Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities

Indigenous peoples living in remote areas are often reliant on Governments for essential services and local economic development opportunities. Collaboration and partnership in resource planning and management is espoused as an approach that can provide multiple benefits for all stakeholders includi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa Jackson, Rodney A. Stewart, Kelly S. Fielding, Jessie Cochrane, Cara D. Beal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427
id doaj-332f7643a3a84ddfbdb933dc52d47e9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-332f7643a3a84ddfbdb933dc52d47e9b2020-11-25T00:30:26ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-01-0111242710.3390/su11020427su11020427Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian CommunitiesMelissa Jackson0Rodney A. Stewart1Kelly S. Fielding2Jessie Cochrane3Cara D. Beal4School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Communication and Arts, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, QLD, AustraliaWater Corporation, Perth 6007, WA, AustraliaCities Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, QLD, AustraliaIndigenous peoples living in remote areas are often reliant on Governments for essential services and local economic development opportunities. Collaboration and partnership in resource planning and management is espoused as an approach that can provide multiple benefits for all stakeholders including more robust and long-lasting decisions, relationship-building and trust between government and community members as well as capacity building and empowerment of citizens. In Australia however, little evidence from the remote Indigenous community context is available to inform successful collaborations. This paper presents novel research using thematic analysis of practitioner interviews and document review to analyse the current situation of service-provider- remote community engagement and collaboration for sustainable water and energy management. An adapted typology of Indigenous engagement is applied as an analytical framework, categorising water and energy management initiatives according to four key types, each with varying levels of collaboration and implications for sustainable water and energy. Application of the typology shows that technocratic approaches to community engagement continue to dominate this space as collaborative processes are constrained by a range of institutional, governance, technical and cultural factors. The findings have implications for research, policy and practice, and point to a need for a systemic approach to address barriers and facilitate genuine collaboration.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427collaborationindigenoussustainable watersustainable energycommunity developmentsystemic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melissa Jackson
Rodney A. Stewart
Kelly S. Fielding
Jessie Cochrane
Cara D. Beal
spellingShingle Melissa Jackson
Rodney A. Stewart
Kelly S. Fielding
Jessie Cochrane
Cara D. Beal
Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities
Sustainability
collaboration
indigenous
sustainable water
sustainable energy
community development
systemic
author_facet Melissa Jackson
Rodney A. Stewart
Kelly S. Fielding
Jessie Cochrane
Cara D. Beal
author_sort Melissa Jackson
title Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities
title_short Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities
title_full Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities
title_fullStr Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities
title_full_unstemmed Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities
title_sort collaborating for sustainable water and energy management: assessment and categorisation of indigenous involvement in remote australian communities
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Indigenous peoples living in remote areas are often reliant on Governments for essential services and local economic development opportunities. Collaboration and partnership in resource planning and management is espoused as an approach that can provide multiple benefits for all stakeholders including more robust and long-lasting decisions, relationship-building and trust between government and community members as well as capacity building and empowerment of citizens. In Australia however, little evidence from the remote Indigenous community context is available to inform successful collaborations. This paper presents novel research using thematic analysis of practitioner interviews and document review to analyse the current situation of service-provider- remote community engagement and collaboration for sustainable water and energy management. An adapted typology of Indigenous engagement is applied as an analytical framework, categorising water and energy management initiatives according to four key types, each with varying levels of collaboration and implications for sustainable water and energy. Application of the typology shows that technocratic approaches to community engagement continue to dominate this space as collaborative processes are constrained by a range of institutional, governance, technical and cultural factors. The findings have implications for research, policy and practice, and point to a need for a systemic approach to address barriers and facilitate genuine collaboration.
topic collaboration
indigenous
sustainable water
sustainable energy
community development
systemic
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427
work_keys_str_mv AT melissajackson collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities
AT rodneyastewart collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities
AT kellysfielding collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities
AT jessiecochrane collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities
AT caradbeal collaboratingforsustainablewaterandenergymanagementassessmentandcategorisationofindigenousinvolvementinremoteaustraliancommunities
_version_ 1725326588123283456