IV Thrombolysis-Bridging and Endovascular Treatment for Occlusive Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Occlusion

Compared to other etiologies of ischemic stroke, occlusive internal carotid artery dissection responds worse to intravenous (IV) thrombolysis. Intracranial tandem occlusion is a predictor of poor outcome. A direct endovascular approach has been proposed as a safe and probably superior alternative to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filip Scheperjans, Johanna Pekkola, Satu Mustanoja, Jukka Putaala, Marjaana Tiainen, Leena Ollila, Tapio Paananen, Kimmo Lappalainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2012-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/335990
id doaj-3475710c9c4f4bcf81c01f832eb47401
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3475710c9c4f4bcf81c01f832eb474012020-11-25T01:23:42ZengKarger PublishersCase Reports in Neurology1662-680X2012-01-0141131910.1159/000335990335990IV Thrombolysis-Bridging and Endovascular Treatment for Occlusive Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem OcclusionFilip ScheperjansJohanna PekkolaSatu MustanojaJukka PutaalaMarjaana TiainenLeena OllilaTapio PaananenKimmo LappalainenCompared to other etiologies of ischemic stroke, occlusive internal carotid artery dissection responds worse to intravenous (IV) thrombolysis. Intracranial tandem occlusion is a predictor of poor outcome. A direct endovascular approach has been proposed as a safe and probably superior alternative to IV thrombolysis. However, it may lead to considerable treatment delays. We used rapidly initiated IV thrombolysis-bridging and subsequent endovascular treatment in two patients with severe hemispheric ischemia due to occlusive internal carotid artery dissection with tandem occlusion and achieved good outcomes. Minimizing recanalization times likely improves patient outcome and IV thrombolysis-bridging may be a reasonable strategy to achieve this. The positive initial results obtained with endovascular approaches and IV thrombolysis-bridging in this patient group deserve further scientific exploration.http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/335990Carotid stentingThrombolysisIschemic strokeThrombectomyCarotid artery dissection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Filip Scheperjans
Johanna Pekkola
Satu Mustanoja
Jukka Putaala
Marjaana Tiainen
Leena Ollila
Tapio Paananen
Kimmo Lappalainen
spellingShingle Filip Scheperjans
Johanna Pekkola
Satu Mustanoja
Jukka Putaala
Marjaana Tiainen
Leena Ollila
Tapio Paananen
Kimmo Lappalainen
IV Thrombolysis-Bridging and Endovascular Treatment for Occlusive Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Occlusion
Case Reports in Neurology
Carotid stenting
Thrombolysis
Ischemic stroke
Thrombectomy
Carotid artery dissection
author_facet Filip Scheperjans
Johanna Pekkola
Satu Mustanoja
Jukka Putaala
Marjaana Tiainen
Leena Ollila
Tapio Paananen
Kimmo Lappalainen
author_sort Filip Scheperjans
title IV Thrombolysis-Bridging and Endovascular Treatment for Occlusive Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Occlusion
title_short IV Thrombolysis-Bridging and Endovascular Treatment for Occlusive Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Occlusion
title_full IV Thrombolysis-Bridging and Endovascular Treatment for Occlusive Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Occlusion
title_fullStr IV Thrombolysis-Bridging and Endovascular Treatment for Occlusive Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Occlusion
title_full_unstemmed IV Thrombolysis-Bridging and Endovascular Treatment for Occlusive Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Occlusion
title_sort iv thrombolysis-bridging and endovascular treatment for occlusive internal carotid artery dissection with tandem occlusion
publisher Karger Publishers
series Case Reports in Neurology
issn 1662-680X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Compared to other etiologies of ischemic stroke, occlusive internal carotid artery dissection responds worse to intravenous (IV) thrombolysis. Intracranial tandem occlusion is a predictor of poor outcome. A direct endovascular approach has been proposed as a safe and probably superior alternative to IV thrombolysis. However, it may lead to considerable treatment delays. We used rapidly initiated IV thrombolysis-bridging and subsequent endovascular treatment in two patients with severe hemispheric ischemia due to occlusive internal carotid artery dissection with tandem occlusion and achieved good outcomes. Minimizing recanalization times likely improves patient outcome and IV thrombolysis-bridging may be a reasonable strategy to achieve this. The positive initial results obtained with endovascular approaches and IV thrombolysis-bridging in this patient group deserve further scientific exploration.
topic Carotid stenting
Thrombolysis
Ischemic stroke
Thrombectomy
Carotid artery dissection
url http://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/335990
work_keys_str_mv AT filipscheperjans ivthrombolysisbridgingandendovasculartreatmentforocclusiveinternalcarotidarterydissectionwithtandemocclusion
AT johannapekkola ivthrombolysisbridgingandendovasculartreatmentforocclusiveinternalcarotidarterydissectionwithtandemocclusion
AT satumustanoja ivthrombolysisbridgingandendovasculartreatmentforocclusiveinternalcarotidarterydissectionwithtandemocclusion
AT jukkaputaala ivthrombolysisbridgingandendovasculartreatmentforocclusiveinternalcarotidarterydissectionwithtandemocclusion
AT marjaanatiainen ivthrombolysisbridgingandendovasculartreatmentforocclusiveinternalcarotidarterydissectionwithtandemocclusion
AT leenaollila ivthrombolysisbridgingandendovasculartreatmentforocclusiveinternalcarotidarterydissectionwithtandemocclusion
AT tapiopaananen ivthrombolysisbridgingandendovasculartreatmentforocclusiveinternalcarotidarterydissectionwithtandemocclusion
AT kimmolappalainen ivthrombolysisbridgingandendovasculartreatmentforocclusiveinternalcarotidarterydissectionwithtandemocclusion
_version_ 1725120486260604928