Rough Beer Filterability in Industrial Powder-filters and Lab-scale Dead-end and Crossflow Filtration Apparatuses

Rough beer clarification in large-sized breweries is mainly carried out using powder filters. In this work, it was attempted to explain why two rough beer samples yielded quite different filtrate volumes (~965 vs. 2,068 hL) from industrial-scale powder filters coated with equal doses of filter-aids...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessio Cimini, Giacomo Bedini, Mauro Moresi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2021-07-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11726
id doaj-31e0ffb5d18e452ca110bf7e76c4c92c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31e0ffb5d18e452ca110bf7e76c4c92c2021-07-01T20:25:09ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162021-07-018710.3303/CET2187042Rough Beer Filterability in Industrial Powder-filters and Lab-scale Dead-end and Crossflow Filtration ApparatusesAlessio CiminiGiacomo BediniMauro MoresiRough beer clarification in large-sized breweries is mainly carried out using powder filters. In this work, it was attempted to explain why two rough beer samples yielded quite different filtrate volumes (~965 vs. 2,068 hL) from industrial-scale powder filters coated with equal doses of filter-aids of the same nominal permeability, but of different lots. By resorting to a bench-top dead-end filtration apparatus, the above 50% reduction in beer filterability was attributed to the lots used, the permeability of the corresponding filter cakes slightly varying from ~0.19 to 0.25 Darcy. When using a bench-top plant equipped with a 0.8-µm ceramic tubular membrane operating under constant values of the transmembrane pressure difference (3.73 bar), feed superficial velocity (6 m.s-1), and temperature (1.5 °C), the volumes of permeate recovered, as well as the limiting and average permeation fluxes, were not statistically different. Thus, membrane clarification of rough beer may overcome the intrinsic variation in the particle size distribution of commercially available filter-aids of the same nominal permeability.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11726
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alessio Cimini
Giacomo Bedini
Mauro Moresi
spellingShingle Alessio Cimini
Giacomo Bedini
Mauro Moresi
Rough Beer Filterability in Industrial Powder-filters and Lab-scale Dead-end and Crossflow Filtration Apparatuses
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet Alessio Cimini
Giacomo Bedini
Mauro Moresi
author_sort Alessio Cimini
title Rough Beer Filterability in Industrial Powder-filters and Lab-scale Dead-end and Crossflow Filtration Apparatuses
title_short Rough Beer Filterability in Industrial Powder-filters and Lab-scale Dead-end and Crossflow Filtration Apparatuses
title_full Rough Beer Filterability in Industrial Powder-filters and Lab-scale Dead-end and Crossflow Filtration Apparatuses
title_fullStr Rough Beer Filterability in Industrial Powder-filters and Lab-scale Dead-end and Crossflow Filtration Apparatuses
title_full_unstemmed Rough Beer Filterability in Industrial Powder-filters and Lab-scale Dead-end and Crossflow Filtration Apparatuses
title_sort rough beer filterability in industrial powder-filters and lab-scale dead-end and crossflow filtration apparatuses
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Rough beer clarification in large-sized breweries is mainly carried out using powder filters. In this work, it was attempted to explain why two rough beer samples yielded quite different filtrate volumes (~965 vs. 2,068 hL) from industrial-scale powder filters coated with equal doses of filter-aids of the same nominal permeability, but of different lots. By resorting to a bench-top dead-end filtration apparatus, the above 50% reduction in beer filterability was attributed to the lots used, the permeability of the corresponding filter cakes slightly varying from ~0.19 to 0.25 Darcy. When using a bench-top plant equipped with a 0.8-µm ceramic tubular membrane operating under constant values of the transmembrane pressure difference (3.73 bar), feed superficial velocity (6 m.s-1), and temperature (1.5 °C), the volumes of permeate recovered, as well as the limiting and average permeation fluxes, were not statistically different. Thus, membrane clarification of rough beer may overcome the intrinsic variation in the particle size distribution of commercially available filter-aids of the same nominal permeability.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11726
work_keys_str_mv AT alessiocimini roughbeerfilterabilityinindustrialpowderfiltersandlabscaledeadendandcrossflowfiltrationapparatuses
AT giacomobedini roughbeerfilterabilityinindustrialpowderfiltersandlabscaledeadendandcrossflowfiltrationapparatuses
AT mauromoresi roughbeerfilterabilityinindustrialpowderfiltersandlabscaledeadendandcrossflowfiltrationapparatuses
_version_ 1721345853306699776