ASPECTS OF A RHETORIC OF THE BODY AND THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS

<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica;">Although the expansion of New Testament Studies to formal studies in Early Christianity and Late Antiquity have significantly changed modi of interpretation concerning Pauline material, the Cartesian effect has not been laid to res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johannes N. Vorster
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Stellenbosch University 2012-08-01
Series:Scriptura
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scriptura.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/4
id doaj-333756a3ae004ae492ce83fd52aff969
record_format Article
spelling doaj-333756a3ae004ae492ce83fd52aff9692020-11-25T03:14:51ZafrStellenbosch UniversityScriptura0254-18072305-445X2012-08-01108129431310.7833/108-1-4ASPECTS OF A RHETORIC OF THE BODY AND THE LETTER TO THE ROMANSJohannes N. Vorster<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica;">Although the expansion of New Testament Studies to formal studies in Early Christianity and Late Antiquity have significantly changed modi of interpretation concerning Pauline material, the Cartesian effect has not been laid to rest. In addition, despite the problematisation of knowledge production which was initiated during the eighties of the twentieth century, the subject as primary originator of knowledge, born during the nineteenth century, is still haunting the production of knowledge within the field of Pauline studies, with little concern for the variety of diverse discursive practices compelling and enabling the production of a writing. Both these tendencies have infused the rhetorical paradigm within which Pauline letters have been read. I argue that a rhetoric of the body, functioning within the implicit tradition of Rhetorical Criticism, can enable the detection of discursive traces constituting a rhetoric of the body in the Graeco-Roman world. If a rhetoric of the body is used as interpretative framework for the letter to the Romans, no resistance against the Roman Empire can be discerned but rather an identification with a <em>habitus</em> that made a radicalisation of the Roman regulatory body possible.</span></p><p> </p><p><br />doi: 10.7833/108-1-4</p>http://scriptura.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/4Rhetoric of the bodyRhetorical criticismJudith ButlerPierre BourdieuMichel FoucaultDiscursive practiceCorporal epistemologyRomans 2-3 Romans 8Power and knowledge
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johannes N. Vorster
spellingShingle Johannes N. Vorster
ASPECTS OF A RHETORIC OF THE BODY AND THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS
Scriptura
Rhetoric of the body
Rhetorical criticism
Judith Butler
Pierre Bourdieu
Michel Foucault
Discursive practice
Corporal epistemology
Romans 2-3 Romans 8
Power and knowledge
author_facet Johannes N. Vorster
author_sort Johannes N. Vorster
title ASPECTS OF A RHETORIC OF THE BODY AND THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS
title_short ASPECTS OF A RHETORIC OF THE BODY AND THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS
title_full ASPECTS OF A RHETORIC OF THE BODY AND THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS
title_fullStr ASPECTS OF A RHETORIC OF THE BODY AND THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS
title_full_unstemmed ASPECTS OF A RHETORIC OF THE BODY AND THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS
title_sort aspects of a rhetoric of the body and the letter to the romans
publisher Stellenbosch University
series Scriptura
issn 0254-1807
2305-445X
publishDate 2012-08-01
description <p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica;">Although the expansion of New Testament Studies to formal studies in Early Christianity and Late Antiquity have significantly changed modi of interpretation concerning Pauline material, the Cartesian effect has not been laid to rest. In addition, despite the problematisation of knowledge production which was initiated during the eighties of the twentieth century, the subject as primary originator of knowledge, born during the nineteenth century, is still haunting the production of knowledge within the field of Pauline studies, with little concern for the variety of diverse discursive practices compelling and enabling the production of a writing. Both these tendencies have infused the rhetorical paradigm within which Pauline letters have been read. I argue that a rhetoric of the body, functioning within the implicit tradition of Rhetorical Criticism, can enable the detection of discursive traces constituting a rhetoric of the body in the Graeco-Roman world. If a rhetoric of the body is used as interpretative framework for the letter to the Romans, no resistance against the Roman Empire can be discerned but rather an identification with a <em>habitus</em> that made a radicalisation of the Roman regulatory body possible.</span></p><p> </p><p><br />doi: 10.7833/108-1-4</p>
topic Rhetoric of the body
Rhetorical criticism
Judith Butler
Pierre Bourdieu
Michel Foucault
Discursive practice
Corporal epistemology
Romans 2-3 Romans 8
Power and knowledge
url http://scriptura.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/4
work_keys_str_mv AT johannesnvorster aspectsofarhetoricofthebodyandthelettertotheromans
_version_ 1724642006911680512