Barak’s Purposive Interpretation in Law as a Pattern of Constitutional Interpretative Fidelity
Political jurisprudence points out that constitutional court judges sometimes act like political actors, and that their decisions are a function of strategic and ideological as much as legal considerations. Consequently, the proper role of the courts, notably in exercising their review of constituti...
Main Author: | Marinković Tanasije |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Baltic Journal of Law & Politics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2016-0013 |
Similar Items
-
A Critical Look at the Subjective and Objective Purposes of Contract in Aharon Barak’s Theory of Interpretation
by: Mirić Marija Karanikić
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Interpretive logic of the General Assembly of Iran’s Administrative Justice Court in Taxation lawsuits
by: Hossein Abdollahi
Published: (2020-11-01) -
The Legal Boundaries of ‘Public Purpose’ in India and South Africa: A Comparative Assessment in Light of the Voluntary Guidelines
by: Björn Hoops, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
THE CONCEPTS AND THE ESSENCE OF INTERPRETATION OF LAW
by: Viktor Bilous, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR SELF-RESTRAINT : SOME INSIGHT INTO THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
by: Radian Salman, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)