Examining Procrastination Across Multiple Goal Stages: A Longitudinal Study of Temporal Motivation Theory

Procrastination is among the most common of motivational failures, putting off despite expecting to be worse off. We examine this dynamic phenomenon in a detailed and realistic longitudinal design (Study 1) as well as in a large correlational data set (N = 7400; Study 2). The results are largely con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piers Steel, Frode Svartdal, Tomas Thundiyil, Thomas Brothen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00327/full
id doaj-343061085d704a21ac1b909d179f03c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-343061085d704a21ac1b909d179f03c92020-11-25T01:58:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-04-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00327353498Examining Procrastination Across Multiple Goal Stages: A Longitudinal Study of Temporal Motivation TheoryPiers Steel0Frode Svartdal1Tomas Thundiyil2Thomas Brothen3Human Resources & Organizational Behaviour, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, CanadaDepartment of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NorwayHuman Resources & Organizational Behaviour, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesProcrastination is among the most common of motivational failures, putting off despite expecting to be worse off. We examine this dynamic phenomenon in a detailed and realistic longitudinal design (Study 1) as well as in a large correlational data set (N = 7400; Study 2). The results are largely consistent with temporal motivation theory. People’s pacing style reflects a hyperbolic curve, with the steepness of the curve predicted by self-reported procrastination. Procrastination is related to intention-action gaps, but not intentions. Procrastinators are susceptible to proximity of temptation and to the temporal separation between their intention and the planned act; the more distal, the greater the gap. Critical self-regulatory skills in explaining procrastination are attention control, energy regulation and automaticity, accounting for 74% of the variance. Future research using this design is recommended, as it provides an almost ideal blend of realism and detailed longitudinal assessment.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00327/fullprocrastinationtemporal trajectoriesmotivationself-regulationlongitudinalpacing style
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Piers Steel
Frode Svartdal
Tomas Thundiyil
Thomas Brothen
spellingShingle Piers Steel
Frode Svartdal
Tomas Thundiyil
Thomas Brothen
Examining Procrastination Across Multiple Goal Stages: A Longitudinal Study of Temporal Motivation Theory
Frontiers in Psychology
procrastination
temporal trajectories
motivation
self-regulation
longitudinal
pacing style
author_facet Piers Steel
Frode Svartdal
Tomas Thundiyil
Thomas Brothen
author_sort Piers Steel
title Examining Procrastination Across Multiple Goal Stages: A Longitudinal Study of Temporal Motivation Theory
title_short Examining Procrastination Across Multiple Goal Stages: A Longitudinal Study of Temporal Motivation Theory
title_full Examining Procrastination Across Multiple Goal Stages: A Longitudinal Study of Temporal Motivation Theory
title_fullStr Examining Procrastination Across Multiple Goal Stages: A Longitudinal Study of Temporal Motivation Theory
title_full_unstemmed Examining Procrastination Across Multiple Goal Stages: A Longitudinal Study of Temporal Motivation Theory
title_sort examining procrastination across multiple goal stages: a longitudinal study of temporal motivation theory
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Procrastination is among the most common of motivational failures, putting off despite expecting to be worse off. We examine this dynamic phenomenon in a detailed and realistic longitudinal design (Study 1) as well as in a large correlational data set (N = 7400; Study 2). The results are largely consistent with temporal motivation theory. People’s pacing style reflects a hyperbolic curve, with the steepness of the curve predicted by self-reported procrastination. Procrastination is related to intention-action gaps, but not intentions. Procrastinators are susceptible to proximity of temptation and to the temporal separation between their intention and the planned act; the more distal, the greater the gap. Critical self-regulatory skills in explaining procrastination are attention control, energy regulation and automaticity, accounting for 74% of the variance. Future research using this design is recommended, as it provides an almost ideal blend of realism and detailed longitudinal assessment.
topic procrastination
temporal trajectories
motivation
self-regulation
longitudinal
pacing style
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00327/full
work_keys_str_mv AT pierssteel examiningprocrastinationacrossmultiplegoalstagesalongitudinalstudyoftemporalmotivationtheory
AT frodesvartdal examiningprocrastinationacrossmultiplegoalstagesalongitudinalstudyoftemporalmotivationtheory
AT tomasthundiyil examiningprocrastinationacrossmultiplegoalstagesalongitudinalstudyoftemporalmotivationtheory
AT thomasbrothen examiningprocrastinationacrossmultiplegoalstagesalongitudinalstudyoftemporalmotivationtheory
_version_ 1724970894150860800