Comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: histological and histomorphometric evaluation.

The aim of this study was to compare the lateral window and osteotome techniques for sinus lifting using histological and histomorphometric methods.In this clinical trial 10 patients (a total number of 14 sinus areas) who needed implant treatment in the atrophic posterior maxilla were enrolled. In a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N Esfahanizadeh, A R Rokn, M Paknejad, P Motahari, H Daneshparvar, Ar Shamshiri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/750
id doaj-344debde3ea347e08580a7addea27651
record_format Article
spelling doaj-344debde3ea347e08580a7addea276512020-11-25T02:48:50ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesFrontiers in Dentistry2676-296X2012-09-0193Comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: histological and histomorphometric evaluation.N Esfahanizadeh0A R Rokn1M Paknejad2P Motahari3H Daneshparvar4Ar Shamshiri5Associated Professor, Department of Periodontics, Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran, Member of dental implant research center, Tehran university of medical sciences. The aim of this study was to compare the lateral window and osteotome techniques for sinus lifting using histological and histomorphometric methods.In this clinical trial 10 patients (a total number of 14 sinus areas) who needed implant treatment in the atrophic posterior maxilla were enrolled. In all the cases the residual bone height between the sinus floor and the alveolar crest was less than 5 mm. Sinus augmentation was performed. The treatment modality for a given residual bone height was selected randomly and Bio-Oss was applied in all the cases as the graft material. After a healing period of about 10 months, in all the cases, the implants were placed and biopsies of alveolar crestal bone were obtained at the same time; biopsy specimens were evaluated using histological and histomorphometric methods. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare distribution of variables in the two groups. Statistical significance was defined at Phttps://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/750Lateral Window TechniqueOsteotomeSinus Augmentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N Esfahanizadeh
A R Rokn
M Paknejad
P Motahari
H Daneshparvar
Ar Shamshiri
spellingShingle N Esfahanizadeh
A R Rokn
M Paknejad
P Motahari
H Daneshparvar
Ar Shamshiri
Comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: histological and histomorphometric evaluation.
Frontiers in Dentistry
Lateral Window Technique
Osteotome
Sinus Augmentation
author_facet N Esfahanizadeh
A R Rokn
M Paknejad
P Motahari
H Daneshparvar
Ar Shamshiri
author_sort N Esfahanizadeh
title Comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: histological and histomorphometric evaluation.
title_short Comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: histological and histomorphometric evaluation.
title_full Comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: histological and histomorphometric evaluation.
title_fullStr Comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: histological and histomorphometric evaluation.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: histological and histomorphometric evaluation.
title_sort comparison of lateral window and osteotome techniques in sinus augmentation: histological and histomorphometric evaluation.
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Frontiers in Dentistry
issn 2676-296X
publishDate 2012-09-01
description The aim of this study was to compare the lateral window and osteotome techniques for sinus lifting using histological and histomorphometric methods.In this clinical trial 10 patients (a total number of 14 sinus areas) who needed implant treatment in the atrophic posterior maxilla were enrolled. In all the cases the residual bone height between the sinus floor and the alveolar crest was less than 5 mm. Sinus augmentation was performed. The treatment modality for a given residual bone height was selected randomly and Bio-Oss was applied in all the cases as the graft material. After a healing period of about 10 months, in all the cases, the implants were placed and biopsies of alveolar crestal bone were obtained at the same time; biopsy specimens were evaluated using histological and histomorphometric methods. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare distribution of variables in the two groups. Statistical significance was defined at P
topic Lateral Window Technique
Osteotome
Sinus Augmentation
url https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/750
work_keys_str_mv AT nesfahanizadeh comparisonoflateralwindowandosteotometechniquesinsinusaugmentationhistologicalandhistomorphometricevaluation
AT arrokn comparisonoflateralwindowandosteotometechniquesinsinusaugmentationhistologicalandhistomorphometricevaluation
AT mpaknejad comparisonoflateralwindowandosteotometechniquesinsinusaugmentationhistologicalandhistomorphometricevaluation
AT pmotahari comparisonoflateralwindowandosteotometechniquesinsinusaugmentationhistologicalandhistomorphometricevaluation
AT hdaneshparvar comparisonoflateralwindowandosteotometechniquesinsinusaugmentationhistologicalandhistomorphometricevaluation
AT arshamshiri comparisonoflateralwindowandosteotometechniquesinsinusaugmentationhistologicalandhistomorphometricevaluation
_version_ 1724746361952272384