Management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in French EDs

Abstract Background Decisions of withholding or withdrawing life sustaining-treatments in emergency department are part of current practice but the decision-making process remains poorly described in the literature. Study objective We conducted a study in two phases, the first comprising a retrospec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marion Douplat, Laurie Fraticelli, Clement Claustre, Alexandra Peiretti, Patrice Serre, Magali Bischoff, Laurent Jacquin, Julie Freyssenge, Anne-Marie Schott, Karim Tazarourte, Soizic Frugier, Carlos E. L. Khoury, The LAT group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13049-020-00744-7
id doaj-32138f3ff70e46068c18b39e5d1c45f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32138f3ff70e46068c18b39e5d1c45f72020-11-25T03:25:54ZengBMCScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine1757-72412020-06-0128111010.1186/s13049-020-00744-7Management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in French EDsMarion Douplat0Laurie Fraticelli1Clement Claustre2Alexandra Peiretti3Patrice Serre4Magali Bischoff5Laurent Jacquin6Julie Freyssenge7Anne-Marie Schott8Karim Tazarourte9Soizic Frugier10Carlos E. L. Khoury11The LAT groupHospices Civils of Lyon, Emergency department, Lyon Sud HospitalRESCUe-RESUVal Network, Lucien Hussel HospitalRESCUe-RESUVal Network, Lucien Hussel HospitalRESCUe-RESUVal Network, Lucien Hussel HospitalRESCUe-RESUVal Network, Lucien Hussel HospitalRESCUe-RESUVal Network, Lucien Hussel HospitalHospices Civils of Lyon, Emergency department, Edouard Herriot HospitalRESCUe-RESUVal Network, Lucien Hussel HospitalUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425Hospices Civils of Lyon, Emergency department, Edouard Herriot HospitalHospices Civils of Lyon, Emergency department, Lyon Sud HospitalRESCUe-RESUVal Network, Lucien Hussel HospitalAbstract Background Decisions of withholding or withdrawing life sustaining-treatments in emergency department are part of current practice but the decision-making process remains poorly described in the literature. Study objective We conducted a study in two phases, the first comprising a retrospective chart review study of patients dying in the ED and the second comprising survey study of health care workers at 10 urban emergency departments in France. Method In a first step, we analyzed medical records based on fifteen criteria of the decision-making process grouped into four categories: the collegiality, the traceability, the management and the communication as recommended by the international guidelines. In a second step, we conducted an auto-administrated survey to assess how the staff members (medical, paramedical) feel with the decision-making process. Results There were 273 deaths which occurred in the ED over the study period and we included 145 (53.1%) patients. The first-step analysis revealed that the traceability of the decision and the information given to patient or the relatives were the most reported points according to the recommendations. Three of the ten emergency departments had developed a written procedure. The collegial discussion and the traceability of the prognosis assessment were significantly increased in emergency department with a written procedure as well as management of pain, comfort care, and the communication with the patient or the relatives. In the second-step analysis, among the 735 staff members asked to take part in the survey, 287 (39.0%) answered. The medical and paramedical staff expressed difficult experience regarding the announcement and the communication with the patient and the relatives. Conclusion The management of the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments must be improved in emergency departments according to the guidelines. A standard written procedure could be useful in clinical practice despite the lack of experienced difference between centers with and without procedures.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13049-020-00744-7Decision making; emergency servicePalliative careHealth personnel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marion Douplat
Laurie Fraticelli
Clement Claustre
Alexandra Peiretti
Patrice Serre
Magali Bischoff
Laurent Jacquin
Julie Freyssenge
Anne-Marie Schott
Karim Tazarourte
Soizic Frugier
Carlos E. L. Khoury
The LAT group
spellingShingle Marion Douplat
Laurie Fraticelli
Clement Claustre
Alexandra Peiretti
Patrice Serre
Magali Bischoff
Laurent Jacquin
Julie Freyssenge
Anne-Marie Schott
Karim Tazarourte
Soizic Frugier
Carlos E. L. Khoury
The LAT group
Management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in French EDs
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Decision making; emergency service
Palliative care
Health personnel
author_facet Marion Douplat
Laurie Fraticelli
Clement Claustre
Alexandra Peiretti
Patrice Serre
Magali Bischoff
Laurent Jacquin
Julie Freyssenge
Anne-Marie Schott
Karim Tazarourte
Soizic Frugier
Carlos E. L. Khoury
The LAT group
author_sort Marion Douplat
title Management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in French EDs
title_short Management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in French EDs
title_full Management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in French EDs
title_fullStr Management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in French EDs
title_full_unstemmed Management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in French EDs
title_sort management of decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in french eds
publisher BMC
series Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
issn 1757-7241
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Background Decisions of withholding or withdrawing life sustaining-treatments in emergency department are part of current practice but the decision-making process remains poorly described in the literature. Study objective We conducted a study in two phases, the first comprising a retrospective chart review study of patients dying in the ED and the second comprising survey study of health care workers at 10 urban emergency departments in France. Method In a first step, we analyzed medical records based on fifteen criteria of the decision-making process grouped into four categories: the collegiality, the traceability, the management and the communication as recommended by the international guidelines. In a second step, we conducted an auto-administrated survey to assess how the staff members (medical, paramedical) feel with the decision-making process. Results There were 273 deaths which occurred in the ED over the study period and we included 145 (53.1%) patients. The first-step analysis revealed that the traceability of the decision and the information given to patient or the relatives were the most reported points according to the recommendations. Three of the ten emergency departments had developed a written procedure. The collegial discussion and the traceability of the prognosis assessment were significantly increased in emergency department with a written procedure as well as management of pain, comfort care, and the communication with the patient or the relatives. In the second-step analysis, among the 735 staff members asked to take part in the survey, 287 (39.0%) answered. The medical and paramedical staff expressed difficult experience regarding the announcement and the communication with the patient and the relatives. Conclusion The management of the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments must be improved in emergency departments according to the guidelines. A standard written procedure could be useful in clinical practice despite the lack of experienced difference between centers with and without procedures.
topic Decision making; emergency service
Palliative care
Health personnel
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13049-020-00744-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mariondouplat managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT lauriefraticelli managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT clementclaustre managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT alexandrapeiretti managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT patriceserre managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT magalibischoff managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT laurentjacquin managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT juliefreyssenge managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT annemarieschott managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT karimtazarourte managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT soizicfrugier managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT carloselkhoury managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
AT thelatgroup managementofdecisionofwithholdingandwithdrawinglifesustainingtreatmentsinfrencheds
_version_ 1724594961233477632