Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients

Emilio Rintaro Suzuki Jr1, Cibele Lima Belico Suzuki1, Danielle Carlier1, Daniele Penha1, Marta dos Anjos Rodrigues Parchen1, Wagner Duarte Batista1, Joao Agostini Netto21Glaucoma Service, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilBackground: The purpose of this study was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parchen MAR, Penha D, Agostini Netto J, Batista WD, Carlier D, Suzuki CLB, Suzuki Jr ER
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2012-04-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/dynamic-contour-tonometry-in-asymmetric-glaucoma-patients-a9674
id doaj-316a1609cdf94e4bb8de7e5954e36edf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-316a1609cdf94e4bb8de7e5954e36edf2020-11-25T01:11:18ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54671177-54832012-04-012012default555559Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patientsParchen MARPenha DAgostini Netto JBatista WDCarlier DSuzuki CLBSuzuki Jr EREmilio Rintaro Suzuki Jr1, Cibele Lima Belico Suzuki1, Danielle Carlier1, Daniele Penha1, Marta dos Anjos Rodrigues Parchen1, Wagner Duarte Batista1, Joao Agostini Netto21Glaucoma Service, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilBackground: The purpose of this study was to determine any difference in dynamic contour tonometry and ocular pulse amplitude in asymmetric glaucoma patients with the same applanation intraocular pressure.Methods: This is a prospective, observational study of 30 glaucoma patients and 11 controls from June 2007 to February 2008. Most of the glaucoma patients were on prostaglandin analog treatment.Results: Mean applanation intraocular pressure in the control group was 14.28 mmHg for the right eye and 14.10 mmHg for the left eye (P > 0.05). Corneal thickness was 519.10 µm for the right eye and 511.07 µm for the left eye (P > 0.05). Mean dynamic contour tonometry intraocular pressure was 17.28 mmHg for the right eye and 17.25 mmHg for the left eye (P > 0.05). Mean ocular pulse amplitude was 2.80 mmHg for the right eye and 2.92 mmHg for the left eye (P > 0.05).Conclusion: No differences in ocular pulse amplitude were found between the two groups and between the worst and the best eye. In spite of there being no difference in ocular pulse amplitude, dynamic contour tonometry intraocular pressure was 2.44 mmHg higher in the worst eye than in the best eye in the glaucoma patients, even with the same applanation intraocular pressure. Further studies are needed to confirm if this difference is related to glaucoma progression or a worst prognosis and whether it can be considered to be a new risk factor.Keywords: dynamic contour tonometry, central cornea thickness, assymetric glaucomahttp://www.dovepress.com/dynamic-contour-tonometry-in-asymmetric-glaucoma-patients-a9674
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Parchen MAR
Penha D
Agostini Netto J
Batista WD
Carlier D
Suzuki CLB
Suzuki Jr ER
spellingShingle Parchen MAR
Penha D
Agostini Netto J
Batista WD
Carlier D
Suzuki CLB
Suzuki Jr ER
Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients
Clinical Ophthalmology
author_facet Parchen MAR
Penha D
Agostini Netto J
Batista WD
Carlier D
Suzuki CLB
Suzuki Jr ER
author_sort Parchen MAR
title Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients
title_short Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients
title_full Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients
title_fullStr Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients
title_sort dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5467
1177-5483
publishDate 2012-04-01
description Emilio Rintaro Suzuki Jr1, Cibele Lima Belico Suzuki1, Danielle Carlier1, Daniele Penha1, Marta dos Anjos Rodrigues Parchen1, Wagner Duarte Batista1, Joao Agostini Netto21Glaucoma Service, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilBackground: The purpose of this study was to determine any difference in dynamic contour tonometry and ocular pulse amplitude in asymmetric glaucoma patients with the same applanation intraocular pressure.Methods: This is a prospective, observational study of 30 glaucoma patients and 11 controls from June 2007 to February 2008. Most of the glaucoma patients were on prostaglandin analog treatment.Results: Mean applanation intraocular pressure in the control group was 14.28 mmHg for the right eye and 14.10 mmHg for the left eye (P > 0.05). Corneal thickness was 519.10 µm for the right eye and 511.07 µm for the left eye (P > 0.05). Mean dynamic contour tonometry intraocular pressure was 17.28 mmHg for the right eye and 17.25 mmHg for the left eye (P > 0.05). Mean ocular pulse amplitude was 2.80 mmHg for the right eye and 2.92 mmHg for the left eye (P > 0.05).Conclusion: No differences in ocular pulse amplitude were found between the two groups and between the worst and the best eye. In spite of there being no difference in ocular pulse amplitude, dynamic contour tonometry intraocular pressure was 2.44 mmHg higher in the worst eye than in the best eye in the glaucoma patients, even with the same applanation intraocular pressure. Further studies are needed to confirm if this difference is related to glaucoma progression or a worst prognosis and whether it can be considered to be a new risk factor.Keywords: dynamic contour tonometry, central cornea thickness, assymetric glaucoma
url http://www.dovepress.com/dynamic-contour-tonometry-in-asymmetric-glaucoma-patients-a9674
work_keys_str_mv AT parchenmar dynamiccontourtonometryinasymmetricglaucomapatients
AT penhad dynamiccontourtonometryinasymmetricglaucomapatients
AT agostininettoj dynamiccontourtonometryinasymmetricglaucomapatients
AT batistawd dynamiccontourtonometryinasymmetricglaucomapatients
AT carlierd dynamiccontourtonometryinasymmetricglaucomapatients
AT suzukiclb dynamiccontourtonometryinasymmetricglaucomapatients
AT suzukijrer dynamiccontourtonometryinasymmetricglaucomapatients
_version_ 1725171734515023872