Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment

The building sector plays a central role in addressing the problem of global energy consumption. Therefore, effective design measures need to be taken to ensure efficient usage and management of new structures. The challenging task for designers is to reduce energy demands while maintaining a high-q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlo Iapige De Gaetani, Andrea Macchi, Pasquale Perri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7507
id doaj-3511e05a73954981aad476b055f80ddb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3511e05a73954981aad476b055f80ddb2020-11-25T01:55:10ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-09-01127507750710.3390/su12187507Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative AssessmentCarlo Iapige De Gaetani0Andrea Macchi1Pasquale Perri2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyThe building sector plays a central role in addressing the problem of global energy consumption. Therefore, effective design measures need to be taken to ensure efficient usage and management of new structures. The challenging task for designers is to reduce energy demands while maintaining a high-quality indoor environment and low costs of construction and operations. This study proposes a methodological framework that enables decision-makers to resolve conflicts between energy demand and life cycle costs. A case study is analyzed to validate the proposed method, adopting different solutions for walls, roofs, floors, windows, window-to-wall ratios and geographical locations. Models are created on the basis of all the possible combinations between these elements, enriched by their thermal properties and construction/management costs. After the alternative models are defined, energy analyses are carried out for an estimation of consumption. By calculating the total cost of each model as the sum of construction, energy and maintenance costs, a joint analysis is carried out for variable life cycles. The obtained results from the proposed method confirm the importance of a preliminary assessment from both energy and cost points of view, and demonstrate the impact of considering different building life cycles on the choice of design alternatives.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7507building information modelingenvironmental sustainabilitycost analysisdesign optioneering
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlo Iapige De Gaetani
Andrea Macchi
Pasquale Perri
spellingShingle Carlo Iapige De Gaetani
Andrea Macchi
Pasquale Perri
Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment
Sustainability
building information modeling
environmental sustainability
cost analysis
design optioneering
author_facet Carlo Iapige De Gaetani
Andrea Macchi
Pasquale Perri
author_sort Carlo Iapige De Gaetani
title Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment
title_short Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment
title_full Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment
title_fullStr Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Joint Analysis of Cost and Energy Savings for Preliminary Design Alternative Assessment
title_sort joint analysis of cost and energy savings for preliminary design alternative assessment
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-09-01
description The building sector plays a central role in addressing the problem of global energy consumption. Therefore, effective design measures need to be taken to ensure efficient usage and management of new structures. The challenging task for designers is to reduce energy demands while maintaining a high-quality indoor environment and low costs of construction and operations. This study proposes a methodological framework that enables decision-makers to resolve conflicts between energy demand and life cycle costs. A case study is analyzed to validate the proposed method, adopting different solutions for walls, roofs, floors, windows, window-to-wall ratios and geographical locations. Models are created on the basis of all the possible combinations between these elements, enriched by their thermal properties and construction/management costs. After the alternative models are defined, energy analyses are carried out for an estimation of consumption. By calculating the total cost of each model as the sum of construction, energy and maintenance costs, a joint analysis is carried out for variable life cycles. The obtained results from the proposed method confirm the importance of a preliminary assessment from both energy and cost points of view, and demonstrate the impact of considering different building life cycles on the choice of design alternatives.
topic building information modeling
environmental sustainability
cost analysis
design optioneering
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7507
work_keys_str_mv AT carloiapigedegaetani jointanalysisofcostandenergysavingsforpreliminarydesignalternativeassessment
AT andreamacchi jointanalysisofcostandenergysavingsforpreliminarydesignalternativeassessment
AT pasqualeperri jointanalysisofcostandenergysavingsforpreliminarydesignalternativeassessment
_version_ 1724984595383844864