An assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomes
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Epitope prediction using computational methods represents one of the most promising approaches to vaccine development. Reduction of time, cost, and the availability of completely sequenced genomes are key points and highly motivating...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Bioinformatics |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/309 |
id |
doaj-32d3d8dd47ba4b16a4cb92893dd72042 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-32d3d8dd47ba4b16a4cb92893dd720422020-11-25T01:13:32ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052012-11-0113130910.1186/1471-2105-13-309An assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomesResende Daniela MRezende Antônio MOliveira Nesley JDBatista Izabella CACorrêa-Oliveira RodrigoReis Alexandre BRuiz Jeronimo C<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Epitope prediction using computational methods represents one of the most promising approaches to vaccine development. Reduction of time, cost, and the availability of completely sequenced genomes are key points and highly motivating regarding the use of reverse vaccinology. Parasites of genus <it>Leishmania</it> are widely spread and they are the etiologic agents of leishmaniasis. Currently, there is no efficient vaccine against this pathogen and the drug treatment is highly toxic. The lack of sufficiently large datasets of experimentally validated parasites epitopes represents a serious limitation, especially for trypanomatids genomes. In this work we highlight the predictive performances of several algorithms that were evaluated through the development of a MySQL database built with the purpose of: a) evaluating individual algorithms prediction performances and their combination for CD8+ T cell epitopes, B-cell epitopes and subcellular localization by means of AUC (Area Under Curve) performance and a threshold dependent method that employs a confusion matrix; b) integrating data from experimentally validated and <it>in silico</it> predicted epitopes; and c) integrating the subcellular localization predictions and experimental data. NetCTL, NetMHC, BepiPred, BCPred12, and AAP12 algorithms were used for <it>in silico</it> epitope prediction and WoLF PSORT, Sigcleave and TargetP for <it>in silico</it> subcellular localization prediction against trypanosomatid genomes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A database-driven epitope prediction method was developed with built-in functions that were capable of: a) removing experimental data redundancy; b) parsing algorithms predictions and storage experimental validated and predict data; and c) evaluating algorithm performances. Results show that a better performance is achieved when the combined prediction is considered. This is particularly true for B cell epitope predictors, where the combined prediction of AAP12 and BCPred12 reached an AUC value of 0.77. For T CD8+ epitope predictors, the combined prediction of NetCTL and NetMHC reached an AUC value of 0.64. Finally, regarding the subcellular localization prediction, the best performance is achieved when the combined prediction of Sigcleave, TargetP and WoLF PSORT is used.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our study indicates that the combination of B cells epitope predictors is the best tool for predicting epitopes on protozoan parasites proteins. Regarding subcellular localization, the best result was obtained when the three algorithms predictions were combined. The developed pipeline is available upon request to authors.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/309 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Resende Daniela M Rezende Antônio M Oliveira Nesley JD Batista Izabella CA Corrêa-Oliveira Rodrigo Reis Alexandre B Ruiz Jeronimo C |
spellingShingle |
Resende Daniela M Rezende Antônio M Oliveira Nesley JD Batista Izabella CA Corrêa-Oliveira Rodrigo Reis Alexandre B Ruiz Jeronimo C An assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomes BMC Bioinformatics |
author_facet |
Resende Daniela M Rezende Antônio M Oliveira Nesley JD Batista Izabella CA Corrêa-Oliveira Rodrigo Reis Alexandre B Ruiz Jeronimo C |
author_sort |
Resende Daniela M |
title |
An assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomes |
title_short |
An assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomes |
title_full |
An assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomes |
title_fullStr |
An assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomes |
title_full_unstemmed |
An assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomes |
title_sort |
assessment on epitope prediction methods for protozoa genomes |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Bioinformatics |
issn |
1471-2105 |
publishDate |
2012-11-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Epitope prediction using computational methods represents one of the most promising approaches to vaccine development. Reduction of time, cost, and the availability of completely sequenced genomes are key points and highly motivating regarding the use of reverse vaccinology. Parasites of genus <it>Leishmania</it> are widely spread and they are the etiologic agents of leishmaniasis. Currently, there is no efficient vaccine against this pathogen and the drug treatment is highly toxic. The lack of sufficiently large datasets of experimentally validated parasites epitopes represents a serious limitation, especially for trypanomatids genomes. In this work we highlight the predictive performances of several algorithms that were evaluated through the development of a MySQL database built with the purpose of: a) evaluating individual algorithms prediction performances and their combination for CD8+ T cell epitopes, B-cell epitopes and subcellular localization by means of AUC (Area Under Curve) performance and a threshold dependent method that employs a confusion matrix; b) integrating data from experimentally validated and <it>in silico</it> predicted epitopes; and c) integrating the subcellular localization predictions and experimental data. NetCTL, NetMHC, BepiPred, BCPred12, and AAP12 algorithms were used for <it>in silico</it> epitope prediction and WoLF PSORT, Sigcleave and TargetP for <it>in silico</it> subcellular localization prediction against trypanosomatid genomes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A database-driven epitope prediction method was developed with built-in functions that were capable of: a) removing experimental data redundancy; b) parsing algorithms predictions and storage experimental validated and predict data; and c) evaluating algorithm performances. Results show that a better performance is achieved when the combined prediction is considered. This is particularly true for B cell epitope predictors, where the combined prediction of AAP12 and BCPred12 reached an AUC value of 0.77. For T CD8+ epitope predictors, the combined prediction of NetCTL and NetMHC reached an AUC value of 0.64. Finally, regarding the subcellular localization prediction, the best performance is achieved when the combined prediction of Sigcleave, TargetP and WoLF PSORT is used.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our study indicates that the combination of B cells epitope predictors is the best tool for predicting epitopes on protozoan parasites proteins. Regarding subcellular localization, the best result was obtained when the three algorithms predictions were combined. The developed pipeline is available upon request to authors.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/309 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT resendedanielam anassessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT rezendeantoniom anassessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT oliveiranesleyjd anassessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT batistaizabellaca anassessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT correaoliveirarodrigo anassessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT reisalexandreb anassessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT ruizjeronimoc anassessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT resendedanielam assessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT rezendeantoniom assessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT oliveiranesleyjd assessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT batistaizabellaca assessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT correaoliveirarodrigo assessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT reisalexandreb assessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes AT ruizjeronimoc assessmentonepitopepredictionmethodsforprotozoagenomes |
_version_ |
1725161750309896192 |