Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change

Abstract There are more than 580 natural areas in Oregon and Washington managed by 20 federal, state, local, and private agencies and organizations. This natural areas network is unparalleled in its representation of the diverse ecosystems found in the Pacific Northwest, and could prove useful for m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margaret H. Massie, Todd M. Wilson, Anita T. Morzillo, Emilie B. Henderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-11-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1563
id doaj-343c380b8a9e4de7a282cf07cb8e9c51
record_format Article
spelling doaj-343c380b8a9e4de7a282cf07cb8e9c512020-11-25T02:28:16ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252016-11-01711n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.1563Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate changeMargaret H. Massie0Todd M. Wilson1Anita T. Morzillo2Emilie B. Henderson3Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society Oregon State University 321 Richardson Hall Corvallis Oregon 97331 USAForestry Sciences Laboratory USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis Oregon 97331 USADepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut 06269 USAInstitute for Natural Resources P.O. Box 751 Portland Oregon 97207 USAAbstract There are more than 580 natural areas in Oregon and Washington managed by 20 federal, state, local, and private agencies and organizations. This natural areas network is unparalleled in its representation of the diverse ecosystems found in the Pacific Northwest, and could prove useful for monitoring long‐term ecological responses to climate change. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate potential effects of climate change on these natural areas and (2) develop strategies for selecting and prioritizing sites for long‐term monitoring. Bioclimatic and Random Forest modeling were used to identify subsets of natural areas to prioritize for long‐term monitoring efforts based on the current and projected (2020s, 2050s, 2080s) outputs from 13 future climate models. Projection consensus suggest some of the largest effects of climate change on natural areas may be the result of a substantial range increase in suitable climate for warmer‐adapted forest types coupled with a reduction in habitat for cooler‐adapted forest types. We identify four strategies that could be used for prioritizing sites and help manage and protect biodiversity in the Pacific Northwest, especially given uncertainty over climate change effects.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1563climate changeclimate envelopeclimate vulnerabilitylandscape monitoringnatural areas networkrandom forest
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Margaret H. Massie
Todd M. Wilson
Anita T. Morzillo
Emilie B. Henderson
spellingShingle Margaret H. Massie
Todd M. Wilson
Anita T. Morzillo
Emilie B. Henderson
Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change
Ecosphere
climate change
climate envelope
climate vulnerability
landscape monitoring
natural areas network
random forest
author_facet Margaret H. Massie
Todd M. Wilson
Anita T. Morzillo
Emilie B. Henderson
author_sort Margaret H. Massie
title Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change
title_short Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change
title_full Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change
title_fullStr Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change
title_full_unstemmed Natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change
title_sort natural areas as a basis for assessing ecosystem vulnerability to climate change
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Abstract There are more than 580 natural areas in Oregon and Washington managed by 20 federal, state, local, and private agencies and organizations. This natural areas network is unparalleled in its representation of the diverse ecosystems found in the Pacific Northwest, and could prove useful for monitoring long‐term ecological responses to climate change. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate potential effects of climate change on these natural areas and (2) develop strategies for selecting and prioritizing sites for long‐term monitoring. Bioclimatic and Random Forest modeling were used to identify subsets of natural areas to prioritize for long‐term monitoring efforts based on the current and projected (2020s, 2050s, 2080s) outputs from 13 future climate models. Projection consensus suggest some of the largest effects of climate change on natural areas may be the result of a substantial range increase in suitable climate for warmer‐adapted forest types coupled with a reduction in habitat for cooler‐adapted forest types. We identify four strategies that could be used for prioritizing sites and help manage and protect biodiversity in the Pacific Northwest, especially given uncertainty over climate change effects.
topic climate change
climate envelope
climate vulnerability
landscape monitoring
natural areas network
random forest
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1563
work_keys_str_mv AT margarethmassie naturalareasasabasisforassessingecosystemvulnerabilitytoclimatechange
AT toddmwilson naturalareasasabasisforassessingecosystemvulnerabilitytoclimatechange
AT anitatmorzillo naturalareasasabasisforassessingecosystemvulnerabilitytoclimatechange
AT emiliebhenderson naturalareasasabasisforassessingecosystemvulnerabilitytoclimatechange
_version_ 1724839411044057088