Management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking survey

There is a growing recognition of the importance of government-owned capital assets, both conceptually and in practice, in large part due to the 2008 global financial crisis. However, a sizeable gap remains between the academic and professional “universe of knowledge” surrounding government asset m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olga Kaganova, Jeffrey Telgarsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2018-03-01
Series:International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/445
id doaj-34a04bfb3e6a4986a8d24fa618aaccf8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34a04bfb3e6a4986a8d24fa618aaccf82021-07-02T01:44:41ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management1648-715X1648-91792018-03-0122210.3846/ijspm.2018.445Management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking surveyOlga Kaganova0Jeffrey Telgarsky1Independent Consultant, 10717 Kings Riding Way, Rockville, MD, USANORC at the University of Chicago,4350 East-West Highway, 8th floor, Bethesda, MD, USA There is a growing recognition of the importance of government-owned capital assets, both conceptually and in practice, in large part due to the 2008 global financial crisis. However, a sizeable gap remains between the academic and professional “universe of knowledge” surrounding government asset management, and the actual asset management practiced by governments. In particular, the majority of governments around the world are wholly uninformed when it comes to good asset management. The purpose of this paper is to reduce this gap and suggest an instrument specifically for local governments, for the evaluation of their asset management, in order to help them to identify the weakest elements of asset management and thus focus limited resources on improving these elements. The instrument consists of essentially a composite image of good asset management practices for three main asset types: buildings, land, and infrastructure. The instrument specifies each asset management practice by its key characteristics and then converts each characteristic into a survey question. Answers are scored and a total score for each asset type is calculated. The assessment instrument can be used by local governments, their advisers, and by researchers interested in comparative analysis of asset management in different jurisdictions or countries. https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/445government-owned propertyasset managementassessmentlocal governmentland managementinfrastructure management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olga Kaganova
Jeffrey Telgarsky
spellingShingle Olga Kaganova
Jeffrey Telgarsky
Management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking survey
International Journal of Strategic Property Management
government-owned property
asset management
assessment
local government
land management
infrastructure management
author_facet Olga Kaganova
Jeffrey Telgarsky
author_sort Olga Kaganova
title Management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking survey
title_short Management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking survey
title_full Management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking survey
title_fullStr Management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking survey
title_full_unstemmed Management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking survey
title_sort management of capital assets by local governments: an assessment and benchmarking survey
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series International Journal of Strategic Property Management
issn 1648-715X
1648-9179
publishDate 2018-03-01
description There is a growing recognition of the importance of government-owned capital assets, both conceptually and in practice, in large part due to the 2008 global financial crisis. However, a sizeable gap remains between the academic and professional “universe of knowledge” surrounding government asset management, and the actual asset management practiced by governments. In particular, the majority of governments around the world are wholly uninformed when it comes to good asset management. The purpose of this paper is to reduce this gap and suggest an instrument specifically for local governments, for the evaluation of their asset management, in order to help them to identify the weakest elements of asset management and thus focus limited resources on improving these elements. The instrument consists of essentially a composite image of good asset management practices for three main asset types: buildings, land, and infrastructure. The instrument specifies each asset management practice by its key characteristics and then converts each characteristic into a survey question. Answers are scored and a total score for each asset type is calculated. The assessment instrument can be used by local governments, their advisers, and by researchers interested in comparative analysis of asset management in different jurisdictions or countries.
topic government-owned property
asset management
assessment
local government
land management
infrastructure management
url https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/445
work_keys_str_mv AT olgakaganova managementofcapitalassetsbylocalgovernmentsanassessmentandbenchmarkingsurvey
AT jeffreytelgarsky managementofcapitalassetsbylocalgovernmentsanassessmentandbenchmarkingsurvey
_version_ 1721344364586729472