Neuroimaging Findings on Amodal Completion: A Review

Amodal completion is the phenomenon of perceiving completed objects even though physically they are partially occluded. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of the results obtained from a variety of neuroimaging studies on the neural correlates of amodal completion. We discuss whether lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jordy Thielen, Sander E. Bosch, Tessa M. van Leeuwen, Marcel A. J. van Gerven, Rob van Lier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-04-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519840047
id doaj-3488849aad6a4f3bb00b332b7b289447
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3488849aad6a4f3bb00b332b7b2894472020-11-25T03:19:22ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952019-04-011010.1177/2041669519840047Neuroimaging Findings on Amodal Completion: A ReviewJordy ThielenSander E. BoschTessa M. van LeeuwenMarcel A. J. van GervenRob van LierAmodal completion is the phenomenon of perceiving completed objects even though physically they are partially occluded. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of the results obtained from a variety of neuroimaging studies on the neural correlates of amodal completion. We discuss whether low-level and high-level cortical areas are implicated in amodal completion; provide an overview of how amodal completion unfolds over time while dissociating feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes; and discuss how amodal completion is represented at the neuronal level. The involvement of low-level visual areas such as V1 and V2 is not yet clear, while several high-level structures such as the lateral occipital complex and fusiform face area seem invariant to occlusion of objects and faces, respectively, and several motor areas seem to code for object permanence. The variety of results on the timing of amodal completion hints to a mixture of feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes. We discuss whether the invisible parts of the occluded object are represented as if they were visible, contrary to a high-level representation. While plenty of questions on amodal completion remain, this review presents an overview of the neuroimaging findings reported to date, summarizes several insights from computational models, and connects research of other perceptual completion processes such as modal completion. In all, it is suggested that amodal completion is the solution to deal with various types of incomplete retinal information, and highly depends on stimulus complexity and saliency, and therefore also give rise to a variety of observed neural patterns.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519840047
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jordy Thielen
Sander E. Bosch
Tessa M. van Leeuwen
Marcel A. J. van Gerven
Rob van Lier
spellingShingle Jordy Thielen
Sander E. Bosch
Tessa M. van Leeuwen
Marcel A. J. van Gerven
Rob van Lier
Neuroimaging Findings on Amodal Completion: A Review
i-Perception
author_facet Jordy Thielen
Sander E. Bosch
Tessa M. van Leeuwen
Marcel A. J. van Gerven
Rob van Lier
author_sort Jordy Thielen
title Neuroimaging Findings on Amodal Completion: A Review
title_short Neuroimaging Findings on Amodal Completion: A Review
title_full Neuroimaging Findings on Amodal Completion: A Review
title_fullStr Neuroimaging Findings on Amodal Completion: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Neuroimaging Findings on Amodal Completion: A Review
title_sort neuroimaging findings on amodal completion: a review
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Amodal completion is the phenomenon of perceiving completed objects even though physically they are partially occluded. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of the results obtained from a variety of neuroimaging studies on the neural correlates of amodal completion. We discuss whether low-level and high-level cortical areas are implicated in amodal completion; provide an overview of how amodal completion unfolds over time while dissociating feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes; and discuss how amodal completion is represented at the neuronal level. The involvement of low-level visual areas such as V1 and V2 is not yet clear, while several high-level structures such as the lateral occipital complex and fusiform face area seem invariant to occlusion of objects and faces, respectively, and several motor areas seem to code for object permanence. The variety of results on the timing of amodal completion hints to a mixture of feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes. We discuss whether the invisible parts of the occluded object are represented as if they were visible, contrary to a high-level representation. While plenty of questions on amodal completion remain, this review presents an overview of the neuroimaging findings reported to date, summarizes several insights from computational models, and connects research of other perceptual completion processes such as modal completion. In all, it is suggested that amodal completion is the solution to deal with various types of incomplete retinal information, and highly depends on stimulus complexity and saliency, and therefore also give rise to a variety of observed neural patterns.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519840047
work_keys_str_mv AT jordythielen neuroimagingfindingsonamodalcompletionareview
AT sanderebosch neuroimagingfindingsonamodalcompletionareview
AT tessamvanleeuwen neuroimagingfindingsonamodalcompletionareview
AT marcelajvangerven neuroimagingfindingsonamodalcompletionareview
AT robvanlier neuroimagingfindingsonamodalcompletionareview
_version_ 1724622834501681152