Miserere. Aesthetics of Terror

I say: “Oh, what a beautiful surrealist picture!” With quite precise awareness: this páthos, these emotions of mine do not stem from our common sense. An aesthetic judgment is founded on an immediate subjective intuition: an emotion or a free feeling of a single subject towards an object. A universa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antonio Incampo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Philosophical Research 2011-10-01
Series:Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
Subjects:
law
Online Access:http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/A-Incampo-Miserere-Aesthetics.pdf
id doaj-32cd15013028427c8d9159fe9e697fea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32cd15013028427c8d9159fe9e697fea2020-11-25T00:04:39ZengCentre for Philosophical ResearchAvant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard2082-75982082-67102011-10-0122/2011111118Miserere. Aesthetics of TerrorAntonio IncampoI say: “Oh, what a beautiful surrealist picture!” With quite precise awareness: this páthos, these emotions of mine do not stem from our common sense. An aesthetic judgment is founded on an immediate subjective intuition: an emotion or a free feeling of a single subject towards an object. A universal sense, possibly. Some judgments of ours in ethics and in law are no different from our perceptions in front of art. It would be the same for a hypothetical sentence of the judge that concluded with these words: “I acquit Arsenio Lupin because of his magnificent handlebar moustache like that of Guy de Maupassant”. Everyone would think intuitively that it is an unfair sentence. Is there aesthetics of terror? The case that the article intends to examine is that of the famous kidnapping and murder of the Italian statesman Aldo Moro by the “Brigate Rosse” [Red Brigades] (1978). The method used here consists in studying the image of the kidnapping as iconic documentation of reality, and, above all, as an ethical-legal judgment about the terrorist crime. Moro was photographed during his kidnapping. There are at least two pictures. Both constitute an extraordinary source for a judgment on the basis of an image. In both of them, Aldo Moro is pictured in front of a Red Brigades banner during the captivity. In what sense do these pictures document an aesthetic judgment concerning the “case Moro”? The answer can be found in a remarkable iconic coincidence of these pictures with a masterpiece by Georges Rouault (Paris 1871-1958) devoted to the theme of the “Ecce Homo”. The Gospel in the “Ecce Homo” scene (John: 19, 4-5) narrates how Pontius Pilate wanted to arouse the compassion of the people with a scourging and the exposure of Jesus to the crowd. The plate under consideration is entitled “Qui ne se grime pas?” [Who does not have a painted face?] and is a key work in Rouault’s suite of prints Miserere, dated for 1923.http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/A-Incampo-Miserere-Aesthetics.pdfaestheticlawMisererepathosterrorMoro AldoRouault Georges
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonio Incampo
spellingShingle Antonio Incampo
Miserere. Aesthetics of Terror
Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
aesthetic
law
Miserere
pathos
terror
Moro Aldo
Rouault Georges
author_facet Antonio Incampo
author_sort Antonio Incampo
title Miserere. Aesthetics of Terror
title_short Miserere. Aesthetics of Terror
title_full Miserere. Aesthetics of Terror
title_fullStr Miserere. Aesthetics of Terror
title_full_unstemmed Miserere. Aesthetics of Terror
title_sort miserere. aesthetics of terror
publisher Centre for Philosophical Research
series Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
issn 2082-7598
2082-6710
publishDate 2011-10-01
description I say: “Oh, what a beautiful surrealist picture!” With quite precise awareness: this páthos, these emotions of mine do not stem from our common sense. An aesthetic judgment is founded on an immediate subjective intuition: an emotion or a free feeling of a single subject towards an object. A universal sense, possibly. Some judgments of ours in ethics and in law are no different from our perceptions in front of art. It would be the same for a hypothetical sentence of the judge that concluded with these words: “I acquit Arsenio Lupin because of his magnificent handlebar moustache like that of Guy de Maupassant”. Everyone would think intuitively that it is an unfair sentence. Is there aesthetics of terror? The case that the article intends to examine is that of the famous kidnapping and murder of the Italian statesman Aldo Moro by the “Brigate Rosse” [Red Brigades] (1978). The method used here consists in studying the image of the kidnapping as iconic documentation of reality, and, above all, as an ethical-legal judgment about the terrorist crime. Moro was photographed during his kidnapping. There are at least two pictures. Both constitute an extraordinary source for a judgment on the basis of an image. In both of them, Aldo Moro is pictured in front of a Red Brigades banner during the captivity. In what sense do these pictures document an aesthetic judgment concerning the “case Moro”? The answer can be found in a remarkable iconic coincidence of these pictures with a masterpiece by Georges Rouault (Paris 1871-1958) devoted to the theme of the “Ecce Homo”. The Gospel in the “Ecce Homo” scene (John: 19, 4-5) narrates how Pontius Pilate wanted to arouse the compassion of the people with a scourging and the exposure of Jesus to the crowd. The plate under consideration is entitled “Qui ne se grime pas?” [Who does not have a painted face?] and is a key work in Rouault’s suite of prints Miserere, dated for 1923.
topic aesthetic
law
Miserere
pathos
terror
Moro Aldo
Rouault Georges
url http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/A-Incampo-Miserere-Aesthetics.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT antonioincampo miserereaestheticsofterror
_version_ 1725428807335149568