Fine-tuning of the flowering time control in winter barley: the importance of HvOS2 and HvVRN2 in non-inductive conditions

Abstract Background In winter barley plants, vernalization and photoperiod cues have to be integrated to promote flowering. Plant development and expression of different flowering promoter (HvVRN1, HvCO2, PPD-H1, HvFT1, HvFT3) and repressor (HvVRN2, HvCO9 and HvOS2) genes were evaluated in two winte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arantxa Monteagudo, Ernesto Igartua, Bruno Contreras-Moreira, M. Pilar Gracia, Javier Ramos, Ildikó Karsai, Ana M. Casas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-03-01
Series:BMC Plant Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12870-019-1727-9
id doaj-317edf150e654cfd8bd79680d8965ccb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-317edf150e654cfd8bd79680d8965ccb2020-11-25T01:53:44ZengBMCBMC Plant Biology1471-22292019-03-0119111410.1186/s12870-019-1727-9Fine-tuning of the flowering time control in winter barley: the importance of HvOS2 and HvVRN2 in non-inductive conditionsArantxa Monteagudo0Ernesto Igartua1Bruno Contreras-Moreira2M. Pilar Gracia3Javier Ramos4Ildikó Karsai5Ana M. Casas6Aula Dei Experimental Station (EEAD-CSIC)Aula Dei Experimental Station (EEAD-CSIC)Aula Dei Experimental Station (EEAD-CSIC)Aula Dei Experimental Station (EEAD-CSIC)Aula Dei Experimental Station (EEAD-CSIC)Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of SciencesAula Dei Experimental Station (EEAD-CSIC)Abstract Background In winter barley plants, vernalization and photoperiod cues have to be integrated to promote flowering. Plant development and expression of different flowering promoter (HvVRN1, HvCO2, PPD-H1, HvFT1, HvFT3) and repressor (HvVRN2, HvCO9 and HvOS2) genes were evaluated in two winter barley varieties under: (1) natural increasing photoperiod, without vernalization, and (2) under short day conditions in three insufficient vernalization treatments. These challenging conditions were chosen to capture non-optimal and natural responses, representative of those experienced in the Mediterranean area. Results In absence of vernalization and under increasing photoperiods, HvVRN2 expression increased with day-length, mainly between 12 and 13 h photoperiods in our latitudes. The flowering promoter gene in short days, HvFT3, was only expressed after receiving induction of cold or plant age, which was associated with low transcript levels of HvVRN2 and HvOS2. Under the sub-optimal conditions here described, great differences in development were found between the two winter barley varieties used in the study. Delayed development in ‘Barberousse’ was associated with increased expression levels of HvOS2. Novel variation for HvCO9 and HvOS2 is reported and might explain such differences. Conclusions The balance between the expression of flowering promoters and repressor genes regulates the promotion towards flowering or the maintenance of the vegetative state. HvOS2, an ortholog of FLC, appears as a strong candidate to mediate in the vernalization response of barley. Natural variation found would help to exploit the plasticity in development to obtain better-adapted varieties for current and future climate conditions.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12870-019-1727-9BarleyGene expressionHvCO2HvFT3HvOS2HvVRN1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arantxa Monteagudo
Ernesto Igartua
Bruno Contreras-Moreira
M. Pilar Gracia
Javier Ramos
Ildikó Karsai
Ana M. Casas
spellingShingle Arantxa Monteagudo
Ernesto Igartua
Bruno Contreras-Moreira
M. Pilar Gracia
Javier Ramos
Ildikó Karsai
Ana M. Casas
Fine-tuning of the flowering time control in winter barley: the importance of HvOS2 and HvVRN2 in non-inductive conditions
BMC Plant Biology
Barley
Gene expression
HvCO2
HvFT3
HvOS2
HvVRN1
author_facet Arantxa Monteagudo
Ernesto Igartua
Bruno Contreras-Moreira
M. Pilar Gracia
Javier Ramos
Ildikó Karsai
Ana M. Casas
author_sort Arantxa Monteagudo
title Fine-tuning of the flowering time control in winter barley: the importance of HvOS2 and HvVRN2 in non-inductive conditions
title_short Fine-tuning of the flowering time control in winter barley: the importance of HvOS2 and HvVRN2 in non-inductive conditions
title_full Fine-tuning of the flowering time control in winter barley: the importance of HvOS2 and HvVRN2 in non-inductive conditions
title_fullStr Fine-tuning of the flowering time control in winter barley: the importance of HvOS2 and HvVRN2 in non-inductive conditions
title_full_unstemmed Fine-tuning of the flowering time control in winter barley: the importance of HvOS2 and HvVRN2 in non-inductive conditions
title_sort fine-tuning of the flowering time control in winter barley: the importance of hvos2 and hvvrn2 in non-inductive conditions
publisher BMC
series BMC Plant Biology
issn 1471-2229
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Abstract Background In winter barley plants, vernalization and photoperiod cues have to be integrated to promote flowering. Plant development and expression of different flowering promoter (HvVRN1, HvCO2, PPD-H1, HvFT1, HvFT3) and repressor (HvVRN2, HvCO9 and HvOS2) genes were evaluated in two winter barley varieties under: (1) natural increasing photoperiod, without vernalization, and (2) under short day conditions in three insufficient vernalization treatments. These challenging conditions were chosen to capture non-optimal and natural responses, representative of those experienced in the Mediterranean area. Results In absence of vernalization and under increasing photoperiods, HvVRN2 expression increased with day-length, mainly between 12 and 13 h photoperiods in our latitudes. The flowering promoter gene in short days, HvFT3, was only expressed after receiving induction of cold or plant age, which was associated with low transcript levels of HvVRN2 and HvOS2. Under the sub-optimal conditions here described, great differences in development were found between the two winter barley varieties used in the study. Delayed development in ‘Barberousse’ was associated with increased expression levels of HvOS2. Novel variation for HvCO9 and HvOS2 is reported and might explain such differences. Conclusions The balance between the expression of flowering promoters and repressor genes regulates the promotion towards flowering or the maintenance of the vegetative state. HvOS2, an ortholog of FLC, appears as a strong candidate to mediate in the vernalization response of barley. Natural variation found would help to exploit the plasticity in development to obtain better-adapted varieties for current and future climate conditions.
topic Barley
Gene expression
HvCO2
HvFT3
HvOS2
HvVRN1
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12870-019-1727-9
work_keys_str_mv AT arantxamonteagudo finetuningofthefloweringtimecontrolinwinterbarleytheimportanceofhvos2andhvvrn2innoninductiveconditions
AT ernestoigartua finetuningofthefloweringtimecontrolinwinterbarleytheimportanceofhvos2andhvvrn2innoninductiveconditions
AT brunocontrerasmoreira finetuningofthefloweringtimecontrolinwinterbarleytheimportanceofhvos2andhvvrn2innoninductiveconditions
AT mpilargracia finetuningofthefloweringtimecontrolinwinterbarleytheimportanceofhvos2andhvvrn2innoninductiveconditions
AT javierramos finetuningofthefloweringtimecontrolinwinterbarleytheimportanceofhvos2andhvvrn2innoninductiveconditions
AT ildikokarsai finetuningofthefloweringtimecontrolinwinterbarleytheimportanceofhvos2andhvvrn2innoninductiveconditions
AT anamcasas finetuningofthefloweringtimecontrolinwinterbarleytheimportanceofhvos2andhvvrn2innoninductiveconditions
_version_ 1724989369509478400