Training engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: A cross-diagnostic study

Computerized cognitive training (CCT) interventions are increasing in their use in outpatient mental health settings. These interventions have demonstrated efficacy for improving functional outcomes when combined with rehabilitation interventions. It has recently been suggested that patients with mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philip D. Harvey, Alexandra M. Balzer, Raymond J. Kotwicki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-03-01
Series:Schizophrenia Research: Cognition
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001319300046
id doaj-32531287982346fe91a981f8e80d3bb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32531287982346fe91a981f8e80d3bb72020-11-25T03:34:57ZengElsevierSchizophrenia Research: Cognition2215-00132020-03-0119Training engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: A cross-diagnostic studyPhilip D. Harvey0Alexandra M. Balzer1Raymond J. Kotwicki2University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, USA; Corresponding author at: University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, Suite 1450, Miami, FL 33136, USA.Skyland Trail, USASkyland Trail, USAComputerized cognitive training (CCT) interventions are increasing in their use in outpatient mental health settings. These interventions have demonstrated efficacy for improving functional outcomes when combined with rehabilitation interventions. It has recently been suggested that patients with more cognitive impairment have a greater therapeutic response and that reduced engagement in training can identify cases who manifest low levels of benefit from treatment. Participants were psychiatric rehabilitation clients, with diagnoses of major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Newly admitted cases received CCT, delivered via Brain HQ, with cognitive functioning divided into groups on the basis of a BACS t-score of 40 or less vs. more. Training engagement was indexed by the number of training levels achieved per day trained. Forty-nine cases trained on average for 17 days and completed a mean of 150 levels. Overall, patients improved by an average of 4.4 points (0.44 SD) in BACS t-scores (p < .001). Improvements were positively correlated with training engagement (r = 0.30, p < .05), but not with days trained (r = 0.09) or levels earned (r = 0.03) alone. Patients with higher levels of baseline cognitive performance had reduced cognitive gains (p < .003), but did not have less training engagement (p = .97). Diagnoses did not predict cognitive gains (p = .93) or target engagement (p = .74). Poorer performance at baseline and higher levels of training engagement accounted for >10% in independent variance in cognitive gains. The mean level of cognitive improvement far exceeded practice effects. The index of engagement, levels achieved per training day, is easily extracted from the training records of patients, which would allow for early and continuous monitoring of treatment engagement in CCT activities and therapist intervention as needed to improve engagement.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001319300046
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Philip D. Harvey
Alexandra M. Balzer
Raymond J. Kotwicki
spellingShingle Philip D. Harvey
Alexandra M. Balzer
Raymond J. Kotwicki
Training engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: A cross-diagnostic study
Schizophrenia Research: Cognition
author_facet Philip D. Harvey
Alexandra M. Balzer
Raymond J. Kotwicki
author_sort Philip D. Harvey
title Training engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: A cross-diagnostic study
title_short Training engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: A cross-diagnostic study
title_full Training engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: A cross-diagnostic study
title_fullStr Training engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: A cross-diagnostic study
title_full_unstemmed Training engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: A cross-diagnostic study
title_sort training engagement, baseline cognitive functioning, and cognitive gains with computerized cognitive training: a cross-diagnostic study
publisher Elsevier
series Schizophrenia Research: Cognition
issn 2215-0013
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Computerized cognitive training (CCT) interventions are increasing in their use in outpatient mental health settings. These interventions have demonstrated efficacy for improving functional outcomes when combined with rehabilitation interventions. It has recently been suggested that patients with more cognitive impairment have a greater therapeutic response and that reduced engagement in training can identify cases who manifest low levels of benefit from treatment. Participants were psychiatric rehabilitation clients, with diagnoses of major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Newly admitted cases received CCT, delivered via Brain HQ, with cognitive functioning divided into groups on the basis of a BACS t-score of 40 or less vs. more. Training engagement was indexed by the number of training levels achieved per day trained. Forty-nine cases trained on average for 17 days and completed a mean of 150 levels. Overall, patients improved by an average of 4.4 points (0.44 SD) in BACS t-scores (p < .001). Improvements were positively correlated with training engagement (r = 0.30, p < .05), but not with days trained (r = 0.09) or levels earned (r = 0.03) alone. Patients with higher levels of baseline cognitive performance had reduced cognitive gains (p < .003), but did not have less training engagement (p = .97). Diagnoses did not predict cognitive gains (p = .93) or target engagement (p = .74). Poorer performance at baseline and higher levels of training engagement accounted for >10% in independent variance in cognitive gains. The mean level of cognitive improvement far exceeded practice effects. The index of engagement, levels achieved per training day, is easily extracted from the training records of patients, which would allow for early and continuous monitoring of treatment engagement in CCT activities and therapist intervention as needed to improve engagement.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001319300046
work_keys_str_mv AT philipdharvey trainingengagementbaselinecognitivefunctioningandcognitivegainswithcomputerizedcognitivetrainingacrossdiagnosticstudy
AT alexandrambalzer trainingengagementbaselinecognitivefunctioningandcognitivegainswithcomputerizedcognitivetrainingacrossdiagnosticstudy
AT raymondjkotwicki trainingengagementbaselinecognitivefunctioningandcognitivegainswithcomputerizedcognitivetrainingacrossdiagnosticstudy
_version_ 1724556403085934592