Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment
The building sector plays a central role in addressing the problem of global energy consumption. Therefore, effective design measures need to be taken to ensure efficient usage and management of new structures. The challenging task for designers is to reduce energy demands while maintaining a high-q...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7507 |
id |
doaj-3511e05a73954981aad476b055f80ddb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3511e05a73954981aad476b055f80ddb2020-11-25T01:55:10ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-09-01127507750710.3390/su12187507Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative AssessmentCarlo Iapige De Gaetani0Andrea Macchi1Pasquale Perri2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyThe building sector plays a central role in addressing the problem of global energy consumption. Therefore, effective design measures need to be taken to ensure efficient usage and management of new structures. The challenging task for designers is to reduce energy demands while maintaining a high-quality indoor environment and low costs of construction and operations. This study proposes a methodological framework that enables decision-makers to resolve conflicts between energy demand and life cycle costs. A case study is analyzed to validate the proposed method, adopting different solutions for walls, roofs, floors, windows, window-to-wall ratios and geographical locations. Models are created on the basis of all the possible combinations between these elements, enriched by their thermal properties and construction/management costs. After the alternative models are defined, energy analyses are carried out for an estimation of consumption. By calculating the total cost of each model as the sum of construction, energy and maintenance costs, a joint analysis is carried out for variable life cycles. The obtained results from the proposed method confirm the importance of a preliminary assessment from both energy and cost points of view, and demonstrate the impact of considering different building life cycles on the choice of design alternatives.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7507building information modelingenvironmental sustainabilitycost analysisdesign optioneering |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carlo Iapige De Gaetani Andrea Macchi Pasquale Perri |
spellingShingle |
Carlo Iapige De Gaetani Andrea Macchi Pasquale Perri Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment Sustainability building information modeling environmental sustainability cost analysis design optioneering |
author_facet |
Carlo Iapige De Gaetani Andrea Macchi Pasquale Perri |
author_sort |
Carlo Iapige De Gaetani |
title |
Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment |
title_short |
Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment |
title_full |
Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment |
title_fullStr |
Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment |
title_sort |
joint analysis of cost and energy savings for preliminary design alternative assessment |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
The building sector plays a central role in addressing the problem of global energy consumption. Therefore, effective design measures need to be taken to ensure efficient usage and management of new structures. The challenging task for designers is to reduce energy demands while maintaining a high-quality indoor environment and low costs of construction and operations. This study proposes a methodological framework that enables decision-makers to resolve conflicts between energy demand and life cycle costs. A case study is analyzed to validate the proposed method, adopting different solutions for walls, roofs, floors, windows, window-to-wall ratios and geographical locations. Models are created on the basis of all the possible combinations between these elements, enriched by their thermal properties and construction/management costs. After the alternative models are defined, energy analyses are carried out for an estimation of consumption. By calculating the total cost of each model as the sum of construction, energy and maintenance costs, a joint analysis is carried out for variable life cycles. The obtained results from the proposed method confirm the importance of a preliminary assessment from both energy and cost points of view, and demonstrate the impact of considering different building life cycles on the choice of design alternatives. |
topic |
building information modeling environmental sustainability cost analysis design optioneering |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7507 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carloiapigedegaetani jointanalysisofcostandenergysavingsforpreliminarydesignalternativeassessment AT andreamacchi jointanalysisofcostandenergysavingsforpreliminarydesignalternativeassessment AT pasqualeperri jointanalysisofcostandenergysavingsforpreliminarydesignalternativeassessment |
_version_ |
1724984595383844864 |