Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients

Dynamic contour tonometry in asymmetric glaucoma patients

Emilio Rintaro Suzuki Jr1, Cibele Lima Belico Suzuki1, Danielle Carlier1, Daniele Penha1, Marta dos Anjos Rodrigues Parchen1, Wagner Duarte Batista1, Joao Agostini Netto21Glaucoma Service, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilBackground: The purpose of this study was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Parchen MAR, Penha D, Agostini Netto J, Batista WD, Carlier D, Suzuki CLB, Suzuki Jr ER
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Dove Medical Press 2012-04-01
Series:	Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:	http://www.dovepress.com/dynamic-contour-tonometry-in-asymmetric-glaucoma-patients-a9674

Similar Items

Study of dynamic contour tonometry in normal tension glaucoma patients and primary open angle glaucoma
by: Jun-Yi Xie, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)

Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus
by: Fatih Özcura, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus
by: Maddalena De Bernardo, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes
by: Fatih Özcura, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01)

Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
by: Herr A, et al.
Published: (2013-05-01)

Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry following Trabeculectomy
by: Efstathios T. Detorakis, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

Corrigendum: Efficacy and safety of travoprost alone or in combination with other agents for glaucoma and ocular hypertension: patient considerations
by: Suzuki CLB, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01)

Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL in edematous corneas
by: George A. Kontadakis, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Reply to comment by De Bernardo and Rosa on “Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus”
by: Fatih Özcura, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry
by: Grus Franz-H, et al.
Published: (2004-03-01)

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
by: Andreanos K, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens
by: Andrew K.C. Lam, et al.
Published: (2014-04-01)

Evaluation of Parameters Affecting Measurement Quality of Dynamic Contour Tonometry
by: Vuslat Gürlü, et al.
Published: (2011-09-01)

Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
by: Shemesh G, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01)

Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness
by: Federico Saenz-Frances, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01)

Dynamic contour tonometry and goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus Tonometria de contorno dinâmico e tonometria de aplanação de goldman em olhos com ceratocone
by: Jackson Barreto Jr, et al.
Published: (2006-01-01)

The impact of central corneal thickness on values of intraocular pressure measured using two methods: Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in patients with open-angle glaucoma
by: Jordanova Elena, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Using CorvisST tonometry to assess glaucoma progression.
by: Masato Matsuura, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Can dynamic contour tonometry and ocular pulse amplitude help to detect severe cardiovascular pathologies?
by: Bertelmann T, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01)

Advantages of dynamic bi-directional applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma diagnostics
by: A. Sh. Zagidullina, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST
by: Sushma Tejwani, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Erratum: A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST
Published: (2017-01-01)

The Effect of Corneal Thickness, Densitometry and Curvature on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Applanation, Rebound and Dynamic Contour Tonometry
by: Marco Antonio de Castro Olyntho Junior, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Adopting oculopressure tonometry as a transient in vivo rabbit glaucoma model
by: Stahnke T., et al.
Published: (2015-09-01)

Comparison of rebound tonometry and non-contact airpuff tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry
by: Goktug Demirci, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Correlations between different tonometries and ocular biometric parameters in patients with primary congenital glaucoma
by: Marcio Henrique Mendes, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)

Estudo comparativo entre o tonômetro de aplanação de Goldmann e o tonômetro de contorno dinâmico de Pascal no glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto e olhos normais Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes: a comparative study
by: Sergio Henrique Sampaio Meirelles, et al.
Published: (2008-12-01)

Mathematical modelling of tonometry
by: Gonzalez Castro, Gabriela, et al.
Published: (2011)

Comparison of two methods of tonometry in glaucoma patients: Goldmann applanation tonometer and non-contact tonometer
by: Hong-Feng Li, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements in Eyes with Glaucoma.
by: Masato Matsuura, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Jämförelse mellan rebound tonometri och non-contact tonometri
by: Bergdahl, Emilia
Published: (2013)

Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements
by: Bruno Leonardo Barranco Esporcatte, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

Comparison of ICare and IOPen vs Goldmann applanation tonometry according to international standards 8612 in glaucoma patients
by: Milena Pahlitzsch, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

An exploration of through-the-eyelid tonometry
by: Vandivier, Suzette D. (Suzette Denise), 1978-
Published: (2014)

Comparison of Rebound Tonometry, Perkins Applanation Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyser in Mucopolysaccharidosis Patients.
by: Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Utility of Goldmann applanation tonometry for monitoring intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients with a history of laser refractive surgery.
by: Sang Yeop Lee, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Differential tonometry in myopia
by: Reddy H, et al.
Published: (1983-01-01)

Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results
by: Aydın Yildiz, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

Rebound tonometry compared with goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with corneal pathology - a reliability study
by: Lamprecht, Johann Streicher
Published: (2017)

Comparison of Icare Pro Tonometry and Icare One Tonometry Measurements in Healthy Eyes
by: Hüseyin Mayalı, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)