Investigation on the Rationality of the Extant Ways of Scoring the Interpersonal Reactivity Index Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis
As the most frequently used tool for measuring empathy, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) is often scored by researchers arbitrarily and casually. Many commonly used IRI scoring approaches and their corresponding measurement models are unverified, which may make the conclusions of subsequent...
Main Authors: | Yang Wang, Yun Li, Wanting Xiao, Yuanshu Fu, Jing Jie |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01086/full |
Similar Items
-
Comparative analysis and validation of the Portuguese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index
by: Lucas Francisco Manarte, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender groups of the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index
by: Dennis Grevenstein
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy
by: Tavakol Sina, et al.
Published: (2011-08-01) -
Does Engagement Build Empathy for Shared Water Resources? Results from the Use of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index during a Mobile Water Allocation Experimental Decision Laboratory
by: Lori Bradford, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Multi-dimensional Emotional Empathy Scale in the South African context
by: Chantal Olckers, et al.
Published: (2010-11-01)