Nifedipin versus magnesium sulfate for suppression of preterm labor: A randomized Clinical trial

Background: Preterm labor is a leading cause of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There are various kinds of drugs used to suppress the preterm labor, but they are not thoroughly effective. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of oral nifedipine with intravenous magnesium...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sedigheh Esmaeilzadeh, Mahbobe Ramezani, Zeinab Pahlevan, Sina Taheri, Faezeh Zabihi, Mojgan Naeimirad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2017-04-01
Series:Caspian Journal of Reproductive Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://caspjrm.ir/article-1-110-en.html
id doaj-3527cff6ea4e4601a327a0f00f6af539
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3527cff6ea4e4601a327a0f00f6af5392020-11-26T20:34:13ZengBabol University of Medical SciencesCaspian Journal of Reproductive Medicine2423-56602423-56602017-04-01312530Nifedipin versus magnesium sulfate for suppression of preterm labor: A randomized Clinical trialSedigheh Esmaeilzadeh0Mahbobe Ramezani1Zeinab Pahlevan2Sina Taheri3Faezeh Zabihi4Mojgan Naeimirad5 Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Full Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran, Tel: +981132274881 Student Research Committee , Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran Clinical Research Development Unite of Rouhani Hospital, Assistant of Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. Student Research Committee , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran Student Research Committee , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran Clinical Research Development Unite of Rouhani Hospital, Master of Science, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Babol Background: Preterm labor is a leading cause of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There are various kinds of drugs used to suppress the preterm labor, but they are not thoroughly effective. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of oral nifedipine with intravenous magnesium sulfate in delaying the preterm labor. Methods: A randomized, clinical trial was conducted in a hospital in Babol, Iran. One hundred twenty singleton pregnant women with preterm labor, 24-37 weeks of gestation, were randomly assigned to receive oral nifedipine or intravenous magnesium sulfate. The main outcome of the study was the inhibition of uterine and the secondary outcome was the side effect related to drugs and neonatal outcome. The data were analyzed with SPSS software, using chi-squared test and independent t test. Results: According to the results, in 35% of women in the nifedipine group and 23.3% of women in the magnesium sulfate group, the inhibited uterine contraction was less than 48 hours. Also, in 65.0% of women in the nifedipine group and 76.7% of women in the magnesium sulfate group, the inhibited uterine contraction was more than 48 hours. There was no significant difference between the nifedipine and the magnesium sulfate groups in the inhibition of uterine contraction in both less and more than 48 hours. The total side effects of medication were found to be lower in patients receiving oral nifedipine than those who received intravenous magnesium sulfate. (26.6 vs. 45.0) (p= 0.036). There was no significant difference in neonatal outcome between the two groups. Conclusion: Oral nifedipine should be a suitable alternative to intravenous magnesium sulfate in suppression preterm labor with fewer side effects.http://caspjrm.ir/article-1-110-en.htmlpreterm labornifedipinemagnesium sulfate.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sedigheh Esmaeilzadeh
Mahbobe Ramezani
Zeinab Pahlevan
Sina Taheri
Faezeh Zabihi
Mojgan Naeimirad
spellingShingle Sedigheh Esmaeilzadeh
Mahbobe Ramezani
Zeinab Pahlevan
Sina Taheri
Faezeh Zabihi
Mojgan Naeimirad
Nifedipin versus magnesium sulfate for suppression of preterm labor: A randomized Clinical trial
Caspian Journal of Reproductive Medicine
preterm labor
nifedipine
magnesium sulfate.
author_facet Sedigheh Esmaeilzadeh
Mahbobe Ramezani
Zeinab Pahlevan
Sina Taheri
Faezeh Zabihi
Mojgan Naeimirad
author_sort Sedigheh Esmaeilzadeh
title Nifedipin versus magnesium sulfate for suppression of preterm labor: A randomized Clinical trial
title_short Nifedipin versus magnesium sulfate for suppression of preterm labor: A randomized Clinical trial
title_full Nifedipin versus magnesium sulfate for suppression of preterm labor: A randomized Clinical trial
title_fullStr Nifedipin versus magnesium sulfate for suppression of preterm labor: A randomized Clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Nifedipin versus magnesium sulfate for suppression of preterm labor: A randomized Clinical trial
title_sort nifedipin versus magnesium sulfate for suppression of preterm labor: a randomized clinical trial
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
series Caspian Journal of Reproductive Medicine
issn 2423-5660
2423-5660
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Background: Preterm labor is a leading cause of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There are various kinds of drugs used to suppress the preterm labor, but they are not thoroughly effective. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of oral nifedipine with intravenous magnesium sulfate in delaying the preterm labor. Methods: A randomized, clinical trial was conducted in a hospital in Babol, Iran. One hundred twenty singleton pregnant women with preterm labor, 24-37 weeks of gestation, were randomly assigned to receive oral nifedipine or intravenous magnesium sulfate. The main outcome of the study was the inhibition of uterine and the secondary outcome was the side effect related to drugs and neonatal outcome. The data were analyzed with SPSS software, using chi-squared test and independent t test. Results: According to the results, in 35% of women in the nifedipine group and 23.3% of women in the magnesium sulfate group, the inhibited uterine contraction was less than 48 hours. Also, in 65.0% of women in the nifedipine group and 76.7% of women in the magnesium sulfate group, the inhibited uterine contraction was more than 48 hours. There was no significant difference between the nifedipine and the magnesium sulfate groups in the inhibition of uterine contraction in both less and more than 48 hours. The total side effects of medication were found to be lower in patients receiving oral nifedipine than those who received intravenous magnesium sulfate. (26.6 vs. 45.0) (p= 0.036). There was no significant difference in neonatal outcome between the two groups. Conclusion: Oral nifedipine should be a suitable alternative to intravenous magnesium sulfate in suppression preterm labor with fewer side effects.
topic preterm labor
nifedipine
magnesium sulfate.
url http://caspjrm.ir/article-1-110-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT sedighehesmaeilzadeh nifedipinversusmagnesiumsulfateforsuppressionofpretermlaborarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mahboberamezani nifedipinversusmagnesiumsulfateforsuppressionofpretermlaborarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zeinabpahlevan nifedipinversusmagnesiumsulfateforsuppressionofpretermlaborarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sinataheri nifedipinversusmagnesiumsulfateforsuppressionofpretermlaborarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT faezehzabihi nifedipinversusmagnesiumsulfateforsuppressionofpretermlaborarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mojgannaeimirad nifedipinversusmagnesiumsulfateforsuppressionofpretermlaborarandomizedclinicaltrial
_version_ 1724414337146159104