Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedy

Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedy

Show other versions (1)

The theme of this research article is focused on the question about the importance of the dionysianisms in the Nietzsche’s Philosophy in <em>The Born of Tragedy</em>. The central question of the existence in the Greece’s chorus the Dionysus’ presence, the role of Dionysus in the last Eur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teodoro Manuel Mora Mínguez
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: CENALTES 2014-07-01
Series:HYBRIS: Revista de Filosofía
Subjects:
lo dionisíaco
Hybris
coro griego
desmitificación
Online Access:http://localhost/revistas/index.php/hybris/article/view/51
id doaj-3135fa5ab860465080acc6e1f37c2250
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3135fa5ab860465080acc6e1f37c22502020-11-25T03:37:36ZspaCENALTESHYBRIS: Revista de Filosofía0718-83822014-07-0150879951Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedyTeodoro Manuel Mora Mínguez0Universidad Complutense de MadridThe theme of this research article is focused on the question about the importance of the dionysianisms in the Nietzsche’s Philosophy in <em>The Born of Tragedy</em>. The central question of the existence in the Greece’s chorus the Dionysus’ presence, the role of Dionysus in the last Euripides’s theatric works and the relation of this author with the Socrates’ intellectualism. These are some of the fundamental elements which will be studied in this article. For getting it, we suggested a theatric ride around these different protagonists of this story, which is the same History of Occident. So, through these pages will pass: Euripides, Socrates, Silenus, Midas’s King and include an atypical Cynic Diogenes, oddly enough closer to the Nietzsche later to <em>The Born of Tragedy</em>http://localhost/revistas/index.php/hybris/article/view/51lo dionisíacoHybriscoro griegodesmitificación
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Teodoro Manuel Mora Mínguez
spellingShingle Teodoro Manuel Mora Mínguez
Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedy
HYBRIS: Revista de Filosofía
lo dionisíaco
Hybris
coro griego
desmitificación
author_facet Teodoro Manuel Mora Mínguez
author_sort Teodoro Manuel Mora Mínguez
title Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedy
title_short Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedy
title_full Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedy
title_fullStr Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedy
title_full_unstemmed Nietzsche, Euripides, Diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the Greek demythologization to the modern secularization. Commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of The birth of tragedy
title_sort nietzsche, euripides, diogenes: the “impossible dialogue” about the inversion of values from the greek demythologization to the modern secularization. commentary on the paragraphs 12 and 13 of the birth of tragedy
publisher CENALTES
series HYBRIS: Revista de Filosofía
issn 0718-8382
publishDate 2014-07-01
description The theme of this research article is focused on the question about the importance of the dionysianisms in the Nietzsche’s Philosophy in <em>The Born of Tragedy</em>. The central question of the existence in the Greece’s chorus the Dionysus’ presence, the role of Dionysus in the last Euripides’s theatric works and the relation of this author with the Socrates’ intellectualism. These are some of the fundamental elements which will be studied in this article. For getting it, we suggested a theatric ride around these different protagonists of this story, which is the same History of Occident. So, through these pages will pass: Euripides, Socrates, Silenus, Midas’s King and include an atypical Cynic Diogenes, oddly enough closer to the Nietzsche later to <em>The Born of Tragedy</em>
topic lo dionisíaco
Hybris
coro griego
desmitificación
url http://localhost/revistas/index.php/hybris/article/view/51
work_keys_str_mv AT teodoromanuelmoraminguez nietzscheeuripidesdiogenestheimpossibledialogueabouttheinversionofvaluesfromthegreekdemythologizationtothemodernsecularizationcommentaryontheparagraphs12and13ofthebirthoftragedy
_version_ 1724545093488082944

Similar Items