Child mortality estimation: An assessment of summary birth history methods using microsimulation

<b>Background</b>: Two types of indirect methods for estimating child mortality rates from summary birth histories (number of children ever born and children dead) are currently available to users: model-based methods derived from the pioneering work of Brass and empirically based method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrea Verhulst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 2016-06-01
Series:Demographic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol34/39/
id doaj-32e90d51c4ce4a439dcc291e065568d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32e90d51c4ce4a439dcc291e065568d42020-11-24T22:01:59ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712016-06-01343910.4054/DemRes.2016.34.392881Child mortality estimation: An assessment of summary birth history methods using microsimulationAndrea Verhulst0University of California, Los Angeles<b>Background</b>: Two types of indirect methods for estimating child mortality rates from summary birth histories (number of children ever born and children dead) are currently available to users: model-based methods derived from the pioneering work of Brass and empirically based methods developed more recently at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). <b>Objective</b>: The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of six alternative indirect methodsbased on summary birth histories. <b>Methods</b>: Using microsimulation based on the 1950-2010 fertility and mortality rates of the United Nations' World Population Prospects, estimates generated by six alternative indirect methods were compared against benchmark direct estimates for 82 countries. <b>Results</b>: The results show that the IHME methods outperform the classical Brass method. In particular, the cohort-derived method is able to produce robust past child mortality trends across a variety of demographic regimes. However, no method produces robust recent estimates prior to data collection. When data are classified by time since first birth, methods perform better than with maternal age classification. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study suggests that the maternal age variant of the IHME cohort-derived method is the best option for estimating child mortality from past censuses. For future censuses, it would be worthwhile adding an extra question on date of first birth. <b>Contribution</b>: This study provides new recommendations on which method to use depending on the data available, as well as for future population census collection.https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol34/39/Brass modelindirect methodsInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)summary birth historiestime since first birthunder-five mortality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Verhulst
spellingShingle Andrea Verhulst
Child mortality estimation: An assessment of summary birth history methods using microsimulation
Demographic Research
Brass model
indirect methods
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
summary birth histories
time since first birth
under-five mortality
author_facet Andrea Verhulst
author_sort Andrea Verhulst
title Child mortality estimation: An assessment of summary birth history methods using microsimulation
title_short Child mortality estimation: An assessment of summary birth history methods using microsimulation
title_full Child mortality estimation: An assessment of summary birth history methods using microsimulation
title_fullStr Child mortality estimation: An assessment of summary birth history methods using microsimulation
title_full_unstemmed Child mortality estimation: An assessment of summary birth history methods using microsimulation
title_sort child mortality estimation: an assessment of summary birth history methods using microsimulation
publisher Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
series Demographic Research
issn 1435-9871
publishDate 2016-06-01
description <b>Background</b>: Two types of indirect methods for estimating child mortality rates from summary birth histories (number of children ever born and children dead) are currently available to users: model-based methods derived from the pioneering work of Brass and empirically based methods developed more recently at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). <b>Objective</b>: The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of six alternative indirect methodsbased on summary birth histories. <b>Methods</b>: Using microsimulation based on the 1950-2010 fertility and mortality rates of the United Nations' World Population Prospects, estimates generated by six alternative indirect methods were compared against benchmark direct estimates for 82 countries. <b>Results</b>: The results show that the IHME methods outperform the classical Brass method. In particular, the cohort-derived method is able to produce robust past child mortality trends across a variety of demographic regimes. However, no method produces robust recent estimates prior to data collection. When data are classified by time since first birth, methods perform better than with maternal age classification. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study suggests that the maternal age variant of the IHME cohort-derived method is the best option for estimating child mortality from past censuses. For future censuses, it would be worthwhile adding an extra question on date of first birth. <b>Contribution</b>: This study provides new recommendations on which method to use depending on the data available, as well as for future population census collection.
topic Brass model
indirect methods
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
summary birth histories
time since first birth
under-five mortality
url https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol34/39/
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaverhulst childmortalityestimationanassessmentofsummarybirthhistorymethodsusingmicrosimulation
_version_ 1725837556585594880