Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication

ABSTRACT Objective: to validate the neurofunctional evaluation for Alternative and Augmented Communication protocol. Methods: the study was carried out in four steps: instrument construction, literature review, clinical validation and evaluation of the protocol by field experts, through an interac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ítala da Piedade Queiroz, Edênia da Cunha Menezes, Ivana Maria Barboza dos Santos, Ueslane Melo de Goes, Rosana Carla do Nascimento Givigi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CEFAC Saúde e Educação
Series:Revista CEFAC
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000300291&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-32b4fc5996be48ee98ca0e0f4668ff06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32b4fc5996be48ee98ca0e0f4668ff062020-11-24T20:47:12ZengCEFAC Saúde e EducaçãoRevista CEFAC1982-021620329130310.1590/1982-0216201820318017S1516-18462018000300291Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative CommunicationÍtala da Piedade QueirozEdênia da Cunha MenezesIvana Maria Barboza dos SantosUeslane Melo de GoesRosana Carla do Nascimento GivigiABSTRACT Objective: to validate the neurofunctional evaluation for Alternative and Augmented Communication protocol. Methods: the study was carried out in four steps: instrument construction, literature review, clinical validation and evaluation of the protocol by field experts, through an interactive questionnaire which was repeatedly applied, until the last set of responses was regarded as satisfactory. In addition, clinical evaluations were performed by applying the protocol in children and adolescents with motor impairment in a clinical trial. Results: statistical analysis of the protocol application in the therapeutic setting showed the Kappa indices for each observer with an overall mean of 0.436 (moderate agreement), besides the agreement among experts in content evaluation. Conclusion: agreement between the evaluators, specialists and the protocol clinical application results allowed choosing and implementing an alternative communication resource appropriate to the neuromuscular characteristics of the patient, providing a low cost access, as well as the quick identification of the motor skills that enabled the speech-language therapy.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000300291&lng=en&tlng=enComunicaçãoPessoas com DeficiênciaEstudos de Validação
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ítala da Piedade Queiroz
Edênia da Cunha Menezes
Ivana Maria Barboza dos Santos
Ueslane Melo de Goes
Rosana Carla do Nascimento Givigi
spellingShingle Ítala da Piedade Queiroz
Edênia da Cunha Menezes
Ivana Maria Barboza dos Santos
Ueslane Melo de Goes
Rosana Carla do Nascimento Givigi
Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication
Revista CEFAC
Comunicação
Pessoas com Deficiência
Estudos de Validação
author_facet Ítala da Piedade Queiroz
Edênia da Cunha Menezes
Ivana Maria Barboza dos Santos
Ueslane Melo de Goes
Rosana Carla do Nascimento Givigi
author_sort Ítala da Piedade Queiroz
title Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication
title_short Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication
title_full Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication
title_fullStr Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for Alternative and Augmentative Communication
title_sort validation of the neurofunctional evaluation protocol for alternative and augmentative communication
publisher CEFAC Saúde e Educação
series Revista CEFAC
issn 1982-0216
description ABSTRACT Objective: to validate the neurofunctional evaluation for Alternative and Augmented Communication protocol. Methods: the study was carried out in four steps: instrument construction, literature review, clinical validation and evaluation of the protocol by field experts, through an interactive questionnaire which was repeatedly applied, until the last set of responses was regarded as satisfactory. In addition, clinical evaluations were performed by applying the protocol in children and adolescents with motor impairment in a clinical trial. Results: statistical analysis of the protocol application in the therapeutic setting showed the Kappa indices for each observer with an overall mean of 0.436 (moderate agreement), besides the agreement among experts in content evaluation. Conclusion: agreement between the evaluators, specialists and the protocol clinical application results allowed choosing and implementing an alternative communication resource appropriate to the neuromuscular characteristics of the patient, providing a low cost access, as well as the quick identification of the motor skills that enabled the speech-language therapy.
topic Comunicação
Pessoas com Deficiência
Estudos de Validação
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462018000300291&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT italadapiedadequeiroz validationoftheneurofunctionalevaluationprotocolforalternativeandaugmentativecommunication
AT edeniadacunhamenezes validationoftheneurofunctionalevaluationprotocolforalternativeandaugmentativecommunication
AT ivanamariabarbozadossantos validationoftheneurofunctionalevaluationprotocolforalternativeandaugmentativecommunication
AT ueslanemelodegoes validationoftheneurofunctionalevaluationprotocolforalternativeandaugmentativecommunication
AT rosanacarladonascimentogivigi validationoftheneurofunctionalevaluationprotocolforalternativeandaugmentativecommunication
_version_ 1716810778127892480