Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial

Abstract Background The chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD. Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pablo Altman, Luis Wehbe, Juergen Dederichs, Tadhg Guerin, Brian Ament, Miguel Cardenas Moronta, Andrea Valeria Pino, Pankaj Goyal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0
id doaj-31db7c79722c483f8894eba404db2616
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31db7c79722c483f8894eba404db26162020-11-24T22:11:22ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662018-06-011811810.1186/s12890-018-0662-0Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trialPablo Altman0Luis Wehbe1Juergen Dederichs2Tadhg Guerin3Brian Ament4Miguel Cardenas Moronta5Andrea Valeria Pino6Pankaj Goyal7Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationInstituto Ave Pulmo, Fundación EnfisemaNovartis Pharma AGNovartis Ireland LimitedNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationNovartis Pharma AGNovartis Argentina S.ANovartis Pharma AGAbstract Background The chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD. Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhalation effort required and flow rates achieved by patients. Here, we present the comparison of the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIF) values achieved by COPD patients, with moderate to very severe airflow limitation, through the Breezhaler®, the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. The effects of disease severity, age and gender on PIF rate were also evaluated. Methods This randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, Phase IV study recruited patients with moderate to very severe airflow limitation (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease 2014 strategy), aged ≥40 years and having a smoking history of ≥10 pack years. No active drug or placebo was administered during the study. The inhalation profiles were recorded using inhalers fitted with a pressure tap and transducer at the wall of the mouthpiece. For each patient, the inhalation with the highest PIF value, out of three replicate inhalations per device, was selected for analysis. A paired t-test was performed to compare mean PIFs between each combination of devices. Results In total, 97 COPD patients were enrolled and completed the study. The highest mean PIF value (L/min ± SE) was observed with the Breezhaler® (108 ± 23), followed by the Ellipta® (78 ± 15) and the HandiHaler® (49 ± 9) inhalers and the lowest mean pressure drop values were recorded with the Breezhaler® inhaler, followed by the Ellipta® inhaler and the HandiHaler® inhaler, in the overall patient population. A similar trend was consistently observed in patients across all subgroups of COPD severity, within all age groups and for both genders. Conclusions Patients with COPD were able to inhale with the least inspiratory effort and generate the highest mean PIF value through the Breezhaler® inhaler when compared with the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. These results were similar irrespective of patients’ COPD severity, age or gender. Trial registration The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596009 on 4 November 2015. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0Peak inspiratory flowInspiratory effortDry powder inhalersPressure dropBreezhaler®
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pablo Altman
Luis Wehbe
Juergen Dederichs
Tadhg Guerin
Brian Ament
Miguel Cardenas Moronta
Andrea Valeria Pino
Pankaj Goyal
spellingShingle Pablo Altman
Luis Wehbe
Juergen Dederichs
Tadhg Guerin
Brian Ament
Miguel Cardenas Moronta
Andrea Valeria Pino
Pankaj Goyal
Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Peak inspiratory flow
Inspiratory effort
Dry powder inhalers
Pressure drop
Breezhaler®
author_facet Pablo Altman
Luis Wehbe
Juergen Dederichs
Tadhg Guerin
Brian Ament
Miguel Cardenas Moronta
Andrea Valeria Pino
Pankaj Goyal
author_sort Pablo Altman
title Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial
title_short Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial
title_full Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial
title_fullStr Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the Breezhaler®, Ellipta® and HandiHaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: a randomized cross-over trial
title_sort comparison of peak inspiratory flow rate via the breezhaler®, ellipta® and handihaler® dry powder inhalers in patients with moderate to very severe copd: a randomized cross-over trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
issn 1471-2466
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Abstract Background The chronic and progressive nature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires self-administration of inhaled medication. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for inhalation therapy in COPD. Important considerations when selecting DPIs include inhalation effort required and flow rates achieved by patients. Here, we present the comparison of the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIF) values achieved by COPD patients, with moderate to very severe airflow limitation, through the Breezhaler®, the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. The effects of disease severity, age and gender on PIF rate were also evaluated. Methods This randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, Phase IV study recruited patients with moderate to very severe airflow limitation (Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease 2014 strategy), aged ≥40 years and having a smoking history of ≥10 pack years. No active drug or placebo was administered during the study. The inhalation profiles were recorded using inhalers fitted with a pressure tap and transducer at the wall of the mouthpiece. For each patient, the inhalation with the highest PIF value, out of three replicate inhalations per device, was selected for analysis. A paired t-test was performed to compare mean PIFs between each combination of devices. Results In total, 97 COPD patients were enrolled and completed the study. The highest mean PIF value (L/min ± SE) was observed with the Breezhaler® (108 ± 23), followed by the Ellipta® (78 ± 15) and the HandiHaler® (49 ± 9) inhalers and the lowest mean pressure drop values were recorded with the Breezhaler® inhaler, followed by the Ellipta® inhaler and the HandiHaler® inhaler, in the overall patient population. A similar trend was consistently observed in patients across all subgroups of COPD severity, within all age groups and for both genders. Conclusions Patients with COPD were able to inhale with the least inspiratory effort and generate the highest mean PIF value through the Breezhaler® inhaler when compared with the Ellipta® and the HandiHaler® inhalers. These results were similar irrespective of patients’ COPD severity, age or gender. Trial registration The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596009 on 4 November 2015. 
topic Peak inspiratory flow
Inspiratory effort
Dry powder inhalers
Pressure drop
Breezhaler®
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-018-0662-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pabloaltman comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT luiswehbe comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT juergendederichs comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT tadhgguerin comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT brianament comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT miguelcardenasmoronta comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT andreavaleriapino comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT pankajgoyal comparisonofpeakinspiratoryflowrateviathebreezhalerelliptaandhandihalerdrypowderinhalersinpatientswithmoderatetoveryseverecopdarandomizedcrossovertrial
_version_ 1725805972083965952