Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities
Indigenous peoples living in remote areas are often reliant on Governments for essential services and local economic development opportunities. Collaboration and partnership in resource planning and management is espoused as an approach that can provide multiple benefits for all stakeholders includi...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427 |
id |
doaj-332f7643a3a84ddfbdb933dc52d47e9b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-332f7643a3a84ddfbdb933dc52d47e9b2020-11-25T00:30:26ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-01-0111242710.3390/su11020427su11020427Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian CommunitiesMelissa Jackson0Rodney A. Stewart1Kelly S. Fielding2Jessie Cochrane3Cara D. Beal4School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Communication and Arts, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, QLD, AustraliaWater Corporation, Perth 6007, WA, AustraliaCities Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, QLD, AustraliaIndigenous peoples living in remote areas are often reliant on Governments for essential services and local economic development opportunities. Collaboration and partnership in resource planning and management is espoused as an approach that can provide multiple benefits for all stakeholders including more robust and long-lasting decisions, relationship-building and trust between government and community members as well as capacity building and empowerment of citizens. In Australia however, little evidence from the remote Indigenous community context is available to inform successful collaborations. This paper presents novel research using thematic analysis of practitioner interviews and document review to analyse the current situation of service-provider- remote community engagement and collaboration for sustainable water and energy management. An adapted typology of Indigenous engagement is applied as an analytical framework, categorising water and energy management initiatives according to four key types, each with varying levels of collaboration and implications for sustainable water and energy. Application of the typology shows that technocratic approaches to community engagement continue to dominate this space as collaborative processes are constrained by a range of institutional, governance, technical and cultural factors. The findings have implications for research, policy and practice, and point to a need for a systemic approach to address barriers and facilitate genuine collaboration.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427collaborationindigenoussustainable watersustainable energycommunity developmentsystemic |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Melissa Jackson Rodney A. Stewart Kelly S. Fielding Jessie Cochrane Cara D. Beal |
spellingShingle |
Melissa Jackson Rodney A. Stewart Kelly S. Fielding Jessie Cochrane Cara D. Beal Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities Sustainability collaboration indigenous sustainable water sustainable energy community development systemic |
author_facet |
Melissa Jackson Rodney A. Stewart Kelly S. Fielding Jessie Cochrane Cara D. Beal |
author_sort |
Melissa Jackson |
title |
Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities |
title_short |
Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities |
title_full |
Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities |
title_fullStr |
Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities |
title_sort |
collaborating for sustainable water and energy management: assessment and categorisation of indigenous involvement in remote australian communities |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Indigenous peoples living in remote areas are often reliant on Governments for essential services and local economic development opportunities. Collaboration and partnership in resource planning and management is espoused as an approach that can provide multiple benefits for all stakeholders including more robust and long-lasting decisions, relationship-building and trust between government and community members as well as capacity building and empowerment of citizens. In Australia however, little evidence from the remote Indigenous community context is available to inform successful collaborations. This paper presents novel research using thematic analysis of practitioner interviews and document review to analyse the current situation of service-provider- remote community engagement and collaboration for sustainable water and energy management. An adapted typology of Indigenous engagement is applied as an analytical framework, categorising water and energy management initiatives according to four key types, each with varying levels of collaboration and implications for sustainable water and energy. Application of the typology shows that technocratic approaches to community engagement continue to dominate this space as collaborative processes are constrained by a range of institutional, governance, technical and cultural factors. The findings have implications for research, policy and practice, and point to a need for a systemic approach to address barriers and facilitate genuine collaboration. |
topic |
collaboration indigenous sustainable water sustainable energy community development systemic |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT melissajackson collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities AT rodneyastewart collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities AT kellysfielding collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities AT jessiecochrane collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities AT caradbeal collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities |
_version_ |
1725326588123283456 |