Generalized logarithmic penalty function method for solving smooth nonlinear programming involving invex functions

In this paper, we have reviewed some penalty function methods for solving constrained optimization problems in the literature and proposed a continuously differentiable logarithmic penalty function which consists of the proposed logarithmic penalty function and modified Courant-Beltrami penalty func...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mansur Hassan, Adam Baharum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2019.1600317
id doaj-35b731f6a2a74ecf846e72a71722c2da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35b731f6a2a74ecf846e72a71722c2da2020-11-25T02:50:48ZengTaylor & Francis GroupArab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences2576-52992019-01-0126120221410.1080/25765299.2019.16003171600317Generalized logarithmic penalty function method for solving smooth nonlinear programming involving invex functionsMansur Hassan0Adam Baharum1Universiti Sains MalaysiaUniversiti Sains MalaysiaIn this paper, we have reviewed some penalty function methods for solving constrained optimization problems in the literature and proposed a continuously differentiable logarithmic penalty function which consists of the proposed logarithmic penalty function and modified Courant-Beltrami penalty function for equality and inequality constraints, respectively. Furthermore, we hybridized the two and came up with the general form of both (equality and inequality) constraints. However, in the first part, the equivalence between the sets of optimal solutions in the original optimization problem and its associated penalized logarithmic optimization problem constituted by invex functions with equality and inequality constraints has been established. In the second part, we have validated the general form of the logarithmic penalty function and compared the results with absolute value penalty function results by solving nine small problems from Hock-Schittkowski collections of test problems with different classifications. The experiments were carried out via quasi-newton algorithm using a fminunc routine function in matlab2018a. The general form yields a better objective value compared to absolute value penalty function.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2019.1600317penalty functionpenalized optimization problemlogarithmic penalty functioninvex functioncourant-beltrami penalty function
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mansur Hassan
Adam Baharum
spellingShingle Mansur Hassan
Adam Baharum
Generalized logarithmic penalty function method for solving smooth nonlinear programming involving invex functions
Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
penalty function
penalized optimization problem
logarithmic penalty function
invex function
courant-beltrami penalty function
author_facet Mansur Hassan
Adam Baharum
author_sort Mansur Hassan
title Generalized logarithmic penalty function method for solving smooth nonlinear programming involving invex functions
title_short Generalized logarithmic penalty function method for solving smooth nonlinear programming involving invex functions
title_full Generalized logarithmic penalty function method for solving smooth nonlinear programming involving invex functions
title_fullStr Generalized logarithmic penalty function method for solving smooth nonlinear programming involving invex functions
title_full_unstemmed Generalized logarithmic penalty function method for solving smooth nonlinear programming involving invex functions
title_sort generalized logarithmic penalty function method for solving smooth nonlinear programming involving invex functions
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
issn 2576-5299
publishDate 2019-01-01
description In this paper, we have reviewed some penalty function methods for solving constrained optimization problems in the literature and proposed a continuously differentiable logarithmic penalty function which consists of the proposed logarithmic penalty function and modified Courant-Beltrami penalty function for equality and inequality constraints, respectively. Furthermore, we hybridized the two and came up with the general form of both (equality and inequality) constraints. However, in the first part, the equivalence between the sets of optimal solutions in the original optimization problem and its associated penalized logarithmic optimization problem constituted by invex functions with equality and inequality constraints has been established. In the second part, we have validated the general form of the logarithmic penalty function and compared the results with absolute value penalty function results by solving nine small problems from Hock-Schittkowski collections of test problems with different classifications. The experiments were carried out via quasi-newton algorithm using a fminunc routine function in matlab2018a. The general form yields a better objective value compared to absolute value penalty function.
topic penalty function
penalized optimization problem
logarithmic penalty function
invex function
courant-beltrami penalty function
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2019.1600317
work_keys_str_mv AT mansurhassan generalizedlogarithmicpenaltyfunctionmethodforsolvingsmoothnonlinearprogramminginvolvinginvexfunctions
AT adambaharum generalizedlogarithmicpenaltyfunctionmethodforsolvingsmoothnonlinearprogramminginvolvinginvexfunctions
_version_ 1724736271917514752