Énonciation, corpus et representativité : le cas de « along »

The representativeness of a corpus is a function of the relationship between the corpus and a target language or language variety the corpus is intended to sample. However, the second term of this relationship can only be apprehended via a finite set of language occurrences, i.e. a corpus. For this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Graham Ranger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Française de Linguistique Cognitive 2019-07-01
Series:CogniTextes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/cognitextes/1517
id doaj-35d090647ba042c6b55e00e8c1488c80
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35d090647ba042c6b55e00e8c1488c802020-11-24T20:50:09ZengAssociation Française de Linguistique CognitiveCogniTextes1958-53222019-07-011910.4000/cognitextes.1517Énonciation, corpus et representativité : le cas de « along »Graham RangerThe representativeness of a corpus is a function of the relationship between the corpus and a target language or language variety the corpus is intended to sample. However, the second term of this relationship can only be apprehended via a finite set of language occurrences, i.e. a corpus. For this reason we prefer to consider representativeness with respect to one’s specific research goals. In the enunciative approach to language, markers are described in terms of an invariant schematic form, configured by the pressure of surrounding operations into contextually-situated shapes. The elaboration of a schematic form is carried out on the evidence of authentic examples studied in context and submitted to manipulations and judgements of acceptability on the basis of the linguist’s intuition, essentially. This paper argues that corpus methodologies can provide invaluable quantitative support for these intuitions and, from there, for the theoretical constructions of enunciative approaches to language. We argue the case for such an approach with a study of the marker “along,“ using data from the British National Corpus. Collocational affinities of “along“ will allow us progressively to identify four particularly significant contextual configurations, yielding spatial, temporal, subjective and argumentative values for the marker.http://journals.openedition.org/cognitextes/1517enunciationTheory of Enunciative and Predicative Operationscorpus linguisticsprepositionparticleBritish National Corpus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Graham Ranger
spellingShingle Graham Ranger
Énonciation, corpus et representativité : le cas de « along »
CogniTextes
enunciation
Theory of Enunciative and Predicative Operations
corpus linguistics
preposition
particle
British National Corpus
author_facet Graham Ranger
author_sort Graham Ranger
title Énonciation, corpus et representativité : le cas de « along »
title_short Énonciation, corpus et representativité : le cas de « along »
title_full Énonciation, corpus et representativité : le cas de « along »
title_fullStr Énonciation, corpus et representativité : le cas de « along »
title_full_unstemmed Énonciation, corpus et representativité : le cas de « along »
title_sort énonciation, corpus et representativité : le cas de « along »
publisher Association Française de Linguistique Cognitive
series CogniTextes
issn 1958-5322
publishDate 2019-07-01
description The representativeness of a corpus is a function of the relationship between the corpus and a target language or language variety the corpus is intended to sample. However, the second term of this relationship can only be apprehended via a finite set of language occurrences, i.e. a corpus. For this reason we prefer to consider representativeness with respect to one’s specific research goals. In the enunciative approach to language, markers are described in terms of an invariant schematic form, configured by the pressure of surrounding operations into contextually-situated shapes. The elaboration of a schematic form is carried out on the evidence of authentic examples studied in context and submitted to manipulations and judgements of acceptability on the basis of the linguist’s intuition, essentially. This paper argues that corpus methodologies can provide invaluable quantitative support for these intuitions and, from there, for the theoretical constructions of enunciative approaches to language. We argue the case for such an approach with a study of the marker “along,“ using data from the British National Corpus. Collocational affinities of “along“ will allow us progressively to identify four particularly significant contextual configurations, yielding spatial, temporal, subjective and argumentative values for the marker.
topic enunciation
Theory of Enunciative and Predicative Operations
corpus linguistics
preposition
particle
British National Corpus
url http://journals.openedition.org/cognitextes/1517
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamranger enonciationcorpusetrepresentativitelecasdealong
_version_ 1716804502556770304