SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET

Abstract Background A high SUV-reproducibility is crucial when different PET scanners are in use. We evaluated the SUV variability in whole-body FDG-PET scans of patients with suspected or proven cancer using an EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET scanner. In a head-to-head comparison we st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniëlle Koopman, Pieter L. Jager, Cornelis H. Slump, Siert Knollema, Jorn A. van Dalen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-12-01
Series:EJNMMI Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0569-7
id doaj-3356ba6cb46e430f98d1c4231c8193e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3356ba6cb46e430f98d1c4231c8193e92020-12-13T12:18:35ZengSpringerOpenEJNMMI Research2191-219X2019-12-01911810.1186/s13550-019-0569-7SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PETDaniëlle Koopman0Pieter L. Jager1Cornelis H. Slump2Siert Knollema3Jorn A. van Dalen4Department of Nuclear Medicine, IsalaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IsalaTechnical Medicine Center, University of TwenteDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, IsalaDepartment of Medical Physics, IsalaAbstract Background A high SUV-reproducibility is crucial when different PET scanners are in use. We evaluated the SUV variability in whole-body FDG-PET scans of patients with suspected or proven cancer using an EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET scanner. In a head-to-head comparison we studied images of 50 patients acquired on a conventional scanner (cPET, Ingenuity TF PET/CT, Philips) and compared them with images acquired on a digital scanner (dPET, Vereos PET/CT, Philips). The PET scanning order was randomised and EARL-compatible reconstructions were applied. We measured SUVmean, SUVpeak, SUVmax and lesion diameter in up to 5 FDG-positive lesions per patient. The relative difference ΔSUV between cPET and dPET was calculated for each SUV-parameter. Furthermore, we calculated repeatability coefficients, reflecting the 95% confidence interval of ΔSUV. Results We included 128 lesions with an average size of 19 ± 14 mm. Average ΔSUVs were 6-8% with dPET values being higher for all three SUV-parameters (p < 0.001). ΔSUVmax was significantly higher than ΔSUVmean (8% vs. 6%, p = 0.002) and than ΔSUVpeak (8% vs. 7%, p = 0.03). Repeatability coefficients across individual lesions were 27% (ΔSUVmean and ΔSUVpeak) and 33% (ΔSUVmax) (p < 0.001). Conclusions With EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET, we found a limited SUV variability with average differences up to 8%. Furthermore, only a limited number of lesions showed a SUV difference of more than 30%. These findings indicate that EARL standardisation works. Trial registration This prospective study was registered on the 31th of October 2017 at ClinicalTrials.cov. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03457506?id=03457506&rank=1.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0569-7FDG-PETEARL-accreditationConventional PETDigital PETCancer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniëlle Koopman
Pieter L. Jager
Cornelis H. Slump
Siert Knollema
Jorn A. van Dalen
spellingShingle Daniëlle Koopman
Pieter L. Jager
Cornelis H. Slump
Siert Knollema
Jorn A. van Dalen
SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET
EJNMMI Research
FDG-PET
EARL-accreditation
Conventional PET
Digital PET
Cancer
author_facet Daniëlle Koopman
Pieter L. Jager
Cornelis H. Slump
Siert Knollema
Jorn A. van Dalen
author_sort Daniëlle Koopman
title SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET
title_short SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET
title_full SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET
title_fullStr SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET
title_full_unstemmed SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET
title_sort suv variability in earl-accredited conventional and digital pet
publisher SpringerOpen
series EJNMMI Research
issn 2191-219X
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Background A high SUV-reproducibility is crucial when different PET scanners are in use. We evaluated the SUV variability in whole-body FDG-PET scans of patients with suspected or proven cancer using an EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET scanner. In a head-to-head comparison we studied images of 50 patients acquired on a conventional scanner (cPET, Ingenuity TF PET/CT, Philips) and compared them with images acquired on a digital scanner (dPET, Vereos PET/CT, Philips). The PET scanning order was randomised and EARL-compatible reconstructions were applied. We measured SUVmean, SUVpeak, SUVmax and lesion diameter in up to 5 FDG-positive lesions per patient. The relative difference ΔSUV between cPET and dPET was calculated for each SUV-parameter. Furthermore, we calculated repeatability coefficients, reflecting the 95% confidence interval of ΔSUV. Results We included 128 lesions with an average size of 19 ± 14 mm. Average ΔSUVs were 6-8% with dPET values being higher for all three SUV-parameters (p < 0.001). ΔSUVmax was significantly higher than ΔSUVmean (8% vs. 6%, p = 0.002) and than ΔSUVpeak (8% vs. 7%, p = 0.03). Repeatability coefficients across individual lesions were 27% (ΔSUVmean and ΔSUVpeak) and 33% (ΔSUVmax) (p < 0.001). Conclusions With EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET, we found a limited SUV variability with average differences up to 8%. Furthermore, only a limited number of lesions showed a SUV difference of more than 30%. These findings indicate that EARL standardisation works. Trial registration This prospective study was registered on the 31th of October 2017 at ClinicalTrials.cov. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03457506?id=03457506&rank=1.
topic FDG-PET
EARL-accreditation
Conventional PET
Digital PET
Cancer
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0569-7
work_keys_str_mv AT daniellekoopman suvvariabilityinearlaccreditedconventionalanddigitalpet
AT pieterljager suvvariabilityinearlaccreditedconventionalanddigitalpet
AT cornelishslump suvvariabilityinearlaccreditedconventionalanddigitalpet
AT siertknollema suvvariabilityinearlaccreditedconventionalanddigitalpet
AT jornavandalen suvvariabilityinearlaccreditedconventionalanddigitalpet
_version_ 1724384868761075712