Patient Safety Policy in Long-Term Care: A Research Protocol to Assess Executive WalkRounds to Improve Management of Early Warning Signs for Patient Safety

BackgroundAt many hospitals and long-term care organizations (such as nursing homes), executive board members have a responsibility to manage patient safety. Executive WalkRounds offer an opportunity for boards to build a trusting relationship with professionals and seem usef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van Dusseldorp, Loes, Hamers, Hub, van Achterberg, Theo, Schoonhoven, Lisette
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2014-07-01
Series:JMIR Research Protocols
Online Access:http://www.researchprotocols.org/2014/3/e36/
id doaj-3139f5e603104cde9977012cf5c4fd2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3139f5e603104cde9977012cf5c4fd2a2021-05-03T01:40:51ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482014-07-0133e3610.2196/resprot.3256Patient Safety Policy in Long-Term Care: A Research Protocol to Assess Executive WalkRounds to Improve Management of Early Warning Signs for Patient Safetyvan Dusseldorp, LoesHamers, Hubvan Achterberg, TheoSchoonhoven, Lisette BackgroundAt many hospitals and long-term care organizations (such as nursing homes), executive board members have a responsibility to manage patient safety. Executive WalkRounds offer an opportunity for boards to build a trusting relationship with professionals and seem useful as a leadership tool to pick up on soft signals, which are indirect signals or early warnings that something is wrong. Because the majority of the research on WalkRounds has been performed in hospitals, it is unknown how board members of long-term care organizations develop their patient safety policy. Also, it is not clear if these board members use soft signals as a leadership tool and, if so, how this influences their patient safety policies. ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore the added value and the feasibility of WalkRounds for patient safety management in long-term care. This study also aims to identify how executive board members of long-term care organizations manage patient safety and to describe the characteristics of boards. MethodsAn explorative before-and-after study was conducted between April 2012 and February 2014 in 13 long-term care organizations in the Netherlands. After implementing the intervention in 6 organizations, data from 72 WalkRounds were gathered by observation and a reporting form. Before and after the intervention period, data collection included interviews, questionnaires, and studying reports of the executive boards. A mixed-method analysis is performed using descriptive statistics, t tests, and content analysis. ResultsResults are expected to be ready in mid 2014. ConclusionsIt is a challenge to keep track of ongoing development and implementation of patient safety management tools in long-term care. By performing this study in cooperation with the participating long-term care organizations, insight into the potential added value and the feasibility of this method will increase.http://www.researchprotocols.org/2014/3/e36/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author van Dusseldorp, Loes
Hamers, Hub
van Achterberg, Theo
Schoonhoven, Lisette
spellingShingle van Dusseldorp, Loes
Hamers, Hub
van Achterberg, Theo
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Patient Safety Policy in Long-Term Care: A Research Protocol to Assess Executive WalkRounds to Improve Management of Early Warning Signs for Patient Safety
JMIR Research Protocols
author_facet van Dusseldorp, Loes
Hamers, Hub
van Achterberg, Theo
Schoonhoven, Lisette
author_sort van Dusseldorp, Loes
title Patient Safety Policy in Long-Term Care: A Research Protocol to Assess Executive WalkRounds to Improve Management of Early Warning Signs for Patient Safety
title_short Patient Safety Policy in Long-Term Care: A Research Protocol to Assess Executive WalkRounds to Improve Management of Early Warning Signs for Patient Safety
title_full Patient Safety Policy in Long-Term Care: A Research Protocol to Assess Executive WalkRounds to Improve Management of Early Warning Signs for Patient Safety
title_fullStr Patient Safety Policy in Long-Term Care: A Research Protocol to Assess Executive WalkRounds to Improve Management of Early Warning Signs for Patient Safety
title_full_unstemmed Patient Safety Policy in Long-Term Care: A Research Protocol to Assess Executive WalkRounds to Improve Management of Early Warning Signs for Patient Safety
title_sort patient safety policy in long-term care: a research protocol to assess executive walkrounds to improve management of early warning signs for patient safety
publisher JMIR Publications
series JMIR Research Protocols
issn 1929-0748
publishDate 2014-07-01
description BackgroundAt many hospitals and long-term care organizations (such as nursing homes), executive board members have a responsibility to manage patient safety. Executive WalkRounds offer an opportunity for boards to build a trusting relationship with professionals and seem useful as a leadership tool to pick up on soft signals, which are indirect signals or early warnings that something is wrong. Because the majority of the research on WalkRounds has been performed in hospitals, it is unknown how board members of long-term care organizations develop their patient safety policy. Also, it is not clear if these board members use soft signals as a leadership tool and, if so, how this influences their patient safety policies. ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore the added value and the feasibility of WalkRounds for patient safety management in long-term care. This study also aims to identify how executive board members of long-term care organizations manage patient safety and to describe the characteristics of boards. MethodsAn explorative before-and-after study was conducted between April 2012 and February 2014 in 13 long-term care organizations in the Netherlands. After implementing the intervention in 6 organizations, data from 72 WalkRounds were gathered by observation and a reporting form. Before and after the intervention period, data collection included interviews, questionnaires, and studying reports of the executive boards. A mixed-method analysis is performed using descriptive statistics, t tests, and content analysis. ResultsResults are expected to be ready in mid 2014. ConclusionsIt is a challenge to keep track of ongoing development and implementation of patient safety management tools in long-term care. By performing this study in cooperation with the participating long-term care organizations, insight into the potential added value and the feasibility of this method will increase.
url http://www.researchprotocols.org/2014/3/e36/
work_keys_str_mv AT vandusseldorploes patientsafetypolicyinlongtermcarearesearchprotocoltoassessexecutivewalkroundstoimprovemanagementofearlywarningsignsforpatientsafety
AT hamershub patientsafetypolicyinlongtermcarearesearchprotocoltoassessexecutivewalkroundstoimprovemanagementofearlywarningsignsforpatientsafety
AT vanachterbergtheo patientsafetypolicyinlongtermcarearesearchprotocoltoassessexecutivewalkroundstoimprovemanagementofearlywarningsignsforpatientsafety
AT schoonhovenlisette patientsafetypolicyinlongtermcarearesearchprotocoltoassessexecutivewalkroundstoimprovemanagementofearlywarningsignsforpatientsafety
_version_ 1721485788663775232