Meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and Life Cycle Assessment

Substitution of beef with alternative proteins is one practical trend taken by industry and consumers to reduce the negative impact of convenience products on the environment. Numerous products based on plant, insect and fungi proteins compete to replace beef burgers in an environmentally friendly a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sergiy Smetana, Adriano Profeta, Rieke Voigt, Christian Kircher, Volker Heinz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-12-01
Series:Future Foods
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833521000320
id doaj-345e984ef4f74b489a364bdeb5874526
record_format Article
spelling doaj-345e984ef4f74b489a364bdeb58745262021-06-01T04:24:52ZengElsevierFuture Foods2666-83352021-12-014100042Meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and Life Cycle AssessmentSergiy Smetana0Adriano Profeta1Rieke Voigt2Christian Kircher3Volker Heinz4German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Quakenbrück 49610, Germany; Corresponding author.German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Quakenbrück 49610, GermanyApplied University of Osnabrück, FoodSense, Albrechtstr. 30, Osnabrück 49076, GermanyGerman Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Quakenbrück 49610, GermanyGerman Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Quakenbrück 49610, GermanySubstitution of beef with alternative proteins is one practical trend taken by industry and consumers to reduce the negative impact of convenience products on the environment. Numerous products based on plant, insect and fungi proteins compete to replace beef burgers in an environmentally friendly and healthy way. At the same time, there is a lack of studies which assess different options from environmental impact perspective but also with consideration of production scales, recipes, nutritional values, and sensory properties. Therefore, the current study aimed to perform a holistic assessment (Life Cycle Assessment, sensory properties, and nutritional profile) of beef burgers in comparison to selected, alternative burgers, available on the market in Germany. The results indicated that alternative burgers based on plant, insect and mycoprotein biomass would be more environmentally friendly than beef burgers, but only a couple of them (insect-based and soy-based) have satisfying sensory or nutritional properties. Pea-based and mycoprotein-based burgers were perceived as average burgers from an environmental and sensorial perspective. The study demonstrated a sustainability differentiation system of meat analogs in convenience products using the multicriteria framework with inclusion of nutrient scoring, sensorial testing and Life Cycle Assessment.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833521000320Burger pattyEnvironmental impactNutri-scoreSensory analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sergiy Smetana
Adriano Profeta
Rieke Voigt
Christian Kircher
Volker Heinz
spellingShingle Sergiy Smetana
Adriano Profeta
Rieke Voigt
Christian Kircher
Volker Heinz
Meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and Life Cycle Assessment
Future Foods
Burger patty
Environmental impact
Nutri-score
Sensory analysis
author_facet Sergiy Smetana
Adriano Profeta
Rieke Voigt
Christian Kircher
Volker Heinz
author_sort Sergiy Smetana
title Meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and Life Cycle Assessment
title_short Meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and Life Cycle Assessment
title_full Meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and Life Cycle Assessment
title_fullStr Meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and Life Cycle Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and Life Cycle Assessment
title_sort meat substitution in burgers: nutritional scoring, sensorial testing, and life cycle assessment
publisher Elsevier
series Future Foods
issn 2666-8335
publishDate 2021-12-01
description Substitution of beef with alternative proteins is one practical trend taken by industry and consumers to reduce the negative impact of convenience products on the environment. Numerous products based on plant, insect and fungi proteins compete to replace beef burgers in an environmentally friendly and healthy way. At the same time, there is a lack of studies which assess different options from environmental impact perspective but also with consideration of production scales, recipes, nutritional values, and sensory properties. Therefore, the current study aimed to perform a holistic assessment (Life Cycle Assessment, sensory properties, and nutritional profile) of beef burgers in comparison to selected, alternative burgers, available on the market in Germany. The results indicated that alternative burgers based on plant, insect and mycoprotein biomass would be more environmentally friendly than beef burgers, but only a couple of them (insect-based and soy-based) have satisfying sensory or nutritional properties. Pea-based and mycoprotein-based burgers were perceived as average burgers from an environmental and sensorial perspective. The study demonstrated a sustainability differentiation system of meat analogs in convenience products using the multicriteria framework with inclusion of nutrient scoring, sensorial testing and Life Cycle Assessment.
topic Burger patty
Environmental impact
Nutri-score
Sensory analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833521000320
work_keys_str_mv AT sergiysmetana meatsubstitutioninburgersnutritionalscoringsensorialtestingandlifecycleassessment
AT adrianoprofeta meatsubstitutioninburgersnutritionalscoringsensorialtestingandlifecycleassessment
AT riekevoigt meatsubstitutioninburgersnutritionalscoringsensorialtestingandlifecycleassessment
AT christiankircher meatsubstitutioninburgersnutritionalscoringsensorialtestingandlifecycleassessment
AT volkerheinz meatsubstitutioninburgersnutritionalscoringsensorialtestingandlifecycleassessment
_version_ 1721411122444107776