The Group Nurturance Inventory — initial psychometric evaluation using Rasch and factor analysis
Abstract Background This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a behavioral assessment instrument primarily intended for use with workgroups in any type of organization. The instrument was developed based on the Nurturing Environments framework which describes four domains i...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11474-5 |
id |
doaj-336bcbc3dd664ecf9fdc03f0e2958053 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-336bcbc3dd664ecf9fdc03f0e29580532021-08-01T11:13:38ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-07-0121111510.1186/s12889-021-11474-5The Group Nurturance Inventory — initial psychometric evaluation using Rasch and factor analysisMagnus Johansson0Anthony Biglan1Department of Behavioural Science, Oslo Metropolitan UniversityOregon Research InstituteAbstract Background This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a behavioral assessment instrument primarily intended for use with workgroups in any type of organization. The instrument was developed based on the Nurturing Environments framework which describes four domains important for health, well-being, and productivity; minimizing toxic social interactions, teaching and reinforcing prosocial behaviors, limiting opportunities for problem behaviors, and promoting psychological flexibility. The instrument is freely available to use and adapt under a CC-BY license and intended as a tool that is easy for any group to use and interpret to identify key behaviors to improve their psychosocial work environment. Methods Questionnaire data of perceived frequency of behaviors relevant to nurturance were collected from nine different organizations in Sweden. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, Rasch analysis, and correlations to investigate relationships with relevant workplace measures. Results The results indicate that the 23-item instrument is usefully divided in two factors, which can be described as risk and protective factors. Toxic social behaviors make up the risk factor, while the protective factor includes prosocial behavior, behaviors that limit problems, and psychological flexibility. Rasch analysis showed that the response categories work as intended for all items, item fit is satisfactory, and there was no significant differential item functioning across age or gender. Targeting indicates that measurement precision is skewed towards lower levels of both factors, while item thresholds are distributed over the range of participant abilities, particularly for the protective factor. A Rasch score table is available for ordinal to interval data transformation. Conclusions This initial analysis shows promising results, while more data is needed to investigate group-level measurement properties and validation against concrete longitudinal outcomes. We provide recommendations for how to work in practice with a group based on their assessment data, and how to optimize the measurement precision further. By using a two-dimensional assessment with ratings of both frequency and perceived importance of behaviors the instrument can help facilitate a participatory group development process. The Group Nurturance Inventory is freely available to use and adapt for both commercial and non-commercial use and could help promote transparent assessment practices in organizational and group development.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11474-5Nurturing environmentsRaschPsychometricsOrganizationsMeasurementOpen science |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Magnus Johansson Anthony Biglan |
spellingShingle |
Magnus Johansson Anthony Biglan The Group Nurturance Inventory — initial psychometric evaluation using Rasch and factor analysis BMC Public Health Nurturing environments Rasch Psychometrics Organizations Measurement Open science |
author_facet |
Magnus Johansson Anthony Biglan |
author_sort |
Magnus Johansson |
title |
The Group Nurturance Inventory — initial psychometric evaluation using Rasch and factor analysis |
title_short |
The Group Nurturance Inventory — initial psychometric evaluation using Rasch and factor analysis |
title_full |
The Group Nurturance Inventory — initial psychometric evaluation using Rasch and factor analysis |
title_fullStr |
The Group Nurturance Inventory — initial psychometric evaluation using Rasch and factor analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Group Nurturance Inventory — initial psychometric evaluation using Rasch and factor analysis |
title_sort |
group nurturance inventory — initial psychometric evaluation using rasch and factor analysis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a behavioral assessment instrument primarily intended for use with workgroups in any type of organization. The instrument was developed based on the Nurturing Environments framework which describes four domains important for health, well-being, and productivity; minimizing toxic social interactions, teaching and reinforcing prosocial behaviors, limiting opportunities for problem behaviors, and promoting psychological flexibility. The instrument is freely available to use and adapt under a CC-BY license and intended as a tool that is easy for any group to use and interpret to identify key behaviors to improve their psychosocial work environment. Methods Questionnaire data of perceived frequency of behaviors relevant to nurturance were collected from nine different organizations in Sweden. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, Rasch analysis, and correlations to investigate relationships with relevant workplace measures. Results The results indicate that the 23-item instrument is usefully divided in two factors, which can be described as risk and protective factors. Toxic social behaviors make up the risk factor, while the protective factor includes prosocial behavior, behaviors that limit problems, and psychological flexibility. Rasch analysis showed that the response categories work as intended for all items, item fit is satisfactory, and there was no significant differential item functioning across age or gender. Targeting indicates that measurement precision is skewed towards lower levels of both factors, while item thresholds are distributed over the range of participant abilities, particularly for the protective factor. A Rasch score table is available for ordinal to interval data transformation. Conclusions This initial analysis shows promising results, while more data is needed to investigate group-level measurement properties and validation against concrete longitudinal outcomes. We provide recommendations for how to work in practice with a group based on their assessment data, and how to optimize the measurement precision further. By using a two-dimensional assessment with ratings of both frequency and perceived importance of behaviors the instrument can help facilitate a participatory group development process. The Group Nurturance Inventory is freely available to use and adapt for both commercial and non-commercial use and could help promote transparent assessment practices in organizational and group development. |
topic |
Nurturing environments Rasch Psychometrics Organizations Measurement Open science |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11474-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT magnusjohansson thegroupnurturanceinventoryinitialpsychometricevaluationusingraschandfactoranalysis AT anthonybiglan thegroupnurturanceinventoryinitialpsychometricevaluationusingraschandfactoranalysis AT magnusjohansson groupnurturanceinventoryinitialpsychometricevaluationusingraschandfactoranalysis AT anthonybiglan groupnurturanceinventoryinitialpsychometricevaluationusingraschandfactoranalysis |
_version_ |
1721246077594632192 |