Classifying Coding DNA with Nucleotide Statistics

In this report, we compared the success rate of classification of coding sequences (CDS) vs. introns by Codon Structure Factor (CSF) and by a method that we called Universal Feature Method (UFM). UFM is based on the scoring of purine bias (Rrr) and stop codon frequency. We show that the success rate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicolas Carels, Diego Frías
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2009-10-01
Series:Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
Online Access:http://la-press.com/classifying-coding-dna-with-nucleotide-statistics-a1718
id doaj-3178be3458be450dafdad47de8c7cdd4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3178be3458be450dafdad47de8c7cdd42020-11-25T03:32:20ZengSAGE PublishingBioinformatics and Biology Insights1177-93222009-10-0120093141154Classifying Coding DNA with Nucleotide StatisticsNicolas CarelsDiego FríasIn this report, we compared the success rate of classification of coding sequences (CDS) vs. introns by Codon Structure Factor (CSF) and by a method that we called Universal Feature Method (UFM). UFM is based on the scoring of purine bias (Rrr) and stop codon frequency. We show that the success rate of CDS/intron classification by UFM is higher than by CSF. UFM classifies ORFs as coding or non-coding through a score based on (i) the stop codon distribution, (ii) the product of purine probabilities in the three positions of nucleotide triplets, (iii) the product of Cytosine (C), Guanine (G), and Adenine (A) probabilities in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd positions of triplets, respectively, (iv) the probabilities of G in 1st and 2nd position of triplets and (v) the distance of their GC3 vs. GC2 levels to the regression line of the universal correlation. More than 80% of CDSs (true positives) of Homo sapiens (>250 bp), Drosophila melanogaster (>250 bp) and Arabidopsis thaliana (>200 bp) are successfully classified with a false positive rate lower or equal to 5%. The method releases coding sequences in their coding strand and coding frame, which allows their automatic translation into protein sequences with 95% confidence. The method is a natural consequence of the compositional bias of nucleotides in coding sequences. http://la-press.com/classifying-coding-dna-with-nucleotide-statistics-a1718
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicolas Carels
Diego Frías
spellingShingle Nicolas Carels
Diego Frías
Classifying Coding DNA with Nucleotide Statistics
Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
author_facet Nicolas Carels
Diego Frías
author_sort Nicolas Carels
title Classifying Coding DNA with Nucleotide Statistics
title_short Classifying Coding DNA with Nucleotide Statistics
title_full Classifying Coding DNA with Nucleotide Statistics
title_fullStr Classifying Coding DNA with Nucleotide Statistics
title_full_unstemmed Classifying Coding DNA with Nucleotide Statistics
title_sort classifying coding dna with nucleotide statistics
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
issn 1177-9322
publishDate 2009-10-01
description In this report, we compared the success rate of classification of coding sequences (CDS) vs. introns by Codon Structure Factor (CSF) and by a method that we called Universal Feature Method (UFM). UFM is based on the scoring of purine bias (Rrr) and stop codon frequency. We show that the success rate of CDS/intron classification by UFM is higher than by CSF. UFM classifies ORFs as coding or non-coding through a score based on (i) the stop codon distribution, (ii) the product of purine probabilities in the three positions of nucleotide triplets, (iii) the product of Cytosine (C), Guanine (G), and Adenine (A) probabilities in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd positions of triplets, respectively, (iv) the probabilities of G in 1st and 2nd position of triplets and (v) the distance of their GC3 vs. GC2 levels to the regression line of the universal correlation. More than 80% of CDSs (true positives) of Homo sapiens (>250 bp), Drosophila melanogaster (>250 bp) and Arabidopsis thaliana (>200 bp) are successfully classified with a false positive rate lower or equal to 5%. The method releases coding sequences in their coding strand and coding frame, which allows their automatic translation into protein sequences with 95% confidence. The method is a natural consequence of the compositional bias of nucleotides in coding sequences.
url http://la-press.com/classifying-coding-dna-with-nucleotide-statistics-a1718
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolascarels classifyingcodingdnawithnucleotidestatistics
AT diegofriacuteas classifyingcodingdnawithnucleotidestatistics
_version_ 1724569026693169152