A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
PURPOSE:Development of a supervised machine-learning model capable of predicting clinically relevant molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from diffusion-weighted-imaging-derived radiomic features. METHODS:The retrospective observational study assessed 55 surgical PDAC patien...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218642 |
id |
doaj-3434cfb8429941578a776ec1a13e5f52 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3434cfb8429941578a776ec1a13e5f522021-03-03T21:06:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011410e021864210.1371/journal.pone.0218642A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.Georgios KaissisSebastian ZiegelmayerFabian LohöferKatja SteigerHana AlgülAlexander MuckenhuberHsi-Yu YenErnst RummenyHelmut FriessRoland SchmidWilko WeichertJens T SivekeRickmer BrarenPURPOSE:Development of a supervised machine-learning model capable of predicting clinically relevant molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from diffusion-weighted-imaging-derived radiomic features. METHODS:The retrospective observational study assessed 55 surgical PDAC patients. Molecular subtypes were defined by immunohistochemical staining of KRT81. Tumors were manually segmented and 1606 radiomic features were extracted with PyRadiomics. A gradient-boosted-tree algorithm was trained on 70% of the patients (N = 28) and tested on 30% (N = 17) to predict KRT81+ vs. KRT81- tumor subtypes. A gradient-boosted survival regression model was fit to the disease-free and overall survival data. Chemotherapy response and survival were assessed stratified by subtype and radiomic signature. Radiomic feature importance was ranked. RESULTS:The mean±STDEV sensitivity, specificity and ROC-AUC were 0.90±0.07, 0.92±0.11, and 0.93±0.07, respectively. The mean±STDEV concordance indices between the disease-free and overall survival predicted by the model based on the radiomic parameters and actual patient survival were 0.76±0.05 and 0.71±0.06, respectively. Patients with a KRT81+ subtype experienced significantly diminished median overall survival compared to KRT81- patients (7.0 vs. 22.6 months, HR 4.03, log-rank-test P = <0.001) and a significantly improved response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy over FOLFIRINOX (10.14 vs. 3.8 months median overall survival, HR 2.33, P = 0.037) compared to KRT81- patients, who responded significantly better to FOLFIRINOX over gemcitabine-based treatment (30.8 vs. 13.4 months median overall survival, HR 2.41, P = 0.027). Entropy was ranked as the most important radiomic feature. CONCLUSIONS:The machine-learning based analysis of radiomic features enables the prediction of subtypes of PDAC, which are highly relevant for disease-free and overall patient survival and response to chemotherapy.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218642 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Georgios Kaissis Sebastian Ziegelmayer Fabian Lohöfer Katja Steiger Hana Algül Alexander Muckenhuber Hsi-Yu Yen Ernst Rummeny Helmut Friess Roland Schmid Wilko Weichert Jens T Siveke Rickmer Braren |
spellingShingle |
Georgios Kaissis Sebastian Ziegelmayer Fabian Lohöfer Katja Steiger Hana Algül Alexander Muckenhuber Hsi-Yu Yen Ernst Rummeny Helmut Friess Roland Schmid Wilko Weichert Jens T Siveke Rickmer Braren A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Georgios Kaissis Sebastian Ziegelmayer Fabian Lohöfer Katja Steiger Hana Algül Alexander Muckenhuber Hsi-Yu Yen Ernst Rummeny Helmut Friess Roland Schmid Wilko Weichert Jens T Siveke Rickmer Braren |
author_sort |
Georgios Kaissis |
title |
A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. |
title_short |
A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. |
title_full |
A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. |
title_fullStr |
A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. |
title_full_unstemmed |
A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. |
title_sort |
machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus folfirinox chemotherapy. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
PURPOSE:Development of a supervised machine-learning model capable of predicting clinically relevant molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from diffusion-weighted-imaging-derived radiomic features. METHODS:The retrospective observational study assessed 55 surgical PDAC patients. Molecular subtypes were defined by immunohistochemical staining of KRT81. Tumors were manually segmented and 1606 radiomic features were extracted with PyRadiomics. A gradient-boosted-tree algorithm was trained on 70% of the patients (N = 28) and tested on 30% (N = 17) to predict KRT81+ vs. KRT81- tumor subtypes. A gradient-boosted survival regression model was fit to the disease-free and overall survival data. Chemotherapy response and survival were assessed stratified by subtype and radiomic signature. Radiomic feature importance was ranked. RESULTS:The mean±STDEV sensitivity, specificity and ROC-AUC were 0.90±0.07, 0.92±0.11, and 0.93±0.07, respectively. The mean±STDEV concordance indices between the disease-free and overall survival predicted by the model based on the radiomic parameters and actual patient survival were 0.76±0.05 and 0.71±0.06, respectively. Patients with a KRT81+ subtype experienced significantly diminished median overall survival compared to KRT81- patients (7.0 vs. 22.6 months, HR 4.03, log-rank-test P = <0.001) and a significantly improved response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy over FOLFIRINOX (10.14 vs. 3.8 months median overall survival, HR 2.33, P = 0.037) compared to KRT81- patients, who responded significantly better to FOLFIRINOX over gemcitabine-based treatment (30.8 vs. 13.4 months median overall survival, HR 2.41, P = 0.027). Entropy was ranked as the most important radiomic feature. CONCLUSIONS:The machine-learning based analysis of radiomic features enables the prediction of subtypes of PDAC, which are highly relevant for disease-free and overall patient survival and response to chemotherapy. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218642 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT georgioskaissis amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT sebastianziegelmayer amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT fabianlohofer amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT katjasteiger amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT hanaalgul amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT alexandermuckenhuber amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT hsiyuyen amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT ernstrummeny amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT helmutfriess amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT rolandschmid amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT wilkoweichert amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT jenstsiveke amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT rickmerbraren amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT georgioskaissis machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT sebastianziegelmayer machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT fabianlohofer machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT katjasteiger machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT hanaalgul machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT alexandermuckenhuber machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT hsiyuyen machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT ernstrummeny machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT helmutfriess machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT rolandschmid machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT wilkoweichert machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT jenstsiveke machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy AT rickmerbraren machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy |
_version_ |
1714818646144974848 |