Positionnement descriptif, positionnement normatif, positionnement militant

This paper focuses on the issue of the researcher’s attitude to his object (in particular, on the possibility of adopting a critical stance). This question concerns the whole realm of social sciences; here, it is tackled in the light of the author’s experience in argumentation studies. She distingui...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marianne Doury
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: University of Tel-Aviv 2013-10-01
Series:Argumentation et Analyse du Discours
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/aad/1540
id doaj-31a947303add4df493ca2893de60e71b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31a947303add4df493ca2893de60e71b2020-11-24T22:00:51ZfraUniversity of Tel-AvivArgumentation et Analyse du Discours1565-89612013-10-011110.4000/aad.1540Positionnement descriptif, positionnement normatif, positionnement militantMarianne DouryThis paper focuses on the issue of the researcher’s attitude to his object (in particular, on the possibility of adopting a critical stance). This question concerns the whole realm of social sciences; here, it is tackled in the light of the author’s experience in argumentation studies. She distinguishes three perspectives (descriptive positioning, normative positioning, militant positioning) and compares two analyses she produced of some political discourse. These analyses obey different logics (an epistemic and a political one), and display contrasting discursive and enunciative characteristics. While admitting that caring for critical activism is legitimate, the author concludes to the necessity of acknowledging and maintaining the split between what falls under science and what falls under politics in argumentation studies.http://journals.openedition.org/aad/1540criticsdescriptive perspectivemilitant perspectivenormative perspectivepolitical discourse analysis
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marianne Doury
spellingShingle Marianne Doury
Positionnement descriptif, positionnement normatif, positionnement militant
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours
critics
descriptive perspective
militant perspective
normative perspective
political discourse analysis
author_facet Marianne Doury
author_sort Marianne Doury
title Positionnement descriptif, positionnement normatif, positionnement militant
title_short Positionnement descriptif, positionnement normatif, positionnement militant
title_full Positionnement descriptif, positionnement normatif, positionnement militant
title_fullStr Positionnement descriptif, positionnement normatif, positionnement militant
title_full_unstemmed Positionnement descriptif, positionnement normatif, positionnement militant
title_sort positionnement descriptif, positionnement normatif, positionnement militant
publisher University of Tel-Aviv
series Argumentation et Analyse du Discours
issn 1565-8961
publishDate 2013-10-01
description This paper focuses on the issue of the researcher’s attitude to his object (in particular, on the possibility of adopting a critical stance). This question concerns the whole realm of social sciences; here, it is tackled in the light of the author’s experience in argumentation studies. She distinguishes three perspectives (descriptive positioning, normative positioning, militant positioning) and compares two analyses she produced of some political discourse. These analyses obey different logics (an epistemic and a political one), and display contrasting discursive and enunciative characteristics. While admitting that caring for critical activism is legitimate, the author concludes to the necessity of acknowledging and maintaining the split between what falls under science and what falls under politics in argumentation studies.
topic critics
descriptive perspective
militant perspective
normative perspective
political discourse analysis
url http://journals.openedition.org/aad/1540
work_keys_str_mv AT mariannedoury positionnementdescriptifpositionnementnormatifpositionnementmilitant
_version_ 1725842466049884160