Towards a Common European Asylum System: Asylum, Human Rights, and European Values

The turn of the millennium has been met with a considerable amount of work in the area of refugee protection, culminating in the UNHCR’s Agenda for Protection and Convention Plus initiatives. In addition, in 1999 the European Union embarked on a five-year program to develop a Common European Asylum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harold Shepherd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: York University Libraries 2004-05-01
Series:Refuge
Online Access:https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21321
id doaj-35dee86787e3437a9d5fcfe840e51da5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35dee86787e3437a9d5fcfe840e51da52020-11-25T03:37:03ZengYork University LibrariesRefuge 0229-51131920-73362004-05-0122110.25071/1920-7336.21321Towards a Common European Asylum System: Asylum, Human Rights, and European ValuesHarold ShepherdThe turn of the millennium has been met with a considerable amount of work in the area of refugee protection, culminating in the UNHCR’s Agenda for Protection and Convention Plus initiatives. In addition, in 1999 the European Union embarked on a five-year program to develop a Common European Asylum System as mandated by the Treaty of Amsterdam. Work done by the European Commission sought to incorporate asylum into broader issues of immigration, border security, and foreign relations. As a result, entitlements were generally limited to those that have been mandated by applicable international, European, or domestic law. Some exceptions were further reduced at the political level. Functional values of bureaucratic efficiency and pragmatic political considerations converged to create the lowest common denominator. On the other hand, voices in civil society were raised to protest this approach, advocating that normative values that underpin international human rights law should serve as the interpretative context. In light of this debate, this may be an appropriate time for the international community to revisit the question of status for those not described in the Geneva Convention.https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21321
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harold Shepherd
spellingShingle Harold Shepherd
Towards a Common European Asylum System: Asylum, Human Rights, and European Values
Refuge
author_facet Harold Shepherd
author_sort Harold Shepherd
title Towards a Common European Asylum System: Asylum, Human Rights, and European Values
title_short Towards a Common European Asylum System: Asylum, Human Rights, and European Values
title_full Towards a Common European Asylum System: Asylum, Human Rights, and European Values
title_fullStr Towards a Common European Asylum System: Asylum, Human Rights, and European Values
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Common European Asylum System: Asylum, Human Rights, and European Values
title_sort towards a common european asylum system: asylum, human rights, and european values
publisher York University Libraries
series Refuge
issn 0229-5113
1920-7336
publishDate 2004-05-01
description The turn of the millennium has been met with a considerable amount of work in the area of refugee protection, culminating in the UNHCR’s Agenda for Protection and Convention Plus initiatives. In addition, in 1999 the European Union embarked on a five-year program to develop a Common European Asylum System as mandated by the Treaty of Amsterdam. Work done by the European Commission sought to incorporate asylum into broader issues of immigration, border security, and foreign relations. As a result, entitlements were generally limited to those that have been mandated by applicable international, European, or domestic law. Some exceptions were further reduced at the political level. Functional values of bureaucratic efficiency and pragmatic political considerations converged to create the lowest common denominator. On the other hand, voices in civil society were raised to protest this approach, advocating that normative values that underpin international human rights law should serve as the interpretative context. In light of this debate, this may be an appropriate time for the international community to revisit the question of status for those not described in the Geneva Convention.
url https://refuge.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/refuge/article/view/21321
work_keys_str_mv AT haroldshepherd towardsacommoneuropeanasylumsystemasylumhumanrightsandeuropeanvalues
_version_ 1724547411018252288