What makes a topic “relevant” to journal editors?
n/a
Main Authors: | Sara Palacio, Adrián Escudero |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Queen's University
2015-02-01
|
Series: | Ideas in Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/IEE/article/view/5222 |
Similar Items
-
Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals
by: Steven Cooke, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01) -
Peer review golden rules and good practice checklist
by: Irene Hames
Published: (2016-02-01) -
Substandard Journal Management: Wastage of Authors’ Motivation
by: Shahryar Sorooshian, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Are editors of ecological journals good oracles? A reply to Schimel et al. (2014) about the malpractice of editorial rejections
by: Alejandro G. Farji-Brener, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01) -
Peer Review in Controversial Topics—A Case Study of 9/11
by: John D. Wyndham
Published: (2017-06-01)