The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects
Abstract The aim of this paper is to present a review of the legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects of secessions from an economic perspective. This survey provides interesting insights into recent events such as the Brexit and the threat of secession made for instance by Scotland and Catalonia....
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41937-017-0015-6 |
id |
doaj-358d23d169e14ff7a17cbf90e12ed1cd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-358d23d169e14ff7a17cbf90e12ed1cd2020-11-24T21:39:52ZengSpringerOpenSwiss Journal of Economics and Statistics2235-62822018-04-01154111810.1186/s41937-017-0015-6The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspectsThierry Madiès0Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi1Jean-Pierre Tranchant2Cyril Trépier3Department of Economics, University of FribourgUniversity of Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, CERDIInstitute of Development Studies, University of SussexCRAG, University of Paris 8 Saint-DenisAbstract The aim of this paper is to present a review of the legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects of secessions from an economic perspective. This survey provides interesting insights into recent events such as the Brexit and the threat of secession made for instance by Scotland and Catalonia. International law does not grant a general right to secede, nor does it forbid secession. Furthermore, there are several modalities of secessions, which turn out to be important for new states that want to get an international recognition. For its part, the economic theory shows that the decision for a region to remain in a country (or a union) or to secede eventually results from a trade-off between the benefits of being part of a large country, on the one hand, and the costs often associated to more heterogeneity, on the other hand. The latter are generally more important for those regions which are “far away” from the central (federal) government. Empirical literature confirms the importance of these trade-offs and shows that decentralization may be effective to accommodate secessionist conflicts only if certain conditions are fulfilled.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41937-017-0015-6 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Thierry Madiès Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi Jean-Pierre Tranchant Cyril Trépier |
spellingShingle |
Thierry Madiès Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi Jean-Pierre Tranchant Cyril Trépier The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics |
author_facet |
Thierry Madiès Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi Jean-Pierre Tranchant Cyril Trépier |
author_sort |
Thierry Madiès |
title |
The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects |
title_short |
The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects |
title_full |
The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects |
title_fullStr |
The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects |
title_full_unstemmed |
The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects |
title_sort |
economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics |
issn |
2235-6282 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
Abstract The aim of this paper is to present a review of the legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects of secessions from an economic perspective. This survey provides interesting insights into recent events such as the Brexit and the threat of secession made for instance by Scotland and Catalonia. International law does not grant a general right to secede, nor does it forbid secession. Furthermore, there are several modalities of secessions, which turn out to be important for new states that want to get an international recognition. For its part, the economic theory shows that the decision for a region to remain in a country (or a union) or to secede eventually results from a trade-off between the benefits of being part of a large country, on the one hand, and the costs often associated to more heterogeneity, on the other hand. The latter are generally more important for those regions which are “far away” from the central (federal) government. Empirical literature confirms the importance of these trade-offs and shows that decentralization may be effective to accommodate secessionist conflicts only if certain conditions are fulfilled. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41937-017-0015-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thierrymadies theeconomicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects AT gregoirerotagrasiozi theeconomicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects AT jeanpierretranchant theeconomicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects AT cyriltrepier theeconomicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects AT thierrymadies economicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects AT gregoirerotagrasiozi economicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects AT jeanpierretranchant economicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects AT cyriltrepier economicsofsecessionareviewoflegaltheoreticalandempiricalaspects |
_version_ |
1725928756533526528 |