Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change
Abstract There are more than 580 natural areas in Oregon and Washington managed by 20 federal, state, local, and private agencies and organizations. This natural areas network is unparalleled in its representation of the diverse ecosystems found in the Pacific Northwest, and could prove useful for m...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Ecosphere |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1563 |
id |
doaj-343c380b8a9e4de7a282cf07cb8e9c51 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-343c380b8a9e4de7a282cf07cb8e9c512020-11-25T02:28:16ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252016-11-01711n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.1563Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate changeMargaret H. Massie0Todd M. Wilson1Anita T. Morzillo2Emilie B. Henderson3Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society Oregon State University 321 Richardson Hall Corvallis Oregon 97331 USAForestry Sciences Laboratory USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis Oregon 97331 USADepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut 06269 USAInstitute for Natural Resources P.O. Box 751 Portland Oregon 97207 USAAbstract There are more than 580 natural areas in Oregon and Washington managed by 20 federal, state, local, and private agencies and organizations. This natural areas network is unparalleled in its representation of the diverse ecosystems found in the Pacific Northwest, and could prove useful for monitoring long‐term ecological responses to climate change. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate potential effects of climate change on these natural areas and (2) develop strategies for selecting and prioritizing sites for long‐term monitoring. Bioclimatic and Random Forest modeling were used to identify subsets of natural areas to prioritize for long‐term monitoring efforts based on the current and projected (2020s, 2050s, 2080s) outputs from 13 future climate models. Projection consensus suggest some of the largest effects of climate change on natural areas may be the result of a substantial range increase in suitable climate for warmer‐adapted forest types coupled with a reduction in habitat for cooler‐adapted forest types. We identify four strategies that could be used for prioritizing sites and help manage and protect biodiversity in the Pacific Northwest, especially given uncertainty over climate change effects.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1563climate changeclimate envelopeclimate vulnerabilitylandscape monitoringnatural areas networkrandom forest |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Margaret H. Massie Todd M. Wilson Anita T. Morzillo Emilie B. Henderson |
spellingShingle |
Margaret H. Massie Todd M. Wilson Anita T. Morzillo Emilie B. Henderson Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change Ecosphere climate change climate envelope climate vulnerability landscape monitoring natural areas network random forest |
author_facet |
Margaret H. Massie Todd M. Wilson Anita T. Morzillo Emilie B. Henderson |
author_sort |
Margaret H. Massie |
title |
Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change |
title_short |
Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change |
title_full |
Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change |
title_fullStr |
Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change |
title_full_unstemmed |
Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change |
title_sort |
natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Ecosphere |
issn |
2150-8925 |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
Abstract There are more than 580 natural areas in Oregon and Washington managed by 20 federal, state, local, and private agencies and organizations. This natural areas network is unparalleled in its representation of the diverse ecosystems found in the Pacific Northwest, and could prove useful for monitoring long‐term ecological responses to climate change. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate potential effects of climate change on these natural areas and (2) develop strategies for selecting and prioritizing sites for long‐term monitoring. Bioclimatic and Random Forest modeling were used to identify subsets of natural areas to prioritize for long‐term monitoring efforts based on the current and projected (2020s, 2050s, 2080s) outputs from 13 future climate models. Projection consensus suggest some of the largest effects of climate change on natural areas may be the result of a substantial range increase in suitable climate for warmer‐adapted forest types coupled with a reduction in habitat for cooler‐adapted forest types. We identify four strategies that could be used for prioritizing sites and help manage and protect biodiversity in the Pacific Northwest, especially given uncertainty over climate change effects. |
topic |
climate change climate envelope climate vulnerability landscape monitoring natural areas network random forest |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1563 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT margarethmassie naturalareasasabasisforassessingecosystemvulnerabilitytoclimatechange AT toddmwilson naturalareasasabasisforassessingecosystemvulnerabilitytoclimatechange AT anitatmorzillo naturalareasasabasisforassessingecosystemvulnerabilitytoclimatechange AT emiliebhenderson naturalareasasabasisforassessingecosystemvulnerabilitytoclimatechange |
_version_ |
1724839411044057088 |