Administrative Offense and Criminal Misconduct

The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of “administrative offense” and its relationship with a criminal offense. The article discusses the norms of administrative-tort legislation of the Soviet period, indicating the peculiarities of terminology in the definition of the concept of an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: N. I. Pobezhimova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Omsk Law Academy 2019-12-01
Series:Сибирское юридическое обозрение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/444
id doaj-34ddeea346334879ba4bbf4faf9de644
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34ddeea346334879ba4bbf4faf9de6442021-07-09T07:14:34ZrusOmsk Law AcademyСибирское юридическое обозрение2658-76022658-76102019-12-0116452552910.19073/2658-7602-2019-16-4-525-529443Administrative Offense and Criminal MisconductN. I. Pobezhimova0Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationThe article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of “administrative offense” and its relationship with a criminal offense. The article discusses the norms of administrative-tort legislation of the Soviet period, indicating the peculiarities of terminology in the definition of the concept of an administrative offense (misconduct). A retrospective study of the norms of administrative-tort legislation is carried out through a comparative legal analysis of the norms of the Code on Administrative Offenses of the RSFSR and the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The opinions of administrative scientists (Y. M. Kozlova, M. S. Studenikina,P. Shergin and others) about the nature of an administrative offense are investigated. The Author pays special attention to the idea of introducing a novel of criminal misconduct as an independent type of legal responsibility. The Author discusses, offering a reasoned point of view regarding the distinction between administrative offense, criminal misconduct and crime. A comparative analysis of the signs of an administrative offense and criminal misconduct is carried out with the most important characteristics of these phenomena highlighted. Based on the study, the Author substantiates the position regarding the existence of the institution of administrative responsibility, taking into account the novels proposed in science.https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/444administrative offense (misconduct)criminal misconductcrimeadministrative-tort lawlegal liabilityadministrative responsibilitysigns of an administrative offenseadministrative reform
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. I. Pobezhimova
spellingShingle N. I. Pobezhimova
Administrative Offense and Criminal Misconduct
Сибирское юридическое обозрение
administrative offense (misconduct)
criminal misconduct
crime
administrative-tort law
legal liability
administrative responsibility
signs of an administrative offense
administrative reform
author_facet N. I. Pobezhimova
author_sort N. I. Pobezhimova
title Administrative Offense and Criminal Misconduct
title_short Administrative Offense and Criminal Misconduct
title_full Administrative Offense and Criminal Misconduct
title_fullStr Administrative Offense and Criminal Misconduct
title_full_unstemmed Administrative Offense and Criminal Misconduct
title_sort administrative offense and criminal misconduct
publisher Omsk Law Academy
series Сибирское юридическое обозрение
issn 2658-7602
2658-7610
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of “administrative offense” and its relationship with a criminal offense. The article discusses the norms of administrative-tort legislation of the Soviet period, indicating the peculiarities of terminology in the definition of the concept of an administrative offense (misconduct). A retrospective study of the norms of administrative-tort legislation is carried out through a comparative legal analysis of the norms of the Code on Administrative Offenses of the RSFSR and the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The opinions of administrative scientists (Y. M. Kozlova, M. S. Studenikina,P. Shergin and others) about the nature of an administrative offense are investigated. The Author pays special attention to the idea of introducing a novel of criminal misconduct as an independent type of legal responsibility. The Author discusses, offering a reasoned point of view regarding the distinction between administrative offense, criminal misconduct and crime. A comparative analysis of the signs of an administrative offense and criminal misconduct is carried out with the most important characteristics of these phenomena highlighted. Based on the study, the Author substantiates the position regarding the existence of the institution of administrative responsibility, taking into account the novels proposed in science.
topic administrative offense (misconduct)
criminal misconduct
crime
administrative-tort law
legal liability
administrative responsibility
signs of an administrative offense
administrative reform
url https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/444
work_keys_str_mv AT nipobezhimova administrativeoffenseandcriminalmisconduct
_version_ 1721311594386817024