The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects

Abstract The aim of this paper is to present a review of the legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects of secessions from an economic perspective. This survey provides interesting insights into recent events such as the Brexit and the threat of secession made for instance by Scotland and Catalonia....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thierry Madiès, Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi, Jean-Pierre Tranchant, Cyril Trépier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-04-01
Series:Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41937-017-0015-6
id doaj-358d23d169e14ff7a17cbf90e12ed1cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-358d23d169e14ff7a17cbf90e12ed1cd2020-11-24T21:39:52ZengSpringerOpenSwiss Journal of Economics and Statistics2235-62822018-04-01154111810.1186/s41937-017-0015-6The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspectsThierry Madiès0Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi1Jean-Pierre Tranchant2Cyril Trépier3Department of Economics, University of FribourgUniversity of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, CERDIInstitute of Development Studies, University of SussexCRAG, University of Paris 8 Saint-DenisAbstract The aim of this paper is to present a review of the legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects of secessions from an economic perspective. This survey provides interesting insights into recent events such as the Brexit and the threat of secession made for instance by Scotland and Catalonia. International law does not grant a general right to secede, nor does it forbid secession. Furthermore, there are several modalities of secessions, which turn out to be important for new states that want to get an international recognition. For its part, the economic theory shows that the decision for a region to remain in a country (or a union) or to secede eventually results from a trade-off between the benefits of being part of a large country, on the one hand, and the costs often associated to more heterogeneity, on the other hand. The latter are generally more important for those regions which are “far away” from the central (federal) government. Empirical literature confirms the importance of these trade-offs and shows that decentralization may be effective to accommodate secessionist conflicts only if certain conditions are fulfilled.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41937-017-0015-6
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thierry Madiès
Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi
Jean-Pierre Tranchant
Cyril Trépier
spellingShingle Thierry Madiès
Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi
Jean-Pierre Tranchant
Cyril Trépier
The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics
author_facet Thierry Madiès
Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi
Jean-Pierre Tranchant
Cyril Trépier
author_sort Thierry Madiès
title The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects
title_short The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects
title_full The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects
title_fullStr The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects
title_full_unstemmed The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects
title_sort economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects
publisher SpringerOpen
series Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics
issn 2235-6282
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract The aim of this paper is to present a review of the legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects of secessions from an economic perspective. This survey provides interesting insights into recent events such as the Brexit and the threat of secession made for instance by Scotland and Catalonia. International law does not grant a general right to secede, nor does it forbid secession. Furthermore, there are several modalities of secessions, which turn out to be important for new states that want to get an international recognition. For its part, the economic theory shows that the decision for a region to remain in a country (or a union) or to secede eventually results from a trade-off between the benefits of being part of a large country, on the one hand, and the costs often associated to more heterogeneity, on the other hand. The latter are generally more important for those regions which are “far away” from the central (federal) government. Empirical literature confirms the importance of these trade-offs and shows that decentralization may be effective to accommodate secessionist conflicts only if certain conditions are fulfilled.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41937-017-0015-6
work_keys_str_mv AT thierrymadies theeconomicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects
AT gregoirerotagrasiozi theeconomicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects
AT jeanpierretranchant theeconomicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects
AT cyriltrepier theeconomicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects
AT thierrymadies economicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects
AT gregoirerotagrasiozi economicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects
AT jeanpierretranchant economicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects
AT cyriltrepier economicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects
_version_ 1725928756533526528