. (2019)
Revista de Biologia Neotropical
Characidae
fishes
Neotropical
South America
Systematics
author_facet César Román-Valencia
author_sort César Román-Valencia
title How taxonomic misidentifications affect phylogenetic taxonomy: on voucher specimens used in García-Melo et al. (2019)
title_short How taxonomic misidentifications affect phylogenetic taxonomy: on voucher specimens used in García-Melo et al. (2019)
title_full How taxonomic misidentifications affect phylogenetic taxonomy: on voucher specimens used in García-Melo et al. (2019)
title_fullStr How taxonomic misidentifications affect phylogenetic taxonomy: on voucher specimens used in García-Melo et al. (2019)
title_full_unstemmed How taxonomic misidentifications affect phylogenetic taxonomy: on voucher specimens used in García-Melo et al. (2019)
title_sort how taxonomic misidentifications affect phylogenetic taxonomy: on voucher specimens used in garcía-melo et al. (2019)
publisher Universidade Federal de Goiás
series Revista de Biologia Neotropical
issn 1807-9652
2178-0579
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Here I evaluate the taxonomic identifications used in García-Melo et al. (2019; GMEA hereafter) to infer the phylogenetic relationships among 372 fish species within the Stevardiinae (Characidae). The taxonomic assessment presented in this paper was based on taxa within my area of expertise, representing 13% of the species sampled in GMEA (59 of 372) and comprising species historically classified under Bryconamericus (21 species in GMEA), Carlastyanax (one species), Eretmobrycon (nine species), Hemibrycon (eight species), and Knodus (20 species). I compared the geographical overlap between collection localities in GMEA to the known geographic ranges for 59 taxa. I detected potential taxonomic misidentifications in 17% of the taxa here evaluated (10 of 59 species). Finally, I provide additional details on (i) why taxa were misidentified in GMEA and (ii) how phylogenetic conclusions were potentially compromised by taxonomic errors.
topic Characidae
fishes
Neotropical
South America
Systematics
url https://www.revistas.ufg.br/RBN/article/view/64597
work_keys_str_mv AT cesarromanvalencia howtaxonomicmisidentificationsaffectphylogenetictaxonomyonvoucherspecimensusedingarciameloetal2019
_version_ 1721328025855852544