Verification of a Nondestructive Method for Assessing the Humidity of Saline Brick Walls in Historical Buildings

The paper presents the results of the verification of the neural method for assessing the humidity of saline brick walls. The method was previously developed by the authors and can be useful for the nondestructive assessment of the humidity of walls in historic buildings when destructive interventio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Hoła, Łukasz Sadowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/19/6926
Description
Summary:The paper presents the results of the verification of the neural method for assessing the humidity of saline brick walls. The method was previously developed by the authors and can be useful for the nondestructive assessment of the humidity of walls in historic buildings when destructive intervention during testing is not possible due to conservation restrictions. However, before being implemented in construction practice, this method requires validation by verification on other historic buildings, which to date has not been done. The paper presents the results of such verification, which has never been carried out before, and thus extends the scope of knowledge related to the issue. For experimental verification of the artificial neural network (ANN), the results of moisture tests of two selected historic buildings, other than those used for ANN learning and testing processes, were used. An artificial unidirectional multilayer neural network with backward error propagation and the algorithm for learning conjugate gradient (CG) was found to be useful for this purpose. The obtained satisfactory value of the linear correlation coefficient R of 0.807 and low average absolute error |Df| of 1.16% confirms this statement. The values of average relative error |<i>RE</i>| of 19.02%, which were obtained in this research, were not very high for an in-situ study. Moreover, the relative error values |<i>RE</i>| were mostly in the range of 15% to 25%.
ISSN:2076-3417