Differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior.

Weak cell-surface adhesion of cell lines to tissue culture surfaces is a common problem and presents technical limitations to the design of experiments. To overcome this problem, various surface coating protocols have been developed. However, a comparative and precise real-time measurement of their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle S Liberio, Martin C Sadowski, Carolina Soekmadji, Rohan A Davis, Colleen C Nelson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4223027?pdf=render
id doaj-33b8e568550442799e47cad1c3fd3d72
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33b8e568550442799e47cad1c3fd3d722020-11-25T01:21:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01911e11212210.1371/journal.pone.0112122Differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior.Michelle S LiberioMartin C SadowskiCarolina SoekmadjiRohan A DavisColleen C NelsonWeak cell-surface adhesion of cell lines to tissue culture surfaces is a common problem and presents technical limitations to the design of experiments. To overcome this problem, various surface coating protocols have been developed. However, a comparative and precise real-time measurement of their impact on cell behavior has not been conducted. The prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, derived from a patient lymph node metastasis, is a commonly used model system in prostate cancer research. However, the cells' characteristically weak attachment to the surface of tissue culture vessels and cover slips has impeded their manipulation and analysis and use in high throughput screening. To improve the adherence of LNCaP cells to the culture surface, we compared different coating reagents (poly-L-lysine, poly-L-ornithine, collagen type IV, fibronectin, and laminin) and culturing conditions and analyzed their impact on cell proliferation, adhesion, morphology, mobility and gene expression using real-time technologies. The results showed that fibronectin, poly-L-lysine and poly-L-ornithine improved LNCaP cells adherence and provoked cell morphology alterations, such as increase of nuclear and cellular area. These coating reagents also induced a higher expression of F-actin and reduced cell mobility. In contrast, laminin and collagen type IV did not improve adherence but promoted cell aggregation and affected cell morphology. Cells cultured in the presence of laminin displayed higher mobility than control cells. All the coating conditions significantly affected cell viability; however, they did not affect the expression of androgen receptor-regulated genes. Our comparative findings provide important insight for the selection of the ideal coating reagent and culture conditions for the cancer cell lines with respect to their effect on proliferation rate, attachment, morphology, migration, transcriptional response and cellular cytoskeleton arrangement.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4223027?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michelle S Liberio
Martin C Sadowski
Carolina Soekmadji
Rohan A Davis
Colleen C Nelson
spellingShingle Michelle S Liberio
Martin C Sadowski
Carolina Soekmadji
Rohan A Davis
Colleen C Nelson
Differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Michelle S Liberio
Martin C Sadowski
Carolina Soekmadji
Rohan A Davis
Colleen C Nelson
author_sort Michelle S Liberio
title Differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior.
title_short Differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior.
title_full Differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior.
title_fullStr Differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior.
title_full_unstemmed Differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior.
title_sort differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Weak cell-surface adhesion of cell lines to tissue culture surfaces is a common problem and presents technical limitations to the design of experiments. To overcome this problem, various surface coating protocols have been developed. However, a comparative and precise real-time measurement of their impact on cell behavior has not been conducted. The prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, derived from a patient lymph node metastasis, is a commonly used model system in prostate cancer research. However, the cells' characteristically weak attachment to the surface of tissue culture vessels and cover slips has impeded their manipulation and analysis and use in high throughput screening. To improve the adherence of LNCaP cells to the culture surface, we compared different coating reagents (poly-L-lysine, poly-L-ornithine, collagen type IV, fibronectin, and laminin) and culturing conditions and analyzed their impact on cell proliferation, adhesion, morphology, mobility and gene expression using real-time technologies. The results showed that fibronectin, poly-L-lysine and poly-L-ornithine improved LNCaP cells adherence and provoked cell morphology alterations, such as increase of nuclear and cellular area. These coating reagents also induced a higher expression of F-actin and reduced cell mobility. In contrast, laminin and collagen type IV did not improve adherence but promoted cell aggregation and affected cell morphology. Cells cultured in the presence of laminin displayed higher mobility than control cells. All the coating conditions significantly affected cell viability; however, they did not affect the expression of androgen receptor-regulated genes. Our comparative findings provide important insight for the selection of the ideal coating reagent and culture conditions for the cancer cell lines with respect to their effect on proliferation rate, attachment, morphology, migration, transcriptional response and cellular cytoskeleton arrangement.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4223027?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT michellesliberio differentialeffectsoftissueculturecoatingsubstratesonprostatecancercelladherencemorphologyandbehavior
AT martincsadowski differentialeffectsoftissueculturecoatingsubstratesonprostatecancercelladherencemorphologyandbehavior
AT carolinasoekmadji differentialeffectsoftissueculturecoatingsubstratesonprostatecancercelladherencemorphologyandbehavior
AT rohanadavis differentialeffectsoftissueculturecoatingsubstratesonprostatecancercelladherencemorphologyandbehavior
AT colleencnelson differentialeffectsoftissueculturecoatingsubstratesonprostatecancercelladherencemorphologyandbehavior
_version_ 1725129155966664704