Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī and His Use of Ibn Sīnā's al-Ḥikma al-‘Arūḍiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar

The last four sections of the first book of Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī’s summa, entitled Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar, deal with dialectics, sophistical refutations, rhetoric, and poetics in full line with Aristotle’s Organon. However, they are not so much based on Aristotle’s works, but on a work of the young...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jules Janssen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Studies Association (ILEM) 2016-10-01
Series:Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/5-cilt3-sayi1/1-m0035/jules-janssens_en.pdf
id doaj-3538b1ab0b3d4ebe8447ebcae421aec8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3538b1ab0b3d4ebe8447ebcae421aec82020-11-25T00:59:38ZengScientific Studies Association (ILEM)Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences2547-94152547-94152016-10-013112210.12658/Nazariyat.3.1.M0035Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī and His Use of Ibn Sīnā's al-Ḥikma al-‘Arūḍiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitāb al-Mu‘tabarJules Janssen0Leuven UniversityThe last four sections of the first book of Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī’s summa, entitled Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar, deal with dialectics, sophistical refutations, rhetoric, and poetics in full line with Aristotle’s Organon. However, they are not so much based on Aristotle’s works, but on a work of the young Ibn Sīnā, namely al-Hikma al-‘Arūdiyya. Both texts have much in common not only in their structure, but also in their very wording. The article presents a basic survey of the correspondences for all four sections and also highlights the most significant differences. However, important part of these differences has a counterpart in an (incomplete) logical text, which is present in the manuscript Nuruosmaniye 4894 and which is, in turn, very close to, albeit not identical, with Ibn Sīnā’s al-Hikma al-‘Arūdiyya as conserved in the unique manuscript Uppsala 364. Therefore, it is obvious that Abū al-Barakāt takes over many formulations and, at once, many ideas from Ibn Sīnā. However, he adds clearly personal elements that often seem to have been religiously inspired and, on occasion, consciously returns to Aristotle’s wording.https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/5-cilt3-sayi1/1-m0035/jules-janssens_en.pdfAbū al-Barakāt al-BaghdādīIbn SīnālogicKitāb al-Mu‘tabaral-Hikma al-‘Arūdiyyams. Nuruosmaniye 4984
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jules Janssen
spellingShingle Jules Janssen
Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī and His Use of Ibn Sīnā's al-Ḥikma al-‘Arūḍiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar
Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī
Ibn Sīnā
logic
Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar
al-Hikma al-‘Arūdiyya
ms. Nuruosmaniye 4984
author_facet Jules Janssen
author_sort Jules Janssen
title Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī and His Use of Ibn Sīnā's al-Ḥikma al-‘Arūḍiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar
title_short Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī and His Use of Ibn Sīnā's al-Ḥikma al-‘Arūḍiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar
title_full Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī and His Use of Ibn Sīnā's al-Ḥikma al-‘Arūḍiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar
title_fullStr Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī and His Use of Ibn Sīnā's al-Ḥikma al-‘Arūḍiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar
title_full_unstemmed Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī and His Use of Ibn Sīnā's al-Ḥikma al-‘Arūḍiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar
title_sort abū al-barakāt al-baghdādī and his use of ibn sīnā's al-ḥikma al-‘arūḍiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the logical part of his kitāb al-mu‘tabar
publisher Scientific Studies Association (ILEM)
series Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
issn 2547-9415
2547-9415
publishDate 2016-10-01
description The last four sections of the first book of Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī’s summa, entitled Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar, deal with dialectics, sophistical refutations, rhetoric, and poetics in full line with Aristotle’s Organon. However, they are not so much based on Aristotle’s works, but on a work of the young Ibn Sīnā, namely al-Hikma al-‘Arūdiyya. Both texts have much in common not only in their structure, but also in their very wording. The article presents a basic survey of the correspondences for all four sections and also highlights the most significant differences. However, important part of these differences has a counterpart in an (incomplete) logical text, which is present in the manuscript Nuruosmaniye 4894 and which is, in turn, very close to, albeit not identical, with Ibn Sīnā’s al-Hikma al-‘Arūdiyya as conserved in the unique manuscript Uppsala 364. Therefore, it is obvious that Abū al-Barakāt takes over many formulations and, at once, many ideas from Ibn Sīnā. However, he adds clearly personal elements that often seem to have been religiously inspired and, on occasion, consciously returns to Aristotle’s wording.
topic Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī
Ibn Sīnā
logic
Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar
al-Hikma al-‘Arūdiyya
ms. Nuruosmaniye 4984
url https://nazariyat.org/content/5-sayilar/5-cilt3-sayi1/1-m0035/jules-janssens_en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT julesjanssen abualbarakatalbaghdadiandhisuseofibnsinasalhikmaalarudiyyaoranotherworkcloselyrelatedtoitinthelogicalpartofhiskitabalmutabar
_version_ 1725217080330944512