The politics, science, and art of receptivity

With so much attention on the issue of voice in democratic theory, the inverse question of how people come to listen remains a marginal one. Recent scholarship in affect and neuroscience reveals that cognitive and verbal strategies, while privileged in democratic politics, are often insufficient to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emily Beausoleil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2014-03-01
Series:Ethics & Global Politics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/download/23231/32926
id doaj-3546cba1a48e4e0b918a3ef6f623726a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3546cba1a48e4e0b918a3ef6f623726a2020-11-25T01:22:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEthics & Global Politics1654-49511654-63692014-03-017010010.3402/egp.v7.2323123231The politics, science, and art of receptivityEmily BeausoleilWith so much attention on the issue of voice in democratic theory, the inverse question of how people come to listen remains a marginal one. Recent scholarship in affect and neuroscience reveals that cognitive and verbal strategies, while privileged in democratic politics, are often insufficient to cultivate the receptivity that constitutes the most basic premise of democratic encounters. This article draws on this scholarship and a recent case of forum theatre to examine the conditions of receptivity and responsiveness, and identify specific strategies that foster such conditions. It argues that the forms of encounter most effective in cultivating receptivity are those that move us via affective intensity within pointedly mediated contexts. It is this constellation of strategies—this strange marriage of immersion and mediation—that enabled this performance to surface latent memory, affect and bias, unsettle entrenched patterns of thought and behaviour, and provide the conditions for revisability. This case makes clear that to lie beyond the domain of cognitive and verbal processes is not to lie beyond potential intervention, and offers insight to how such receptivity might be achieved in political processes more broadly.http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/download/23231/32926receptivitydemocracyneuroscienceaffectperformance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emily Beausoleil
spellingShingle Emily Beausoleil
The politics, science, and art of receptivity
Ethics & Global Politics
receptivity
democracy
neuroscience
affect
performance
author_facet Emily Beausoleil
author_sort Emily Beausoleil
title The politics, science, and art of receptivity
title_short The politics, science, and art of receptivity
title_full The politics, science, and art of receptivity
title_fullStr The politics, science, and art of receptivity
title_full_unstemmed The politics, science, and art of receptivity
title_sort politics, science, and art of receptivity
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Ethics & Global Politics
issn 1654-4951
1654-6369
publishDate 2014-03-01
description With so much attention on the issue of voice in democratic theory, the inverse question of how people come to listen remains a marginal one. Recent scholarship in affect and neuroscience reveals that cognitive and verbal strategies, while privileged in democratic politics, are often insufficient to cultivate the receptivity that constitutes the most basic premise of democratic encounters. This article draws on this scholarship and a recent case of forum theatre to examine the conditions of receptivity and responsiveness, and identify specific strategies that foster such conditions. It argues that the forms of encounter most effective in cultivating receptivity are those that move us via affective intensity within pointedly mediated contexts. It is this constellation of strategies—this strange marriage of immersion and mediation—that enabled this performance to surface latent memory, affect and bias, unsettle entrenched patterns of thought and behaviour, and provide the conditions for revisability. This case makes clear that to lie beyond the domain of cognitive and verbal processes is not to lie beyond potential intervention, and offers insight to how such receptivity might be achieved in political processes more broadly.
topic receptivity
democracy
neuroscience
affect
performance
url http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/download/23231/32926
work_keys_str_mv AT emilybeausoleil thepoliticsscienceandartofreceptivity
AT emilybeausoleil politicsscienceandartofreceptivity
_version_ 1725125889973288960