A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.

PURPOSE:Development of a supervised machine-learning model capable of predicting clinically relevant molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from diffusion-weighted-imaging-derived radiomic features. METHODS:The retrospective observational study assessed 55 surgical PDAC patien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgios Kaissis, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Fabian Lohöfer, Katja Steiger, Hana Algül, Alexander Muckenhuber, Hsi-Yu Yen, Ernst Rummeny, Helmut Friess, Roland Schmid, Wilko Weichert, Jens T Siveke, Rickmer Braren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218642
id doaj-3434cfb8429941578a776ec1a13e5f52
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3434cfb8429941578a776ec1a13e5f522021-03-03T21:06:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011410e021864210.1371/journal.pone.0218642A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.Georgios KaissisSebastian ZiegelmayerFabian LohöferKatja SteigerHana AlgülAlexander MuckenhuberHsi-Yu YenErnst RummenyHelmut FriessRoland SchmidWilko WeichertJens T SivekeRickmer BrarenPURPOSE:Development of a supervised machine-learning model capable of predicting clinically relevant molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from diffusion-weighted-imaging-derived radiomic features. METHODS:The retrospective observational study assessed 55 surgical PDAC patients. Molecular subtypes were defined by immunohistochemical staining of KRT81. Tumors were manually segmented and 1606 radiomic features were extracted with PyRadiomics. A gradient-boosted-tree algorithm was trained on 70% of the patients (N = 28) and tested on 30% (N = 17) to predict KRT81+ vs. KRT81- tumor subtypes. A gradient-boosted survival regression model was fit to the disease-free and overall survival data. Chemotherapy response and survival were assessed stratified by subtype and radiomic signature. Radiomic feature importance was ranked. RESULTS:The mean±STDEV sensitivity, specificity and ROC-AUC were 0.90±0.07, 0.92±0.11, and 0.93±0.07, respectively. The mean±STDEV concordance indices between the disease-free and overall survival predicted by the model based on the radiomic parameters and actual patient survival were 0.76±0.05 and 0.71±0.06, respectively. Patients with a KRT81+ subtype experienced significantly diminished median overall survival compared to KRT81- patients (7.0 vs. 22.6 months, HR 4.03, log-rank-test P = <0.001) and a significantly improved response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy over FOLFIRINOX (10.14 vs. 3.8 months median overall survival, HR 2.33, P = 0.037) compared to KRT81- patients, who responded significantly better to FOLFIRINOX over gemcitabine-based treatment (30.8 vs. 13.4 months median overall survival, HR 2.41, P = 0.027). Entropy was ranked as the most important radiomic feature. CONCLUSIONS:The machine-learning based analysis of radiomic features enables the prediction of subtypes of PDAC, which are highly relevant for disease-free and overall patient survival and response to chemotherapy.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218642
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Georgios Kaissis
Sebastian Ziegelmayer
Fabian Lohöfer
Katja Steiger
Hana Algül
Alexander Muckenhuber
Hsi-Yu Yen
Ernst Rummeny
Helmut Friess
Roland Schmid
Wilko Weichert
Jens T Siveke
Rickmer Braren
spellingShingle Georgios Kaissis
Sebastian Ziegelmayer
Fabian Lohöfer
Katja Steiger
Hana Algül
Alexander Muckenhuber
Hsi-Yu Yen
Ernst Rummeny
Helmut Friess
Roland Schmid
Wilko Weichert
Jens T Siveke
Rickmer Braren
A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Georgios Kaissis
Sebastian Ziegelmayer
Fabian Lohöfer
Katja Steiger
Hana Algül
Alexander Muckenhuber
Hsi-Yu Yen
Ernst Rummeny
Helmut Friess
Roland Schmid
Wilko Weichert
Jens T Siveke
Rickmer Braren
author_sort Georgios Kaissis
title A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
title_short A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
title_full A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
title_fullStr A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
title_full_unstemmed A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
title_sort machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus folfirinox chemotherapy.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description PURPOSE:Development of a supervised machine-learning model capable of predicting clinically relevant molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from diffusion-weighted-imaging-derived radiomic features. METHODS:The retrospective observational study assessed 55 surgical PDAC patients. Molecular subtypes were defined by immunohistochemical staining of KRT81. Tumors were manually segmented and 1606 radiomic features were extracted with PyRadiomics. A gradient-boosted-tree algorithm was trained on 70% of the patients (N = 28) and tested on 30% (N = 17) to predict KRT81+ vs. KRT81- tumor subtypes. A gradient-boosted survival regression model was fit to the disease-free and overall survival data. Chemotherapy response and survival were assessed stratified by subtype and radiomic signature. Radiomic feature importance was ranked. RESULTS:The mean±STDEV sensitivity, specificity and ROC-AUC were 0.90±0.07, 0.92±0.11, and 0.93±0.07, respectively. The mean±STDEV concordance indices between the disease-free and overall survival predicted by the model based on the radiomic parameters and actual patient survival were 0.76±0.05 and 0.71±0.06, respectively. Patients with a KRT81+ subtype experienced significantly diminished median overall survival compared to KRT81- patients (7.0 vs. 22.6 months, HR 4.03, log-rank-test P = <0.001) and a significantly improved response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy over FOLFIRINOX (10.14 vs. 3.8 months median overall survival, HR 2.33, P = 0.037) compared to KRT81- patients, who responded significantly better to FOLFIRINOX over gemcitabine-based treatment (30.8 vs. 13.4 months median overall survival, HR 2.41, P = 0.027). Entropy was ranked as the most important radiomic feature. CONCLUSIONS:The machine-learning based analysis of radiomic features enables the prediction of subtypes of PDAC, which are highly relevant for disease-free and overall patient survival and response to chemotherapy.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218642
work_keys_str_mv AT georgioskaissis amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT sebastianziegelmayer amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT fabianlohofer amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT katjasteiger amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT hanaalgul amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT alexandermuckenhuber amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT hsiyuyen amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT ernstrummeny amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT helmutfriess amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT rolandschmid amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT wilkoweichert amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT jenstsiveke amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT rickmerbraren amachinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT georgioskaissis machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT sebastianziegelmayer machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT fabianlohofer machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT katjasteiger machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT hanaalgul machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT alexandermuckenhuber machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT hsiyuyen machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT ernstrummeny machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT helmutfriess machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT rolandschmid machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT wilkoweichert machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT jenstsiveke machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
AT rickmerbraren machinelearningalgorithmpredictsmolecularsubtypesinpancreaticductaladenocarcinomawithdifferentialresponsetogemcitabinebasedversusfolfirinoxchemotherapy
_version_ 1714818646144974848